The NFL owners voted 22-10 to ban the Tush Push, but it needed 24 votes to go through. Colin Cowherd says that the NFL owners got it wrong due to the danger the play presents and how ugly it is for the NFL.

Fox News senior congressional correspondent Chad Pergram has the latest on congressional efforts to pass President Donald Trumps big, beautiful bill on The Faulkner Focus.

Brain surgeon Dr. Aizik Wolf tells jurors what exactly he believes killed Boston police officer John O'Keefe.

New Orleans Sheriff Susan Hutson took accountability for a jailbreak that led to 10 inmates escaping the Orleans Justice Center.

President Donald Trump takes questions following a bilateral meeting with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa at the White House.

Scott Smith, whose child was sexually assaulted at school, slammed the Loudoun County School Board amid news three boys are being investigated under Title IX. (Loudoun County schools)

Parents vented their fury at a Virginia school board meeting after a trans girl used a boys locker room sparking a Title IX investigation

Secretary of State Marco Rubio clashed with Rep. Brad Sherman during a House hearing on Wednesday, telling the California Democrat that "this is not a game show" when Sherman demanded that he only answer questions with a "yes" or a "no."Rubio testified before the House Foreign Affairs Committee in Washington, D.C., fielding questions on foreign aid, nuclear proliferation in Saudi Arabia and Iran, the war in Ukraine and more. Sparks began to fly early on when Sherman questioned Rubio on a potential nuclear cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia."First, I will tell you that there has been no conversation about entering into one. For example, during the recent trip," Rubio began before Sherman cut him off."Ive got limited time," the congressman interjected. "Either give me a yes or a no."RUBIO FIRES BACK AFTER DEM SENATOR SAYS HE REGRETS VOTING FOR HIM, SPARKING TENSE EXCHANGE"Well, Im going to give you my answer if you want my answer," Rubio replied.But Sherman cut Rubio off, stating that he was reclaiming his time."Well, reclaim your time. But it's not a game show," Rubio said. "I get to answer. These are complex questions.""Mr. Secretary, I'm reclaiming my time," Sherman said. "The filibustering takes place in the Senate. Not here.""I'm not filibustering.I'm trying to answer your question," Rubio replied.Sherman then moved on to his next question, asking whether Rubio could assure Congress that the Trump administration would continue sanctions on Iran until they verifiably agree to abandon all nuclear enrichment."That's a yes or no question," Sherman told Rubio.Rubio replied: "No, it's not."RUBIO, KAINE CLASH ON SOUTH AFRICAN REFUGEES: YOU DONT LIKE THAT THEY'RE WHITE'"Well, can you give me a yes or no? Should I go on to go on to the next?" Sherman asked."We believe that Iran should not be allowed to enrich uranium, correct," Rubio answered."You believe that?" Sherman asked."We believe that an acceptable deal with Iran is one in which they cannot enrich, because if they can enrich, they can weaponize," Rubio said."I know why we dont want I asked you will we agree, will we continue the sanctions until they verifiably agree to get rid of enrichments.""Oh, you have nothing to worry about," Rubio said. "The worry was the previous administration. This administration""Your refusal to give me an answer is loud and clear," Sherman interjected before shouting over Rubio that he was reclaiming his time.The House hearing brought Rubio to testify on the State Departments posture on protecting American interests. Throughout the hearing, Rubio asserted that any actions taken by the government must have measurable outcomes for the American people, specifically making the country safer, stronger or more prosperous.

