The San Francisco 49ers and star quarterback Brock Purdy reportedly have agreed to a five-year, $265 million contract extension on Friday, per ESPN.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COMPurdy, 25, goes from "Mr. Irrelevant" in the 2022 NFL Draft to one of the highest paid quarterbacks in the NFL.Purdy will reportedly receive $181 million in total guaranteed money, with $165.05 million of that coming in the first three years of the contract, per NFL Network. The contract runs through the 2030 season.In three seasons, Purdy has a 23-13 regular season record and made the Pro Bowl once. He is 4-2 in the playoffs.This is a breaking news story, check back for updates.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X, and subscribe tothe Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

The first-ever blood test to detect Alzheimers disease has been cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).In a Friday press release, the agency announced its approval of the first in-vitro diagnostic device, Lumipulse.The method is intended for early Alzheimers detection in adult patients over the age of 55 who are exhibiting signs and symptoms of the disease.ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE COULD BE PREVENTED ANTIVIRAL DRUG ALREADY ON MARKETThe new technology works by detecting amyloid plaques in the brain, a telltale sign of Alzheimers.While PET scans can pick up these plaques, they can be "costly and time-consuming" while exposing patients to radiation, according to the FDA.The new Lumipulse device reduces the need for a PET scan or other invasive testing, the agency said.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTERIn a clinical study of 499 plasma samples from cognitively impaired adults, the Lumipulse test detected the presence of amyloid plaques in 91.7% of individuals.The results indicate that the new blood test can "reliably predict the presence or absence of amyloid pathology associated with Alzheimers disease at the time of the test in patients who are cognitively impaired," the FDA concluded.The FDA noted the risk of false positive test results from Lumipulse, which could lead to inappropriate diagnosis and unnecessary treatment.FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., MPH, wrote in a statement, "Alzheimers disease impacts too many people, more than breast cancer and prostate cancer combined."For more Health articles, visitwww.foxnews.com/health"Knowing that 10% of people aged 65 and older have Alzheimer's, and that by 2050 that number is expected to double, I am hopeful that new medical products such as this one will help patients," he said.Center for Devices and Radiological Health Director Michelle Tarver, M.D., PhD, also commented in the press release that nearly seven million Americans are living with Alzheimers."And this number is projected to rise to nearly 13 million," she said."Todays clearance is an important step for Alzheimers disease diagnosis, making it easier and potentially more accessible for U.S. patients earlier in the disease."

Blake Lively and Taylor Swifts friendship is reportedly taking a backseat as the actress continues with her legal battle against Justin Baldoni.Sources told People Swift and Livelys friendship "has halted" as the world-famous musician faces a possible subpoena from Baldonis legal team."Their friendship has halted. Taylor wants no part in this drama," a source told the outlet.JUSTIN BALDONI CLAIMS BLAKE LIVELY THREATENED TAYLOR SWIFT IN ESCALATING IT ENDS WITH US LEGAL BATTLEA second source told the outlet Swift and Lively are "taking some space," but clarified that they are "notno longer friends."Swift was served a subpoena by Baldonis team May 8. A source told People at the time that the legal battle has "fractured" the "fragile peace"in their friendship. Swift is the godmother of Lively and Ryan Reynolds' four children.Gigi Hadid, another woman in Lively and Swifts close friend circle, has reportedly taken Swifts side through the legal mess."Gigi feels terrible that her close friend is being pulled into the legal drama," a source told People.Another source added, "Gigi is closer to Taylor and has definitely taken her side in this whole drama. Gigi doesn't want to get involved in this whole ordeal, but she is closer to Taylor and has distanced herself from Blake, although she still considers her a friend."Representatives for Lively and Swift did not immediately respond to Fox News Digitals request for comment.Earlier this week, Baldonis team filed a document claiming the "It Ends With Us" actress threatened Swift if she didnt publicly support Lively