Caitlin Clark will miss her second straight game and her seventh this season after the Indiana Fever star remains sidelined from Friday nights matchup against the Dallas Wings with a groin injury.The Fever announced the injury update hours before Indiana was due to face the Wings and 2025 WNBA first overall pick Paige Bueckers for the first time this season.This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett had pointed words for her colleague Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, accusing Jackson of taking an "extreme" position on the role of the judiciary branch.Writing in her Supreme Court opinion on nationwide injunctions on Friday, Barrett said Jacksons dissent contained "rhetoric," and she signaled that the liberal justices arguments were not worth much attention."We will not dwell on Justice Jacksons argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself," Barrett wrote. "We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."The Supreme Courts decision came as part of an emergency request from the Trump administration asking the high court to put an end to judges issuing universal injunctions, including those that judges have placed on President Donald Trumps birthright citizenship order.TRUMP CELEBRATES SUPREME COURT LIMITS ON 'COLOSSAL ABUSE OF POWER' BY FEDERAL JUDGESBarrett, who was appointed by Trump, wrote that when judges issue injunctions to block policies, like those the Trump administration is trying to implement, they cannot apply the injunction to more than the parties involved in the case. Barrett said that type of order, often called a "nationwide injunction," is judicial overreach.But Barretts opinion left open numerous other ways that plaintiffs can seek broad forms of relief from the courts, including by bringing class action lawsuits or statewide lawsuits.SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS REINS IN SOTOMAYOR AFTER REPEATED INTERRUPTIONSJackson wrote that nationwide injunctions should be permissible because the courts should not allow the president to "violate the Constitution." Barrett said that was not based on any existing legal doctrine."She offers a vision of the judicial role that would make even the most ardent defender of judicial supremacy blush," Barrett wrote.Sotomayor, meanwhile, wrote in her own dissenting opinion that the Supreme Court was being "complicit" by allowing the Trump administration to extract a perceived win out of the high court over birthright citizenship.SUPREME COURT TAKES ON BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP: LIBERALS BALK AT TRUMP ARGUMENT TO END NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIONSSotomayor said that every court that has reviewed Trump's birthright citizenship plan thus far has blocked Trump from carrying it out. Trump played a "different game," Sotomayor said, by bringing the case before the Supreme Court without actually asking the justices to analyze the merits of his plan. Trump instead asked the justices to weigh in on the legality of nationwide injunctions in general.Trumps birthright citizenship order would eliminate the 150-year-old right under the 14th Amendment that allows babies born in the United States to receive automatic citizenship regardless of their parents citizenship status.The Supreme Court's decision still allows for the high possibility that judges will continue to widely block Trump's birthright citizenship order, but with different legal maneuvering on the part of the plaintiffs and the courts.

