OREM, Utah The murder case against the man accused of killing conservative speaker Charlie Kirk is already facing major legal hurdles from questions about defense funding to whether the crime even qualifies for the death penalty under Utah law.Tyler Robinson, 22, is being held without bail at the Utah County Jail. Prosecutors say he climbed onto a rooftop at Utah Valley University, shot Kirk from about 200 yards away and fled before surrendering near his home in Washington, Utah.Defending Robinson is proving to be no simple task. Utah requires attorneys in death penalty cases to have prior trial and capital case experience, and at least two must be appointed. That level of commitment can consume a year or more of full-time work, experts told Fox News Digital, forcing lawyers to set aside other clients and personal obligations."Its a huge undertaking to represent someone in a case like this," Utah criminal defense lawyer Randall Spencer, who has handled multiple capital cases, told Fox News Digital. "It really is a sacrifice for defense attorneys who take on this kind of work."'WHAT WOULD JESUS DO?' UTAH STUDENTS TORN ON DEATH PENALTY FOR CHARLIE KIRK'S ACCUSED KILLERSpencer said counties typically pay far less than the true cost of such representation, and the work is often underfunded. If qualified local counsel cant be found, the court can admit outside attorneys though Spencer expects Utah will provide experienced in-state representation."There will be very good counsel found, likely within Utah," Spencer said.But others warn the state isnt well-prepared to quickly handle a case of this scale. Randolph Rice, another veteran attorney, said Utahs system leaves significant gaps."The current contract between Utah County and the Public Defender Association doesnt cover the costs of hiring a death penalty lawyer and experts," Rice said. "That means separate contracts, and ultimately, taxpayers footing the bill."Even lower-cost cases require years of work and specialized experts from mental health evaluators to jury consultants, Rice said.CHARGING DOCUMENTS TO REVEAL NEXT PHASE IN KIRK ASSASSINATION PROBE AS SUSPECT EXPECTED IN COURT"This isnt just another file," Rice said. "The lawyer has to ask: Can I realistically set aside every other case to devote the thousands of hours this will take?""This is a case which will be all-consuming and will take up 24 hours a day for a long time because, I know from experience, even when they're (defense lawyers) sleeping, this case is going to be going through their minds constantly," Spencer emphasized on the scale of taking on a case like this.Legal experts caution that pursuing capital punishment may not be straightforward. Utah law requires specific aggravating factors such as killing a law enforcement officer or creating a great risk to others."I dont believe this is a slam-dunk death penalty case," Spencer said, noting the defense will likely argue no one beyond Kirk was at risk. Prosecutors may rely on the "great risk to others" theory, a strategy Spencer said could face significant challenges in court.UTAH PROSECUTORS PREPARE POTENTIAL DEATH PENALTY CASE AGAINST CHARLIE KIRK SUSPECT TYLER JAMES ROBINSONOne major factor potentially shaping the outcome of Robinson's case is the testimony of the victims widow, Erica Kirk, who has publicly offered forgiveness towards Robinson."The reality is that death penalty casestake a heavy toll on the family of the deceased," Spencer said. "Her position could absolutely influence how prosecutors proceed. We've seen similar cases where families voices helped lead to a life-without-parole deal."Defense attorneys also face heavy scrutiny in cases involving public figures, including media coverage, community outrage and even threats."A lawyer must be prepared for the personal and professional toll of being in that spotlight," Rice said.DEATH PENALTY LOOMS FOR CHARLIE KIRKS ACCUSED KILLER BUT LEGAL BAR IS HIGH AS TRUMP, COX MOUNT PRESSUREEven if the death penalty is pursued, Spencer said the process could take years, with long appeals and significant emotional strain for everyone involved.Robinson is set to appear in Utah County court on Sept. 29 for a hearing where he must decide whether to challenge the evidence at a preliminary hearing or proceed directly to arraignment. If the case advances, Rice said the court will determine probable cause before Robinson enters a plea.Even if prosecutors pursue the death penalty, experts said appeals and delays could stretch the case out for years. More likely, they noted, Robinson could eventually agree to a plea deal to avoid trial."The system will play out in a fair way," Spencer said.Utah Gov. Spencer Cox has said that the state plans to seek the death penalty if the case moves forward to trial. President Donald Trump also weighed in, saying he hopes Robinson receives the death penalty if convicted.