during Lively's legal battle against her co-star,People reported.Livelyslawyer, Mike Gottlieb, shared a statement with Fox News Digital calling Baldonis claim "categorically false.""We unequivocally deny all of these so-called allegations, which are cowardly sourced to supposed anonymous sources and completely untethered from reality. This is what we have come to expect from the Wayfarer parties lawyers, who appear to love nothing more than shooting first, without any evidence, and with no care for the people they are harming in the process," Gottlieb said.JUSTIN BALDONI SUES BLAKE LIVELY, RYAN REYNOLDS FOR $400M AFTER ACTRESS ACCUSED HIM OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT"We will imminently file motions with the court to hold these attorneys accountable for their misconduct here."Gottlieb stuck to his word and filed a motion to get Baldonis letter dismissed. According to court documents obtained by Fox News Digital, the motion was granted.A spokesperson for Lively told Fox News Digital, "It took the court less than 24 hours to see through [Baldoni's lawyer] Mr. [Bryan] Freedman'sirrelevant, improper and inflammatory accusations, strike them, remove them from the court and warn Mr. Freedman that further misconduct may be met with sanctions."Baldonis team wrote in the letter filed May 14 that it believes subpoenaing Swift is necessary for this case."The Lively Defendants' insistence that the Subpoena seeks irrelevant information is wrong," Freedman wrote.Freedman wrote that he received a tip from an anonymous "source who is highly likely to have reliable information." Freedman said the source shared that Lively asked Swift to delete specific text messages.Freedman also alleged that Livelys lawyers contacted Swifts legal team "and demanded that Ms. Swift release a statement of support for Ms. Lively." He also said they were "intimating that if Ms. Swift refused to do so, private text messages of a personal nature in Ms. Lively's possession would be released."A representative for Baldoni did not respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.LIKE WHAT YOURE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSOn May 9,Swift was subpoenaedas a witness in the Lively-Baldoni legal battle.Shortly after the news became public, a spokesperson for Swift denied the pop star had any connection to the 2024 film aside from the licensing of her song "My Tears Ricochet," which was featured in the movie's trailer and used in one scene."Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie. She was not involved in any casting or creative decisions. She did not score the film. She never saw an edit or made any notes on the film. She did not even see It Ends With Us until weeks after its public release and was traveling around the globe during 2023 and 2024, headlining the biggest tour in history," Swift's representative previously told Fox News Digital."The connection Taylor had to this film was permitting the use of one song, My Tears Ricochet,'" the spokesperson added. "Given that her involvement was licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document subpoena is designed to use Taylor Swifts name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case."Lively and Baldoni starred together in the romance drama "It Ends with Us," which was based on Colleen Hoover's 2016 book and premiered in August 2024. After a press tour rife with rumors ofbehind-the-scenes issuesbetween the two, Baldoni and Lively filed lawsuits against each other.In January, Baldoni accused Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, of civil extortion, defamation and more in a $400 million lawsuit, which mentioned Swift.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTERThe "Jane the Virgin" star's lawsuit followed Lively's December lawsuitaccusing Baldoni of sexual harassmentwhile filming "It Ends With Us." However, Baldoni insisted Lively "falsely" accused him in an attempt to repair her reputation from the fallout from the movie's press tour after she allegedly took control of the film.In an attempt to prove his claims that Lively had taken control of the movie's production, Baldoni's legal team suggested the actress had used her friendship with the globally famous Swift to threaten him.While working on the film, Lively insisted on rewriting the infamous rooftop scene. Baldoni had been hesitant about the idea, but he told the actress he would "take a look at what she put together," according to the complaint.Both sides have given no indication they intend to settle out of court. Thelegal conflictis scheduled to go to trial in New York in March 2026.