Former Vice President Kamala Harris prospective gubernatorial bid is not striking up much excitement among Democratic fundraisers in California, Politico reported Friday.The outlet spoke to multiple Democratic Party donors in California to see how they felt about Harris possibly running for governor. So far, her interest in exploring a gubernatorial run in the state following her 2024 presidential election loss hasnt enthused many."She still would probably lead, but honestly, no one is incredibly pumped," one Southern California fundraiser told Politico.REPUBLICANS USE MAMDANI BOMBSHELL VICTORY OVER CUOMO AS AMMUNITION TO BLAST DEMOCRATS AS EXTREMISTSHarris, who lost November's election to President Donald Trump, is seriously considering a 2026 bid to succeed term-limited Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif. A source close to Harris told Fox News Digital in March that she has told allies she will decide by the end of summer on whether to launch a gubernatorial campaign.The two potential options for Harris are launching a gubernatorial run next year in her home state or seeking the presidency again in 2028. Extremely early polls in the next Democratic Party presidential nomination race which are heavily reliant on name recognition at this point indicate that the former vice president holds a significant lead over other potential White House contenders."In interviews, several major donors in the state told POLITICO they fear her reemergence as a candidate would re-open still-fresh wounds from her defeat in 2024," the outlet reported. "Some harbor lingering frustration about how her billion-dollar campaign juggernaut ended in debt and want assurances she would have a clear plan to win the governors mansion."TOP TRUMP ALLY TEASES BID FOR CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR IF HARRIS RUNSMather Martin, a party fundraiser from San Francisco who worked for multiple Harris campaigns, told Politico, "There was more enthusiasm at first" for Harris run. However, he added, "I think it waned a bit."Another donor who gave a six-figure donation to Harris presidential campaign last year told the outlet they had found the implosion of her White House bid "traumatizing" and seemed reluctant to support her in the state."Kamala just reminds you we are in this complete s--- storm. With Biden, we got bamboozled I think she did the best she could in that situation, but obviously she knew about the cognitive decline too. Ive written so many checks because I knew the Trump administration would be horrible, but were living in a nightmare because of the Democrats. Im furious at them, truly."The donor who declared that "no one is incredibly pumped" about Harris run also shared that donors "realize its just going to bring up the whole pathetic last presidential, which no one wants to hear about again. And then its the whole Did you know Joe Biden? thing."CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTUREScott Drexel, a donor-adviser based in the San Francisco Bay Area, noted, "Its very fair to say theres not an overwhelming clamor" for Harris gubernatorial run.He also pointed out, "Its very hard for there to be one if its not 100 percent clear if she really wants to do it.""Shes going to have to work for the nomination. Every day that passes, theres less of a sense of inevitability about her candidacy," Drexel said.Democratic donor and San Francisco trial lawyer Joe Cotchett told Politico, "She is talking to people around the state about whether she is going to run. If she does, shes going to have very difficult problems."CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPHarris team did not immediately reply to Fox News Digitals request for comment.Fox News Digitals Paul Steinhauser contributed to this report.

EXCLUSIVE: When Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's plane ride home encountered issues back from Guatemala on Thursday, she hitched a ride from Immigration and Customs Enforcement.ICE had just conducted a deportation flight from the United States to the Central American country, as the administration ramps up its efforts to remove those in the country illegally."Had some plane issues on the ride back from Guatemala. Fortunately, an ICE deportation flight carrying criminal illegal aliens had just touched down on the same tarmac in Guatemala," Noem said in a statement.NOEM DISMISSES JEFFRIES' WARNINGS AS DHS CONSIDERS ARRESTS OF DEMOCRATIC LAWMAKERS AFTER ICE FACILITY CLASHThe secretary used the opportunity to encourage individuals to self-deport before facing potential detention or further legal repercussions.For illegal immigrants who do not have criminal backgrounds, they are being offered free travel outside of the United States and $1,000. In addition, those who opt to self-deport will have their "failure to depart" fines, if applicable, scrapped."Hitched a ride back to the USA on ICE Airgreat flight. Use the [CBP Home] app to self deport now!" Noem continued.TOP TRUMP OFFICIAL TORCHES DEM SENATOR'S 'ADVOCACY FOR A KNOWN TERRORIST' DURING FIERY HEARING: 'ALARMING'According to DHS, the arriving flight included people with drug trafficking, arson, assault and battery convictions. The flight left Alexandria, Louisiana, and arrived in Guatemala at 1:30 p.m., just two hours before they were about to take off.CLICK HERE FOR MORE IMMIGRATION COVERAGEThe secretary just wrapped up a multi-country visit to Central America, including Panama, Honduras and Costa Rica. Noem announced that Honduras and Guatemala could now potentially take in asylum seekers as part of a deal."Honduras and now Guatemala, after today, will be countries that will take those individuals and give them refugee status as well," Noem said, according to the Associated Press.COLOMBIA AGREES TO SHARE MIGRANT DATA WITH US AFTER 'CANDID' TALKS WITH KRISTI NOEM"Weve never believed that the United States should be the only option, that the guarantee for a refugee is that they go somewhere to be safe and to be protected from whatever threat they face in their country. It doesnt necessarily have to be the United States," she added.The U.S. and Honduras also agreed to a "statement of intent" for "biometric cooperation.""We strengthened our partnership to combat illegal migration by signing a statement of intent for biometric cooperationa critical tool to help both Honduras and the United States detect criminals and terrorists attempting to cross our borders," Noem posted to X on Thursday.