The family of Casey Crafton has filed the first lawsuit over the American Eagle Flight 5342 crash in the Potomac River near Washington, D.C., alleging the disaster was avoidable and caused by systemic negligence.The Jan. 29 crash involved an Army Black Hawk helicopter that collided midair with an American Airlines passenger plane near Ronald Reagan Washington International Airport, killing 64 people on the American Eagle flight and three aboard the military helicopter.The federal lawsuit was filed on behalf of Casey Craftons estate, with his wife Rachel and family leading the legal action."Our lives were shattered in a moment," said Dailey Crafton, Crafton's brother. "Casey was betrayed by systemic disregard for safety. We cannot stand by and allow his life to be lost in vain."MILITARY HELICOPTER CRASHES IN WASHINGTON STATE NEAR JOINT BASE LEWIS-MCCHORDThe lawsuit accuses American Airlines and PSA Airlines of negligence in operations, training, and knowingly allowing dangerous conditions at DCA, noting the crash was predictable and preventable.American Airlines allegedly ignored repeated near misses and congestion data, prioritizing profit over safety, according to attorneys."The crash of American Eagle 5342 was predictable, preventable, and caused the needless loss of 67 lives," said attorney Robert Clifford. " American ran red lights for years by allowing these planes to operate in congested, unsafe conditions."ARMY HELICOPTER THAT CRASHED WITH COMMERCIAL PLANE IN DC WAS FLYING ABOVE ALTITUDE LIMIT: NTSBAction will also be brought against the U.S. government, encompassing the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the U.S. Army, for systemic failures in oversight, air traffic control and military helicopter procedures.Attorneys said the FAA failed to provide safe air traffic control and allowed unsafe operational environments, while the Army helicopter crew failed to follow basic "see and avoid" flight principles."The helicopter crews conduct was inexcusable," said Brian Alexander, an attorney and former Army aviator. "Air traffic control completely failed in their duty as the lifeguards of our aviation system."Before suing the government, families must first file separate Form 95 claims, which attorneys said have already been filed by nearly all the victims' families.The Crafton case is expected to serve as a guiding complaint for other victims families, which are expected to be consolidated in federal court.Doug Lane, who lost his wife, Christine, and son, Spencer, in the crash, said more than 120 family members have banded together to "become something both beautiful and powerful.""We support each other through birthdays, anniversaries, holidays, weddingsthat were planned but never held," Lane said. "Little League and figure skating seasons that started with missing coaches, missing competitors, and missing parents in the stands."NTSB LAUNCHES 3-DAY INVESTIGATIVE HEARING ON DEADLY DC PLANE CRASHHe said the group has also "turned our grief into action.""We've collaborated with Congress on critical air safety reforms. We've secured a much-needed set of oversight investigations into the FAA, and we will not rest until similar investigations are underway into the US Army," Lane said. "We'll bring that same level of passion and relentlessness as we seek accountability and change through the legal process."Many of us have been asked whether we dread the idea of rehashing the worst days of our lives in court. Our answer today is clear: We're ready. We are here to see this process through, however long it takes, to ensure that our family members have a lasting legacy that makes the world safer for everyone who flies."The lawsuit is seeking both monetary damages and congressional air safety reforms.