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of an appeal by a group of Venezuelan migrants who asked the high court to halt their deportation under the Alien Enemies Act.The ruling, similar to others it has made in the past on the matter, revolved around the alleged illegal immigrants not having enough time to reasonably file a challenge to their deportations.President Donald Trump has been using the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to try and speed up the deportation processes of illegal immigrants, but the Supreme Court's Friday ruling presents another blow to those attempts after the court ruled against the Trump administration in their attempts to remove men already in immigration custody in a northern region of Texas."Under these circumstances, notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster. But it is not optimal for this Court, far removed from the circumstances on the ground, to determine in the first instance the precise process necessary to satisfy the Constitution in this case. We remand the case to the Fifth Circuit for that purpose," the opinion from the court reads.The court did not rule on whether the AEA was lawful but rather send the matter back to the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals."To be clear, we decide today only that the detainees are entitled to more notice than was given on April 18," the Supreme Court's ruling said.

A bronze statue of Melania Trump was sawed off at the ankles and stolen this week in the first ladys native Slovenia, police said.The statue replaced a wooden one that was erected near her hometown of Sevnica in 2020 at the end of President Donald Trumps first term after it was targeted in an arson attack.Both statues were a collaboration between Brad Downey, an artist from Kentucky, and a local craftsman, Ales "Maxi" Zupevc.The original figure, made ofwood andcut from the trunk of a linden tree, portrayed the first lady in a pale blue dress, similar to the one she wore at Trumps 2016 inauguration.FIRST LADY MELANIA TRUMP TURNS 55: HER LIFE IN PHOTOS, FROM SLOVENIA TO WHITE HOUSEThe newstatue was placed on the same stump as the old one and modeled after theprevious design.In July 2020, Downey said the statue would be made "as solid as possible, out of a durable material which cannot be wantonly destroyed," according to The Guardian.Slovenian police spokesperson Alenka Drenik Rangussaid Friday that police were investigating after the vandalism and theft were reported Tuesday.Franja Kranjc, a worker at a bakery that sells cakes with the first ladys name in support of her, told The Associated Press the rustic likeness wasnt well liked.WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY SAYS STATUE OF LIBERTY GOING NOWHERE, REPLIES TO FRENCH POLITICIAN"I think no one was really proud at this statue, not even the first lady of the USA," Kranjc said. "So, I think its OK that it's removed."Zupevc said he and Melania Trump were born in the same hospital, which partly inspired himto create the design.Hecarved the statue with a chainsawand sanded it with a power tool."I plugged in my angle grinder. I worked and made mistakes finished the hair the eyes and all. Then, I called my brother, who said, Spitting image of our waitress. And so it was," Zupevc said during a documentary filmby Downey on the making of the original statue.A plaque next to the statue says it is "dedicated to the eternal memory of a monument to Melania which stood at this location."Born Melanija Knavs in nearby Novo Mesto in 1970, the first lady grew up in Sevnica while Slovenia was part of the Communist-ruled former Yugoslavia. An Alpine nation of 2 million people, Slovenia is now a member of the European Union and NATO.CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPThe Associated Press contributed to this report.