A vaccine ingredient is in the spotlight this week, as a preservative called thimerosal was included on the agenda for a meeting of the CDCs Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)."Presentation regarding thimerosal in vaccines" was listed as an agenda item for Thursday, June 26, followed by "Proposed recommendations regarding thimerosal-containing influenza vaccine."Thimerosal (also spelled thiomersal) is a mercurybased preservative that has been used in multi-dose vaccines and medications since the 1930s as a means of preventing contamination, according to the CDC.CDC REMOVES COVID VACCINE RECOMMENDATION FOR HEALTHY CHILDREN AND PREGNANT WOMENThe ingredient is intended to prevent contamination by stopping the growth of bacteria and fungi, the same source states.Due to growing concerns about potential mercury exposure, the American Academy of Pediatrics, Public Health Service agencies and vaccine manufacturers agreed that thimerosal should be "reduced or eliminated in vaccines."In 2001, thimerosal was removed from all vaccines recommended for children 6 and younger except for influenza.Today, multi-dose flu vaccines still contain thimerosal, but other versions are available without the ingredient.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTERAt the June 27 meeting, the CDCsAdvisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted to recommend that all adults (including pregnant women) and allchildren 18 years and younger should receive seasonal influenza vaccines only in single-dose formulations that do not contain thimerosal, according to meeting notes published by the CDC.Despite these recommendations, the CDC and other health agencies have claimed there is no evidence that thimerosal poses health risks."Thimerosal use in medical products has a record of being very safe," the agencys website states. "Data from many studies show no evidence of harm caused by the low doses of thimerosal in vaccines."Dr. Jacob Glanville, CEO of Centivax, a San Francisco biotechnology company, reiterated that American children have not been receiving thimerosal for over 20 years in their vaccines, but that it remains in some multi-use vial vaccines, mostly outside the U.S."We support any effort to remove it entirely there are other preservatives that are not based on mercury," Glanville told Fox News Digital.For more Health articles, visitwww.foxnews.com/healthGlanville noted that his companys vaccines never contain mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, or pig- or cow-derived materials.

President Donald Trump said hes open to conducting additional strikes against Iran, should Tehran pick up its nuclear program again to a level that is concerning to the U.S."Sure. Without question, absolutely," Trump told reporters Friday when asked about the possibility of subsequent strikes.Trump has previously issued similar warnings to Iran, and said Wednesday at the NATO Summit in the Netherlands that if Tehran were to seek to repair its nuclear program once more the U.S. wouldn't hesitate to move forward with additional strikes.TRUMP SLAMS RUSSIA'S CASUAL THREAT TO ARM IRAN WITH NUCLEAR WEAPONS: THATS WHY PUTIN'S THE BOSS'Trump also slammed Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who declared victory over Israel on Thursday. Trump countered Khamenei's claims and said that he had spared Khamenei from death."I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life," Trump said in a post on Truth Social on Friday. "I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!"EX-CLINTON OFFICIAL APPLAUDS TRUMPS 'COURAGEOUS' IRAN CALL, DOUBTS HARRIS WOULD'VE HAD THE NERVE"I wish the leadership of Iran would realize that you often get more with HONEY than you do with VINEGAR. PEACE!!!" Trump said.The U.S. launched strikes late Saturday targeting key Iranian nuclear facilities, which involved more than 125 U.S. aircraft, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine told reporters Sunday.Following the strikes, Trump said in an address to the nation that the mission left the nuclear sites "completely and totally obliterated." But days later, a leaked report from the Defense Intelligence Agency, published by CNN and the New York Times, cast doubt on those claims, saying that the strikes had only set back Irans nuclear program by several months.RUSSIAN LEADER CLAIMS MULTIPLE COUNTRIES PREPPED TO PROVIDE IRAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS FOLLOWING US STRIKESMeanwhile, the U.S., Israel and Iran's Foreign Ministry have all said that the three nuclear sites that U.S. forces struck have encountered massive damage.According to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, the FBI is conducting an investigation to get to the bottom of the matter and who shared the document with the media.