Some in the football world are concerned about Tom Brady being both a minority owner of the Las Vegas Raiders and a FOX Sports color commentator during the NFL season.The future Hall of Famer explained why he views those people as "paranoid and distrustful."In Bradys weekly "Do Your Job" newsletter, he wrote about the discussion regarding his two roles.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM"I love football. At its core, it is a game of principle," he began. "And with all the success it has given me, I feel I have a moral and ethical duty to the sport, which is why the point where my roles in it intersect is not actually a point of conflict, despite what the paranoid and distrustful might believe. Rather, its the place from which my ethical duty emerges: to grow, evolve and improve the game that has given me everything."People who believe the intersection is a conflict of interest point to the fact that Brady has access to other teams around the NFL due to his broadcasting role. Other owners dont get to have the type of conversations Brady and his partner, play-by-play announcer Kevin Burkhardt, have on a weekly basis as they prepare for "Americas Game of the Week."BRONCOS' SEAN PAYTON TALKS OPPORTUNITY TO COACH TOM BRADY IN INTERNATIONAL FLAG FOOTBALL TOURNAMENTThat debate was heightened when Week 2s "Monday Night Football" broadcast on ESPN picked up Brady with a headset on in a Raiders' booth during their game against the Los Angeles Chargers.The NFL addressed that situation in a statement the next day, saying Brady is "prohibited from going to a team facility for practices or production meetings." However, he is allowed to sit in the coaches booth during games, according to the league.When Brady began broadcasting for FOX, the league put limitations on what he could do after becoming a minority owner of the Raiders. His deal with Las Vegas was approved by league owners in October 2024.But the league has softened those limitations, with a main one being Bradys allowance in production meetings. During these sessions, the broadcast team meets with head coaches and key players from each team playing that week. Brady must do so remotely, but he is still allowed in the session.Brady, though, isnt allowed to be present for practice at those teams facilities during the week.The seven-time Super Bowl champion takes both roles very seriously, which is why he doesnt want to jeopardize either one."If I can bring my knowledge and experience to bear inside the Raiders organization to ensure theres one more team that does things the right way, and then I can apply it in the booth so millions of people know and enjoy what the right way looks like, then I will have lived up to the expectations I have for myself, and I will have done so in service of a much greater duty," he wrote in his newsletter."When you live through uncertain and untrusting times like we are today, it is very easy to watch a persons passions and profession intersect, and to believe youre looking at some sort of dilemma. Because when youre blinded by distrust, its hard to see anything other than self-interest."Brady and Burkhardt will be in the booth for the Baltimore RavensKansas City Chiefs matchup in Week 4.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X, and subscribe tothe Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom was pressed Wednesday on his anti-ICE rhetoric and victory lap over a landmark state law prohibiting law enforcement from concealing their identity during official operations.Hours before a sniper fired "indiscriminately" at the Sally Port of a Dallas ICE facility, killing at least two detainees allegedly using ammunition inscribed with anti-ICE messages, Newsom joined CBS "Late Show" to lambast President Donald Trump and the way he has conducted his mass deportation operations.Fox News Digital asked Newsom on Wednesday morning for his response to the shooting and whether his anti-ICE rhetoric has fueled rising threats and attacks on Homeland Security agents.Newsom spokeswoman Diana Crofts-Pelayo responded that "violence is never the answer, and we expressly condemn what happened in Texas this morning."5 TIMES DEMOCRATS BLASTED ICE WITH HARSH RHETORIC"Our thoughts are with the victims and their families. As we begin to understand exactly what has happened, we must continue advocating for peace and justice in times of division."Fox News Digital pressed Newsom on whether he regrets his anti-ICE rhetoric and his support for a new, Democrat-led state law he signed Saturday prohibiting masks and other implements used to obscure ICE officers identities.Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, separately slammed Newsom -- along with Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y. -- after the Dallas ICE shooting, saying his "rhetoric must end."Meanwhile, Vice President JD Vance proclaimed that "if your rhetoric encourages violence you can go straight to Hell."HOUSE REPUBLICANS WARN ANTI-ICE RHETORIC FROM DEMOCRATS IS DRIVING VIOLENT ATTACKS ON AGENTSNewsom had criticized the Trump administration for what he considered federal overreach in the mass arrests of Californians, while also saying that people should retain their First Amendment right to speak freely and criticize their government.He, however, has also been criticized by conservatives for the about-face on masking-up in public, only a few years after his administration implemented public mask mandates during the coronavirus pandemic.On CBS, Newsom recounted the detention of a teenager outside a school, describing it as "men jumping out of unmarked cars. People disappearing. No due process. No oversight. Zero accountability: Happening in the United States of America today."NEWSOM BANS LAW ENFORCEMENT FROM WEARING MASKS, TAUNTS ICE AGENTS: 'WHAT ARE YOU AFRAID OF?'"People ask: Well, is authoritarianism you being hyperbolic? Bulls--- were being hyperbolic These are not just authoritarian tendencies, these are authoritarian actions by an authoritarian government," Newsom told host Stephen Colbert."ICE: unmask what are you afraid of?" Newsom asked rhetorically at a press conference earlier this week announcing the first-in-the-nation law banning law enforcement from obscuring their identities.He previously blasted Trump and the Department of Homeland Security during a spate of immigration raids in Los Angeles earlier this summer.The architect of those raids, Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino, has since shifted his focus to Chicago, where leaders are echoing Newsoms criticisms of the feds.Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said at a recent press conference that the U.S., under Trump, looks as if the Confederacy had won the Civil War.