Howard Stern has made it clear: if he isnt sitting in the front row at Madison Square Garden watching the New York Knicks, then he isnt going at all.Stern, 71, is not known to be the biggest sports fan, but does support the Knicks, who hold a 3-2 series lead over the defending champion Boston Celtics in the Eastern Conference semifinals.Yet despite the teams playoff success, Stern will not be a part of the raucous Madison Square Garden crowd unless he gets front row seats.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM"You can tell your place in show business by where they place you at the Knicks game. The day they put me in the second row, I quit. Because I consider myself a first-row type person," Stern said on "The Howard Stern Show.""Im very aware of where they seat me, and its very important to me. If they said to me, Look, youre not gonna be in the first row, Id turn around and leave. It would be embarrassing to me."Stern does have interest in going to an upcoming Knicks playoff game, but will only attend if his requirements are met.KNICKS' JOSH HART SUFFERS BLOODY CUT OVER EYE IN TEAM'S LOSS TO CELTICS"I have tremendous interest, but I wouldnt go. Im very self-conscious. I wait for them to invite me," Stern said."I dont want to take advantage and I know everyone comes out of the woodwork for the Finals. I dont want to be that guy. I prefer when the Knicks are dead last, then I dont feel guilty taking the tickets because nobody wants to go."While he would like to go to a game, if invited, the longtime host does not have a lot of faith in the Knicks knocking off the Celtics and moving on."I still feel like the Knicks are gonna blow it. I get agita with that team," Stern said.The Celtics won Game 5 at the TD Garden in Boston 127-105 despite not having star player Jayson Tatum due to an Achilles injury he suffered at the end of Game 4.The Knicks have another chance to clinch the series on Friday at 8 p.m. ET, when the series returns to Madison Square Garden. The team has not made the conference finals since 2000.Follow Fox News Digitals sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Welcome to the Fox News Politics newsletter, with the latest updates on the Trump administration, Capitol Hill and more Fox News politics content.Here's what's happening-Trump wraps momentous Middle East trip with economic deals, Syria sanctions relief and warning to Iran-Handful of Republicans sink Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in key House committee-Trump appointee Barrett challenges admin on nationwide injunctions, surprises and delights liberalsPresident Donald Trump slammed Bruce Springsteen as being "highly overrated" on Friday after the rocker called his administration "corrupt, incompetent and treasonous.""I see that Highly Overrated Bruce Springsteen goes to a Foreign Country to speak badly about the President of the United States. Never liked him, never liked his music, or his Radical Left Politics and, importantly, hes not a talented guy Just a pushy, obnoxious JERK, who fervently supported Crooked Joe Biden, a mentally incompetent FOOL, and our WORST EVER President, who came close to destroying our Country," Trump wrote on Truth Social.Springsteen tore into Trump on Wednesday during the first of a series of concerts in Manchester,EnglandREAD MOREDEMOCRATS GRILLED: Democratic presidential hopefuls grapple with Biden's legacy as 2028 race begins'IT'S TIME': Trump wants to meet Putin 'as soon as we can set it up' to discuss Ukraine war'QAT' A DEAL: Trump secures deals with 3 Middle Eastern nations in first major trip of second termAFGHANS ALIENATED: Afghans for Trump group feels abandoned after administration revokes refugee protectionsWORLD COURT SCANDAL: ICC prosecutor behind Netanyahu arrest warrants steps aside amid sexual misconduct probeLIFE OR DEATH: Zelenskyy speaks with Trump, allies after Russia peace talks broker no ceasefire'POLITICALLY MOTIVATED': Israel turns tables on UN official claiming 'genocide' in Gaza with basic questions'SERIOUS QUESTIONS': House GOP targets another Dem official accused of blocking ICE amid Delaney Hall fallout'TAIL WAGGING THE DOG': Nationwide injunction opponents lament judges rewriting the Constitution every other ThursdayCHARGES DISMISSED: Federal magistrate judge dismisses trespassing charges against 98 arrested in new military zone'KING OF KINGS': Kennedy Center expands family-focused religious programming, starts with free kick-off eventGet the latest updates on the Trump administration and Congress, exclusive interviews and more on FoxNews.com.