FIRST ON FOX: Top House Republicans are warning the Senate to proceed carefully with any possible changes to President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill.""We in the House don't want to see this changed too much. Of course, they're going to put their mark on it, and they're going to shape it and hopefully make it better, But, yeah, it just can't change materially too much for us to have to thread that needle again," said Republican Study Committee (RSC) Chairman August Pfluger, R-Texas.He hosted House Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, on an episode of the RSC's podcast, "Right To The Point," an early copy of which was obtained by Fox News Digital.Arrington told Pfluger, "The reality is, we struck a very difficult and very, very delicate balance in the House that could be disrupted on any number of policy fronts, if the Senate were to go too far."148 DEMOCRATS BACK NONCITIZEN VOTING IN DC AS GOP RAISES ALARM ABOUT FOREIGN AGENTSThe RSC is a 189-strong member group in the House GOP that acts as the conference's de facto conservative think tank.Arrington's committee, meanwhile, plays a central role in the budget reconciliation process which is what Republicans are using to pass Trump's agenda on tax, immigration, energy, defense, and the national debt in one massive bill.It's notable that they used the RSC's weekly podcast to send a pointed message to their colleagues in the Senate, which comes as lawmakers there wrestle with key issues in the House's version of the bill.Senate Republicans still have to deal with unresolved questions on Medicaid and state and local tax (SALT) deductions, among other items.REPUBLICANS CHALLENGE 'IRRELEVANT' BUDGET OFFICE AS IT CRITIQUES TRUMP'S 'BEAUTIFUL BILL'Senate GOP leaders have said their changes to the bill are critical in order for it to survive their razor-thin majority of three seats the same margin as the House holds.The House passed its version of the bill by just one vote in late May. Now, different House GOP factions are warning that they will not accept the Senate's proposed changes on a number of key issues."If you and I had the pen, and it was just between two West Texans, I know there are deeper, deeper fiscal reforms that would bend the curve even more dramatically on our spending and debt to GDP. But we have other members that we have to negotiate with," Arrington said."So yes, make it as good as you can make in terms of improvements, but there is a point at which you will, instead of bend, you will break the delicate balance, and you will imperil the most important and most consequential bill with the greatest set of conservative reforms in my lifetime, if not 100 years."When reached for comment on Arrington's remark, Senate Majority Leader John Thune's office pointed Fox News Digital to the South Dakota Republican's appearance on the Hugh Hewitt show Wednesday."I met with [House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.] yesterday, and weve talked several times today already, just checking in on various aspects of the Senate bill and, you know, what the prospects are when it gets to the House," Thune said. "So theres been a lot of coordination from the very beginning about this and that, you know, continues to this day, which is why we continue to stay in close contact."Johnson, Thune and the White House have been in near-constant communication, hammering out details big and small in the bill.Pfluger said he was still "hopeful," however, about Republicans' self-imposed July 4 deadline."The Senate is wrestling with this bill right nowto make the changes that make it better, but to send it back to us in a fiscally disciplined way, where we know we still garner the savings where we do the right things to put money back into American families pockets," Pfluger said.Johnson told reporters on Friday that it was "possible" that the deadline could slip, but said he "doesn't want to accept that as an option right now."Fox News Digital's Alex Miller contributed to this report

Welcome to the Fox News Politics newsletter, with the latest updates on the Trump administration, Capitol Hill and more Fox News politics content. Here's what's happening-Top moments from the Trump-Biden debate that changed the course of the 2024 election-Trump celebrates Supreme Court limits on 'colossal abuse of power' by federal judges-Second Amendment 'setback': Gun tax cuts stripped from Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'The Supreme Court on Friday delivered a major victory in President Donald Trump's quest to block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions that had upended many of his administration's executive orders and actions.Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts to issue injunctions only in limited instances, though the ruling leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case.The Supreme Court agreed this year to take up a trio of consolidated cases involving so-called universal injunctions handed down by federal district judges in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state. Judges in those districts had blocked Trump's ban on birthright citizenship from taking force nationwide which the Trump administration argued in their appeal to the Supreme Court was overly broadREAD MOREAYATOLLAH'S DENIAL: Iranian foreign minister reiterates 'serious damage' to nuclear facilities, despite ayatollah's comments'LOWER THE TEMP': Nearly 200 House Dems reject resolution condemning violent anti-ICE riots in LABIKER NATION BECKONS: GOP senator invites Trump to 'an appreciation event like you've never seen' in deep-red stateAMERICA-FIRST FIGHT: Targeted by Trump, Rep. Thomas Massie hauls in campaign cashSHOW US THE PLAN: Republicans raise alarm over US vulnerability to mass drone strikes after Israel-Iran conflictTRUTH BURIED: Dem governor's decades-old political persecution claim over alleged cocaine use disputed by bombshell memoFAITH FAVORED: Supreme Court decides whether to allow parents to shield children from LGBTQ books in schoolPROTECTING THE FAITHFUL: $94 million in grants awarded to Jewish faith-based organizations to prevent violence and terrorism: DHSFACULTY FACT-FINDING: Justice Department investigating University of California over alleged DEI-based hiringJUDICIAL OVERREACH: California judge who blocked Trump National Guard order hit with impeachment resolutionIN THE CROSSHAIRS: Trump's DOJ pressuring University of Virginia to axe its president over DEI programs: reportGet the latest updates on the Trump administration and Congress, exclusive interviews and more on FoxNews.com.

Amid a legal battle between President Donald Trump and several Democratic-run states over birthright citizenship, Rep. Andy Barr, R-Ky., is introducing a constitutional amendment to "immediately put an end to this debate" by clarifying that children of illegal immigrants are not eligible for citizenship.Barr called the amendment an important step in helping the president "protect America."If passed, Barr's amendment would clarify the meaning of the 14th Amendments clause that persons must be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States to be citizens.The 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 to guarantee citizenship rights to former slaves, states that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."TRUMP ADMIN ENDS TEMPORARY PROTECTED STATUS FOR HAITIAN MIGRANTS CURRENTLY IN THE USBarrs amendment would clarify that "a person born in the United States may only be considered subject to the jurisdiction of the United States if the person is born in the United States of parents, one of whom is (1) a national of the United States; (2) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States whose residence is in the United States; or (3) an alien with lawful status under the immigration laws performing active service in the armed forces."This comes as the Supreme Court on Friday delivered a major victory in President Donald Trump's quest to block lower courts from issuing universal injunctions that had upended many of his administration's executive orders and actions, including his order ending birthright citizenship.Justices ruled 6-3 to allow the lower courts to issue injunctions only in limited instances. However, the ruling leaves open the question of how the ruling will apply to the birthright citizenship order at the heart of the case.37 HOUSE DEMS VOTE WITH GOP TO DEPORT ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT DRUNK DRIVERSThe Supreme Court agreed this year to take up a trio of consolidated cases involving so-called universal injunctions handed down by federal district judges in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state. Judges in those districts had blocked Trump's ban on birthright citizenship from taking force nationwide, which the Trump administration argued in its appeal to the Supreme Court was overly broad.The Supreme Court's arguments in May focused little on the merits of those universal injunctions. On Friday, the court made clear that it is not ruling on whether the birthright citizenship orders are constitutional.In a statement emailed to Fox News, Barr said, "I applaud SCOTUS for limiting injunctions, but we cannot wait on ending birthright citizenship."RUBIO ANNOUNCES NEW VISA RESTRICTIONS ON FAMILIES OF FENTANYL TRAFFICKERS"Radical District Judges have been stopping the MAGA agenda with nationwide injunctions, preventing President Trump from cleaning up the damage done under 4 years of Joe Biden," Barr said. "Ill be introducing a Constitutional Amendment in Congress immediately to put an end to this debate and END birthright citizenship once and for all."We must do whatever it takes to help President Trump protect America."