President Donald Trump ripped an NBC reporter for questioning over the Department of Defense accepting a jumbo jet from Qatar to serve as Air Force One."The Pentagon announced that it would be accepting a Qatari jet to be used as Air Force One," an NBC reporter asked Trump during a press event during the South African president's Wednesday visit to the White House."What are you talking about? You know, you ought to get out of here," Trump responded.The question regarding the Qatari jet was asked immediately following Trump directing his staff to lower the lights and show video footage of the treatment of white farmers in South Africa during his meeting with the African nation's president.The Trump administration began welcoming white Afrikaners from South Africa to the U.S. in the past week as they face "unjust racial discrimination" in their home country, according to the administration."What does this have to do with the Qatari jet?" Trump shot back at the reporter, believed to be NBC News' Peter Alexander, before slamming NBC News for trying to divert the meeting's topic from genocide in South Africa.ESPIONAGE, CONSTITUTIONAL CONCERNS ABOUND FROM TRUMP DETRACTORS, ALLIES OVER QATARI JET OFFER"They're giving the United States Air Force a jet. Okay? And it's a great thing. We're talking about a lot of other things. It's NBC trying to get off the subject of what you just saw," Trump said. "You are a real you know, you're a terrible reporter. Number one, you don't have what it takes to be a reporter. You're not smart enough. But for you to go into a subject about a jet that was given to the United States Air Force, which is a very nice thing.""They also gave $5.1 trillion worth of investment in addition to the jet. Go back, you ought to go back to your studio at NBC because, Brian Roberts and the people that run that place, they ought to be investigated. They are so terrible the way you run that network. And you are a disgrace. No more questions from you," Trump continued."His name is Peter something. He's a terrible reporter," Trump added as he began calling on other reporters for questions.FLASHBACK: DEM CRITICAL OF TRUMP'S QATARI JET GIFT RODE CAMEL IN EXPENSES-PAID 2021 TRIP TO GULF EMIRATEFox News Digital reached out to NBC News for comment on the matter but did not immediately receive a reply.Fox News confirmed earlier Wednesday that the Department of Defense had formally accepted a 747 jetliner from Qatar.Both Democrats and Republicans have criticized Trump after he announced the Department of Defense planned to accept a jumbo jet from the government of Qatar earlier in May, arguing the gift is riddled with both espionage concerns and constitutional questions.HOUSE DEMOCRAT CALLS FOR 'IMMEDIATE' ETHICS PROBE OF QATARI PLANE GIFT TO TRUMPAt the heart of Democrats' concern over the matter is the emoluments clause in the Constitution, which states: "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."It's questionable if the emoluments clause even applies to the president, however, as the Constitution typically stipulates when a clause specifically affects a president and cites the title, such as in the impeachment clause, Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation's Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, previously told Fox News Digital.TRUMP CLARIFIES OWNERSHIP OF AIRCRAFT IN DEFENSE OF QATAR'S GIFT"The clause was specifically inserted because of concerns by the Founders at the Constitutional Convention over corruption of our foreign diplomats, especially by the French government,"von Spakovsky explained. "It is questionable whether the emoluments clause even applies to the president since he is not named and the Constitution usually names the president when a provision applies to him.That is why the impeachment clause specifically provides that it applies to the president, vice president and all civil officers of the United States. If officers of the U.S. included the president, there would be no need for him to be separately listed."Von Spakovsky said that if the plane is a government-to-government gift meaning if Qatar gifted the plane to the Department of Defense and not as a personal gift to the president the Trump administration is likely in the legal clear to accept the gift."If this gift is being considered as a gift to the government of the U.S., there is no legal issue to consider, since there is no constitutional or legal problem with such a gift.If this is a personal gift to the president, the Justice Department would be weighing the constitutional issue I have raised whether the emoluments clause even applies to the president," he said.TRUMP DEFENDS QATAR JUMBO JET OFFER AS TROUBLED BOEING FAILS TO DELIVER NEW AIR FORCE ONE FLEETTrump and his administration had previously and repeatedly defended that the jet would be gifted to the Department of Defense, and used as a temporary Air Force One as Boeing has not yet delivered a new fleet of Air Force ones."We're very disappointed that it's taking Boeing so long to build a new Air Force One," Trump said during a press conference on drug prices Monday morning. "You know, we have an Air Force One that's 40 years old. And if you take a look at that, compared to the new plane of the equivalent, you know, stature at the time, it's not even the same ballgame.""When I first came in, I signed an order to get (the new Air Force One fleet) built," he continued. "I took it over from the Obama administration, they had originally agreed. I got the price down much lower. And then, when the election didn't exactly work out the way that it should have, a lot of work was not done on the plane because a lot of people didn't know they made change orders. That was so stupid, so ridiculous. And it ended up being a total mess, a real mess."

President Donald Trump has officially accepted Qatars Boeing 747 jet gift to be refitted as Air Force One, the Pentagon revealed."The Secretary of Defense has accepted a Boeing 747 from Qatar in accordance with all federal rules and regulations," chief spokesperson Sean Parnell confirmed to Fox News. "The Department of Defense will work to ensure proper security measures and functional-mission requirements are considered for an aircraft used to transport the President of the United States. For additional information, we refer you to the United States Air Force."News of the deal had prompted concerns from lawmakers, both over how to retrofit a foreign nations plane to serve as a mobile Oval Office with the highest levels of security and over what Qatar might want from Trump in return for the gift.TRUMP CLARIFIES OWNERSHIP OF AIRCRAFT IN DEFENSE OF QATAR'S GIFTTrump ally Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has said the plane poses "significant espionage and surveillance problems" while liberal Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., declared, "Trump cannot accept a $400 million flying palace from the royal family of Qatar. Not only is this farcically corrupt, it is blatantly unconstitutional.""Qatar is not, in my opinion, a great ally. I mean, they support Hamas. So what I'm worried about is the safety of the president," Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., told reporters last week.Asked about the latest news, Trump told a reporter at the White House: "They're giving the United States Air Force a jet, okay, and it's a great thing.""You're a terrible reporter, You don't have what it takes to be a reporter," he said. TRUMP VISITS QATAR AS COUNTRY'S JET OFFER PUTS SPOTLIGHT ON NATION'S GROWING INFLUENCE IN WASHINGTONHe boasted that he'd secured $5.1 trillion in investments during his trip to the Middle East last week.Earlier, Trump had said of the criticisms: "So the fact that the Defense Department is getting a GIFT, FREE OF CHARGE, of a 747 aircraft to replace the 40 year old Air Force One, temporarily, in a very public and transparent transaction, so bothers the Crooked Democrats that they insist we pay, TOP DOLLAR, for the plane," Trump wrote. "Anybody can do that! The Dems are World Class Losers!!! MAGA."Trump in 2018 awarded Boeing a $3.9 billion fixed-price agreement to manufacture two new jets, after months of haggling over the price. The jets were supposed to be delivered in 2024, but the project is around five years behind schedule and already $2.5 billion over budget.Fox News' Liz Friden contributed to this report.