If you struggle with road rage, you're not just in good company. You're in the overwhelming majority.A recent study from the American Automobile Association (AAA) Foundation for Traffic Safety found that 96% of drivers admitted to engaging in "aggressive driving behaviors" over the past year.The behavior isn't only dangerous. It's also contagious, AAA said in a Sept. 23 news release.LAS VEGAS BECOMING 'PLAYGROUND FOR THE AFFLUENT' AS 'EVERYDAY TRAVELER' LEFT BEHIND"The study found that the more drivers are exposed to aggressive behavior on the road, the more likely they are to drive aggressively themselves," AAA's statement said."This self-fulfilling cycle of aggressive driving and road rage is fueling a culture where impatience and hostility are becoming the norm behind the wheel."Specifically, 92% of drivers said they'd recently engaged in aggressive behaviors that endangered others, such as speeding or cutting off other cars.Only 11% of drivers in the study admitted to violent road rage behaviors in the last year, such as bumping other cars on purpose or confronting other drivers.GOLF CARTS CALLED 'PLAGUE' AS NEIGHBORHOODS CLASH OVER GROWING TREND IN AMERICAThe study also found that car type could impact driver behavior.Drivers in sports cars, trucks and motorcycles were observed as more confrontational, saying they felt "more powerful and dominant behind the wheel."The study also found that encouraging good road etiquette was the "most effective way to reduce aggressive driving and road rage," with small actions such as using turn signals, letting others merge and waving to fellow drivers to help lower the heat in tense situations.MAN IN CAR CALLS HIS WIFE 'WORST BACKSEAT DRIVER,' SPARKING SOCIAL MEDIA DEBATE"Drivers feel shielded by two tons of metal and glass, which emboldens them to act in ways they never would face to face," Jonathan Alpert, a psychotherapist based in New York City, told Fox News Digital."I advise my patients to ask themselves the following: 'If I did not have the armor of the car to protect me, how would I deal with this?' That simple shift in perspective can defuse a lot of anger."To avoid road rage, Alpert recommended drivers play calming music, take a few deep breaths and try not to villainize other drivers.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER"Remember that arriving late is better than arriving in handcuffs," he said. "See the driver who cut you off not as a personal enemy but as a flawed human who made a mistake. And leave earlier so you are not already carrying stress before you even hit traffic."Alpert said road rage warrants professional help when it becomes a pattern."If someone routinely tailgates on purpose, blocks other cars or tries to intimidate people, that is no longer just bad manners," he said.MORE FROM FOX NEWS LIFESTYLE"It is a warning sign of deeper issues such as unresolved frustration, impulse problems or difficulty handling stress. Good therapy can help with that."Ultimately, road rage will always tell you more about yourself than other drivers, Alpert said."If you see everyone on the road as an enemy, your body will react with fight or flight," he observed. "If you see other drivers as people who make mistakes just like you do, the rage loses its grip."In the end, controlling your reactions is not just about being polite. It is about being safe, sane and responsible."

The Justice Department is seeking to indict former FBI Director James Comey, Fox News has learned."DOJ officials are close to deciding whether to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey for allegedly lying to Congress in September 2020," a source said. "There is a grand jury underway looking at the matter in Virginia. A decision could come any day."The extent of the potential charges were unclear.This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

The shooting of three ICE agents in Texas on Wednesday marks the latest and most brazen example of a surge in left-wing political violence.From the dual attempted assassinations of President Donald Trump to the murder of Charlie Kirk, a chilling pattern is unmistakable: the lefts relentless demonization of conservatives is fueling real-world bloodshed.DEADLY DALLAS ICE SHOOTING VICTIMS ARE DETAINEES, SOURCES SAY; SHOOTER DEAD"This latest shooting against ICE shows what happens after decades of lack of consequences," Lora Ries, director of the Border Security and Immigration Center at The Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital.Ries argued that decades of weak immigration enforcement have emboldened activist groups, who are now lashing out against todays tougher measures."We need to apply consequences early and often to crime, particularly violence, and immigration violations," she added.FBI Director Kash Patel said law enforcement officials recovered anti-ICE messaging at the scene. One of the unspent shell casings was engraved with the phrase "ANTI ICE," underscoring investigators belief that the attack was politically motivated."These despicable, politically motivated attacks against law enforcement are not a one-off," Patel wrote on a post in X. "We are only miles from Prarieland, Texas, where just two months ago, an individual ambushed a separate ICE facility targeting their officers," he added.And while the FBI vows accountability, Homeland Security officials point to the deeper problem: rhetoric that has already turned ICE agents into open targets.WHO IS JOSHUA JAHN, SHOOTER IN DEADLY DALLAS ICE FACILITY ATTACK?"We've been saying for months that the rhetoric around our law enforcement, particularly ICE, the dehumanization, the demonization has spun so far out of control and that someone is going to get hurt or someone's going to get killed," Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Fox News."This must stop," McLaughlin added during her interview on "America's Newsroom."Outside government, analysts agree the threat is serious and more recently tied to the lefts rhetoric."There is a serious political problem in the United States," Charles Fain Lehman, a fellow at the Manhattan Institute, told Fox News