Former Minnesota Vikings and University of Minnesota football player Jack Brewer shared a grievance with Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison.The AG is waging a legal battle against President Donald Trump and the Department of Justice to ensure transgender athletes can continue participating in girls sports in the state. The state's ongoing defiance of Trump's executive order to keep girls sports female has resulted in a controversy involving a transgender pitcher who has dominated a girls softball season."Clearly, Keith Ellison, the attorney general of Minnesota, has never played any major sports," Brewer told Fox News Digital."Its like hes never stepped foot in a real locker room, especially not one where the sport demanded true athleticism, grit and toughness. Its embarrassing to watch a Black man stand before the nation and promote boys competing against girls."CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COMThe White House has responded to the lawsuit, condemning Ellison for taking legal action to enable trans inclusion."Why would a grown man sue the Trump administration to allow other biological males to participate in womens sports? This is creepy and anti-woman," White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told Fox News Digital.Brewer played four seasons for the Golden Gophers from 1998-2001, then started his NFL career with the Vikings in 2002. He also raised his children in the state.HOW TRANSGENDERISM IN SPORTS SHIFTED THE 2024 ELECTION AND IGNITED A NATIONAL COUNTERCULTURE"The state has veered so far off course that its doing the exact opposite of what it once stood for. It used to be a national leader on Title IX and womens rights. Now, its destroying womens sports, degrading women and promoting situations where men are physically dominating women," Brewer said."Its heartbreaking for any former Gopher, any former Viking, any professional athlete whos lived in that great city. Its embarrassing. Its shocking. And, to be honest, its just devastating."Reports of a trans softball pitcher winning 14 straight games heading into the playoffs and earning first-team All-State honors rocked the state in recent weeks.For Brewer, it is a difficult situation to witness as a Minnesota resident and former pro athlete."In any sport especially something like softball people can get seriously hurt. A man hits the ball harder. A man throws the ball faster. So, the idea of allowing men to compete in womens softball especially now, when that sport has grown in visibility and opportunity is insane," Brewer said."Womens softball is one of the fastest-growing sports in America. If every high school varsity baseball player decided to go play Division I womens softball, there would be no women left on the field. Anyone who supports that agenda is either ignorant or pushing politics over people."And thats exactly what Keith Ellison is doing. They dont care about the girls. They care about fundraising and staying in power, and theyre doing it at the expense of young athletes all across America."President Trump understands exactly whats happening. He said it best. If you put a bunch of MLB players on a womens softball team, theyd win the championship."Ellison made the announcement of the lawsuit at a press conference after months of the state defying Trump's "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports" executive order. Ellison claimed he received notice from the Department of Justice threatening legal action if the state did not follow the executive order."I'm not going to sit around waiting for the Trump administration to sue Minnesota. Today, Minnesota is suing him and his administration because we will not participate in this shameful bullying," Ellison said. "We will not let a small group of vulnerable children who are only trying be healthy and live their lives be demonized."Ellison's lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis, argues the Trump administration does not have the authority to set states' athletic gender eligibility policies through an executive order.Minnesota is the first state to sue the Department of Justice over threats of funding cuts for allowing trans athletes to play in girls sports and the second state to sue the Trump administration over the issue.Maine filed a lawsuit against Trump after the Department of Agriculture cut funding to the state April 2, and a federal judge has already ruled the USDA must release the funding to Maine.After Trump's executive order, the Minnesota State High School League announced it would defy federal law by allowing transgender athletes to continue playing in women's sports.Ellison's office said "based on the plain language of the statute, educational institutions and the Minnesota State High School League would violate the MHRA by prohibiting transgender athletes from participating in extracurricular activities consistent with their gender identity."Minnesota's state legislature failed to pass the Preserving Girls Sports Act in early March, which would have stated that "only female students may participate in an elementary or secondary school level athletic team or sport that an educational institution has restricted to women and girls."A New York Times/Ipsos survey found the vast majority of Americans, including a majority of Democrats, don't think transgender athletes should be permitted to compete in women's sports.Of the 2,128 people who participated, 79% said biological males who identify as women should not be allowed to participate in women's sports. Of the 1,025 people who identified as Democrats or leaning Democratic, 67% said transgender athletes should not be allowed to compete with women.Follow Fox News Digitals sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis excoriated Trump administration lawyers Friday in a remarkable status hearing