House Republicans are growing increasingly wary of the self-imposed July 4 deadline to get President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" to the White House, as the president warns that the bill "must" be ready for his signature by then."I think it's more important to get the bill correct than it is to get it fast," Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., a former House Freedom Caucus chairman, told Fox News Digital. "I'm interested in a great deliverable product, and spending the time and the resources necessary to get that, whatever they may be."It's a thought shared by members outside of the conservative rebel group as well Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., who represents part of New York City, said Fourth of July is a "realistic" goal, but not one she was married to."I'm not set on getting this done by July 4th. I know that's a goal, it's a nice soundbite, doing this on Independence Day and celebrating America," Malliotakis said. "But at the end of the day, we've got to do it right. And I'd rather take a few more days, a few more weeks, to make sure we can deliver a good product for the American people."148 DEMOCRATS BACK NONCITIZEN VOTING IN DC AS GOP RAISES ALARM ABOUT FOREIGN AGENTSSpeaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told reporters on Friday that it was "possible" the deadline could slip, "but I don't want to even accept that as an option right now. We want to try to push this."The vast tax and immigration bill is currently in the Senate, where lawmakers are still working through several key issues on Medicaid and state and local tax (SALT) deductions among other details.An earlier version passed the House by just one vote in late May.Now, several House Republicans are balking at proposed changes in the Senate though there's still no final product and warning that the bill could lose their support when it returns to the House.Rep. Greg Murphy, R-N.C., who leads the Doctors Caucus, told Fox News Digital he had issues with the Senate version's comparably harsher cuts to federal Medicaid funding.REPUBLICANS CHALLENGE 'IRRELEVANT' BUDGET OFFICE AS IT CRITIQUES TRUMP'S 'BEAUTIFUL BILL'"There is uniform agreement amongst many, many members in the House - if there's a change in the [federal Medicaid assistance percentage], we're not voting for it. It would remove the Medicaid expansion of North Carolina. I won't stand for that," he said.Asked about the feasibility of a July 4 deadline, Murphy said, "I've been a surgeon all my life if I plan things, I'm used to having them given up in case a patient needs me for emergencies and things like that."Rep. Nick LaLota, R-N.Y., a moderate, said "there might be some prudence" in letting go of the July 4 deadline.Conservative Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas, was more optimistic. "I think it's more worth it to get the bill right, but that's not to say we won't get it done by then," he said.Rep. Lloyd Smucker, R-Pa., suggested the timeline will rely heavily on Trump.The Senate is expected to work through the weekend to pass the bill.Johnson told House Republicans, meanwhile, to be flexible next week when they're expected to be home in their districts. Sources have told Fox News Digital that House GOP leaders have offered varying estimations of when lawmakers will have to be back in Washington, from Tuesday through Thursday.And the House is up against at least one real-world deadline: The U.S. is expected to run out of cash to pay its debts by the summer, according to multiple projections. Republicans have made raising the debt limit a priority in the bill.Trump, for his part, wrote on Truth Social Friday, "The House of Representatives must be ready to send it to my desk before July 4th We can get it done."He said during a press conference earlier in the day, "We can go longer, but we'd like to get it done by that time, if possible."