Digital.He stressed that all political violence is bad, but noted that "the most recent string of incidents has been left-coded," pointing to attacks on Teslas, ICE agents, and a string of politically motivated shootings and bombings.TRUMP OFFICIALS SLAM BLUE STATE GOVERNOR FOR IGNORING CHAOTIC ANTI-ICE RIOTERS DISRUPTING OPERATIONLehman said the murder of Charlie Kirk was the culmination of that trend carried out by a suspect who had previously called the 31-year-old political activist a "fascist," borrowing the same language often used by prominent Democrats to describe conservatives."At a certain point, if you make these arguments about people, somebody, somewhere, will take you seriously enough to use force because you are making an argument that seems to justify the use of force," Lehman added.CHARLIE KIRK'S ASSASSINATION LATEST CASE OF CONSERVATIVES BEING TARGETED FOR MURDERThe dynamic he describes has already played out in stark terms most dramatically in the two recent assassination attempts on Trump.Paul Sracic is an adjunct fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington, D.C. and the former chair of the Department of Politics and International Relations at Youngstown State University. He said demonizing ICE doesnt make the threats go away."The Department of Homeland Security, using Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents thats what ICE stands for is charged with implementing the immigration laws passed by a democratically elected legislature," Sracic said."To label the enforcement of democratically enacted laws fascist, and the agents responsible for enforcing those laws Nazis, is absurd. Its also dangerous."Beyond the rhetoric, Sracic emphasized that lax immigration enforcement carries its own dangers, from terrorism to fentanyl:"We really need our political leaders, media figures, and citizens to model a return to principled disagreement, where policy differences are debated without resorting to apocalyptic hyperbole."

EXCLUSIVE: A French official pushed back on claims by President Donald Trump that recognizing a Palestinian state amounts to handing Hamas a victory, insisting the initiative advanced at the United Nations this week is designed to marginalize the terror group and revive the two-state solution.In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital at the U.N. General Assembly in New York, Pascal Confavereux, spokesperson for Frances Foreign Ministry, rejected suggestions that President Emmanuel Macron was trying to position himself as an "anti-Trump" leader on the global stage.The spokesperson stressed that relations between Trump and Macron remain strong, despite their visible differences at the U.N. "The French president and President Trump have a relationship that dates back to the first Trump administration. They have very intense discussions, and they are working on many, many issues," he said, noting that the two leaders spoke again on Tuesday about a range of topics. "This is not at all against the Trump administration. On the contrary, what is done here will help."MACRON STAKES ANTI-TRUMP GLOBAL ROLE WITH GAZA INITIATIVE AT UN SUMMITHe also linked the U.N. initiative to the broader framework of regional normalization first championed under Trump. "What were the Abraham Accords of the first Trump administration? They gave reassurance to neighboring Arab countries, and in exchange, they established stronger ties with Israel. Here, the logic is totally coherent with what we are doing, so it will help. Should the Trump administration want to go in this direction, it will definitely open the way to a kind of Abraham Two."Confavereux detailed how the package, led jointly by France and Saudi Arabia, combined recognition of Palestinian statehood with a series of commitments: condemnation of the Oct. 7 massacre, exclusion of Hamas from any future Palestinian government, governance reforms by the Palestinian Authority, and planning for reconstruction and regional integration. "All these pieces of the puzzle were put together by this initiative," he said, adding that otherwise "the two-state solution would have been in a very bad place."TRUMP DENOUNCES EUROPEAN RECOGNITION OF PALESTINIAN STATE AS REWARD FOR HAMASTrump, in his own U.N. speech Tuesday, sharply condemned the French-Saudi plan. "Recognizing a Palestinian state today would reward Hamas for its horrible atrocities, including Oct. 7," Trump told world leaders, warning that such recognition would prolong the conflict and embolden terrorists.But the French spokesperson argued the opposite. "What was actually adopted at the United Nations General Assembly earlier this week was to save the two-state solution, which frankly was in mortal danger one year ago," he said. "This is exactly a defeat of Hamas. Hamas doesnt want two states, Hamas wants from the river to the sea. Its exactly against that this initiative was prepared."Pressed to answer critics who argue that Macrons international activism is also an attempt to preserve his legacy while he faces domestic struggles and low support at home, the spokesperson declined to comment.French officials nevertheless took pride in having secured broad support. The July "Declaration of New York" spearheaded by France and Saudi Arabia was formally adopted at the General Assembly this month with backing from 142 states. "It was a long effort, but it shows there is an international majority determined to keep the two-state solution alive," the spokesperson said.CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPOn Monday, Trump used Truth Social to declare that Ukraine, with European support, "is in a position to fight and WIN all of Ukraine back in its original form."Confavereux welcomed the remarks, saying, "We welcome very positively these statements by President Trump. What we can see is that President Putin is not at all wanting peace hes sending bombs and drones in Ukraine, hes violating NATO territory in Poland, Estonia, Romania. On the ground he is in total failure, gaining less than 1% of Ukrainian territory in 1,000 days, and that will not change our determination."