centered on Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, the Salvadorian migrant and alleged MS-13 member who was deported from Maryland to El Salvador in March in what administration officials have acknowledged was an administrative error.The heated back-and-forth was full of eye-popping exchanges between the judge and the Justice Department, as she took umbrage with their attempts to invoke the state secrets privilege to shield details concerning Abrego Garcia from the court."What world are we living in," Xinis asked in disbelief after more than two hours of proceedings. "What sort of legal world are we living in?"She sparred multiple times with DOJ lawyers over their assertion that Abrego Garcia was lawfully detained and deported.JUSTICE KAGAN SNAPS AT TRUMP LAWYER IN MAJOR CASE: 'EVERY COURT HAS RULED AGAINST YOU'"He was lawfully detained? No he wasnt!" Judge Xinis objected. "There was no order of removal, there was no warrant for removal there was nothing."She cut off Justice Department attorney Jonathan Guynn again when he attempted to continue with a different argument. "You didnt even respond to what I just said," she told him. "A DHS attorney came in at the first hearing and confirmed that there was no lawful basis to arrest Abrego Garcia.""Why are we skipping over that as part of the misconduct at issue, in light of the pattern I'm currently faced with on this day?" she asked, in disbelief.For at least 30 seconds, the courtroom fell completely silent.The judge said she would issue an order later Friday outlining next steps, after the two sides huddled for a closed portion of the case.Xinis, who, despite her mounting frustrations, seemed likely to grant the government another deadline extension, described the hours-long hearing as beating a "frustrated and dead horse."At one point, she rebuked the Justice Department for trying to invoke the state secrets privilege via a footnote referencing a filing in a separate case before a different court, noting that this would not pass muster in her courtroom.Most of the public hearing was marked by similar sharp exchanges over whether the Trump administration had taken any steps to comply with court orders to facilitate Abrego Garcias return a point Xinis reiterated was already settled by both her court and the Supreme Court last month.At another contentious moment, she laughed in apparent disbelief at the lack of evidence and disclosures from the government. "I cant count the number of I dont knows my wonderful clerks and I have heard," she said of depositions from Trump administration officials.FEDERAL JUDGE JAMES BOASBERG FINDS PROBABLE CAUSE TO HOLD TRUMP IN CONTEMPT OVER DEPORTATION FLIGHTSXinis told the government lawyers they had not presented her with a sufficient affidavit to invoke the state secrets privilege which the Trump administration has asserted is necessary in this case to protect sensitive diplomatic and foreign policy matters from being made public in court.Pointing to a prior admission from the Trump administration, Xinis also said Abrego Garcia was removed from the U.S. "without lawful authority.""Youve conceded it. Theres witness testimony," she said. Any attempt to revise this "would be exceptionally difficult.""Respectfully, your honor, he was removed lawfully," Guynn replied."No," an incredulous Xinis shot back. "He was removed unlawfully.""His removal from the U.S. was lawful," the Justice Department attorney insisted."Well no no it wasnt," Xinis said, visibly stunned.TRUMP'S REMARKS COULD COME BACK TO BITE HIM IN ABREGO GARCIA DEPORTATION BATTLE"Because there's actually the [Immigration and Naturalization Act], which says that if the United States elects to remove someone to a third country, there's a process. Congress has set out that process, the executive has to follow that process.," she said. "So it is not determined yet whether removal to a third country would be appropriate, which is why the Supreme Court ruled the way it did."Ultimately, she said, the government will likely have extra time to file additional declarations to allow it to seek the state secrets privilege.Still, she said she "has to point out" that the unlawful removal of Abrego Garcia from the U.S. "is a foregone conclusion.""He was removed in error. He was sent to El Salvador when there was a notice of withholding of removal, and so that was not lawful."Plaintiffs noted that the government had labeled 1,140 documents related to Abrego Garcias case as privileged but in contrast, they were sent just 164 documents 132 of which were photocopies of their own court filings and interrogatories sent back to them."Your Honor, a life is in the balance," Abrego Garcia's lawyers said, urging the court to move faster.Xinis previously criticized the administration for failing to comply with her courts requests for information in the case accusing officials in a blistering eight-page order of submitting"vague, evasive and incomplete" responses that she said demonstrated "willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations."

The San Francisco 49ers and star quarterback Brock Purdy reportedly have agreed to a five-year, $265 million contract extension on Friday, per ESPN.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COMPurdy, 25, goes from "Mr. Irrelevant" in the 2022 NFL Draft to one of the highest paid quarterbacks in the NFL.Purdy will reportedly receive $181 million in total guaranteed money, with $165.05 million of that coming in the first three years of the contract, per NFL Network. The contract runs through the 2030 season.In three seasons, Purdy has a 23-13 regular season record and made the Pro Bowl once. He is 4-2 in the playoffs.This is a breaking news story, check back for updates.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X, and subscribe tothe Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.