Kate Gosselin revealed to fans this week shes been dating a man for more than a year and shes very happy.Without sharing his identity and adding that hes a little camera shy, the former "Kate Plus 8" star said Monday hes someone shes known for a long time.While answering fan questions on TikTok, Gosselin said the answer to "Are you dating?" is "actually, finally yes."She said shes been dating her mystery man for about 14-15 months, and shes "super, super happy."KATE GOSSELIN SLAMS RUMORS SHE STOLE HER CHILDRENS COLLEGE FUNDS"Its someone Ive known for a really long time, and I am very, very happy," she continued. "He doesnt really want to be on TikToks. Cant blame him, I guess. But you, perhaps, will catch a peep of him going forward."A source told the New York Post that Gosselin has been living with former bodyguard Steve Neild."They have wedding plans, its that serious," the source added.Fox News Digital has reached out for comment.Gosselin was married to Jon Gosselin for 10 years before they divorced in 2009.LIKE WHAT YOURE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSThe former couple share eight children together and starred on the reality series "Jon & Kate Plus 8" from 2007 until 2009. The show was rebranded as "Kate Plus 8" after the couple split.Gosselin revealed last month she works 12-hour shifts these days as a pediatric nurse.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTEROne fan asked her in a TikTok video what happened to all her money.CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP"Honestly? Providing for 8 kids, college funds which I am proud to say covered all of their college and more and LAWYERS," she answered. "Sickening but I was drug into court constantly and that costs A TON. Sad bc my kids could have a lot more saved and I could have a retirement saved if it werent for lawyers. Its OK. Im helping other families and I feel needed and I enjoy helping!"

The White House unveiled a Presidential Walk of Fame outside the West Wing on Wednesday, which showed a portrait of former President Joe Biden replaced with the image of an autopen, a device previously used by the commander-in-chief to sign important orders, including pardons.A video posted on X by the White House shows the portraits of previous presidents.When it pans over to Biden, a portrait with an image of an autopen is shown making his signature.TRUMP RENEWS ATTACKS ON BIDEN AUTOPEN PARDONS, CLAIMS HE NEVER GAVE THE ORDERSAnother image posted by the White House appears to show Trump looking at his portrait.An autopen is a machine that physically holds a pen and follows programming to imitate a persons signature. It can hold various types of pens, from ballpoint to permanent marker, according to descriptions of autopen machines for sale online.Trump has railed against Bidens use of the autopen, claiming the former president didnt know what documents he was signing and that thousands of pardons were void. Many of the claims came as he and other Republicans questioned Bidens mental acuity while in office.BIDENS AUTOPEN GRANTED 'SADISTIC CRIMINAL UNDERCLASS' ENTRY TO US, STEPHEN MILLER SAYS"It was illegally used. He never gave the orders," Trump told reporters earlier this month during a trip to the United Kingdom. "He never told them what to do. And I guess the only one he signed, or one of the few he signed, was the pardon for his son."Biden and Democrats have pushed back on criticism of his autopen use and questions about his cognitive abilities.Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House and Biden's office.Trump teased the autopen images during an interview with The Daily Caller."We'll put up a picture of the autopen," he said.Fox News Digital's Diana Stancy contributed to this report.