• WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    NYT accidentally pre-published wrong verdict for trial of would-be Trump assassin
    Would-be Trump assassin Ryan Routh was declared guilty on Tuesday on all charges, but The New York Times accidentally published the wrong article.In journalism, outlets often pre-write obituaries, election outcomes and potential court verdicts of major cases before they occur, using the basic facts of the story and adding whatever key details are essential on the day of.However, a screenshot indicated that the New York Times accidentally published a headline, "Man Found Not Guilty of Trying to Assassinate Trump in Florida." The lede of the now-scrubbed article added, "In a surprise verdict, a federal jury acquitted Ryan Routh of attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate last year. The screenshot also indicated that the article would be published in the print edition on September 24, 2025.TONY HAWK, TAIWAN AND A FLASHLIGHT: TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT SUSPECTS BIZARRE DEFENSEPodcast host and Fox News contributor Mary Katharine Ham posted the screenshot and wrote, "Just searched Ryan Routh's name @nytimes and got this result in the first head and subhead. I get it y'all have some kind of prewrite, but why is it preloaded? Routh was just convicted on all charges. Let's make sure that's the print edition tomorrow."Raw Story writer Sarah Burris was shocked that this outcome was even considered possible, asking, "In what world does even a pre-writer think he would be not-guilty?"The New York Times quickly updated the article with the new headline, "Man Found Guilty of Trying to Assassinate Trump in Florida." The lede reads, "A federal jury convicted Ryan Routh, an itinerant building contractor, of attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate last September."In a statement to Fox News Digital, a spokesperson for The New York Times said, "Ahead of some newsworthy events like courtroom verdicts, The Times and many other news organizations make preparations for different possible outcomes. An earlier version of this article was published inadvertently with a pre-written version of a not guilty verdict; it was replaced with the correct version less than a minute later, and a correction was added to explain what happened. As the current version makes clear, Mr. Routh was found guilty on all five counts against him."PROSECUTORS TO WRAP TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT CASE AS DEFENSE READIES WITNESSESIn the interest of being current, there have been numerous high-profile cases where outlets got the outcome of major stories wrong. In 1948, the Chicago Daily Tribune famously ran the incorrect front-page headline "Dewey Defeats Truman.""South Park," known for remaining on top of current political and pop culture happeningssometimes completing shows just hours before they airhad to scrap a prewritten episode and write a new one after Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in 2016.Routh was accused of an attempted assassination on President Donald Trump at his West Palm Beach golf club in September 2024. Routh faced five federal counts, including attempting to assassinate a major presidential candidate, assaulting a federal officer, and multiple firearms offenses. The charges carry a maximum sentence of life in prison. CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTUREAfter the verdict was read, Routh reportedly tried to stab himself in the neck with a pen before four U.S. Marshals restrained him.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 36 Views 0 Reviews
  • WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    Guardians' David Fry hit in face by 99 mph fastball during bunt attempt, Tigers' Tarik Skubal left shocked
    A scary scene unfolded at Progressive Field during the Cleveland Guardians-Detroit Tigers game Tuesday night, when the Guardians David Fry was hit in the face by a foul tip on a bunt attempt.In the bottom of the sixth inning with the Guardians down 2-1, there were runners on the corners with no outs when Tarik Skubal delivered a 2-1 pitch to Fry, who quickly turned to square for a sacrifice bunt.But the 99 mph fastball from Skubal, the Tigers' Ace, was too far inside. As Fry made contact with the pitch, it hit the top of his bat and redirected into his face.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COMFry hit the dirt at home plate in immediate pain, and Skubal threw down his glove and hat in shock. Skubal was in clear discomfort after what unfolded, but everyone on the field and in the stands shared his feelings as trainers rushed out to tend to Fry.Fry eventually stood up, and blood was streaming down from his nose. A cart came out to take Fry off the field, and as youd expect, his night was over.ASTROS PITCHER FRAMBER VALDEZ ACCUSED OF INTENTIONALLY HITTING OWN CATCHER AFTER GIVING UP GRAND SLAMUnfortunately for Fry and the Guardians, because the ball made contact with the bat before hitting him in the face, it was considered a foul ball, and the count went to 2-2.Pinch hitter George Valera came in for Fry to finish the at-bat and take his place for the remainder of the game.The inning ended up getting worse for Skubal and the Tigers once play finally resumed. His first pitch after the accident was wild, allowing the runner at third base to score to tie the game, while Jose Ramirez moved up to second.Then Skubal committed a balk, allowing Ramirez a free bag, a groundout to first base scored Ramirez to give Cleveland a 3-2 lead heading into the seventh inning.Skubal is one of the best pitchers in MLB, and the 2024 Cy Young Award winner entered the game with an American League-leading 2.23 ERA over 189.1 innings. His resume this season makes him a frontrunner for the award yet again.The game has huge playoff implications because the Guardians were just one game behind the Tigers when they began their final three-game, regular-season series Tuesday night. Each game is crucial at this point, with only a handful of games remaining to determine who will vie for a World Series title this October.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X, and subscribe tothe Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 52 Views 0 Reviews
  • WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    Kamala Harris disparages Washington Post, LA Times over non-endorsements in 2024
    Former Vice President Kamala Harris called out The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times in her new book, "107 Days," over their refusal to endorse a presidential candidate in 2024."The Los Angeles Times, my hometown newspaper, published its electoral endorsements," she wrote, recalling the Oct. 14 piece published by the paper. "The very first line of the article stated: Its no exaggeration to say this may be the most consequential election in a generation. But there was no mention of the most consequential race of all."The LA Times, owned by Patrick Soon-Shiong, declined to endorse a presidential candidate, and The Washington Post, owned by Jeff Bezos, followed suit."The pre-capitulation of these powerful billionaires alarmed and dispirited me. As it turned out, they were early adopters of the feckless posture that would be embraced by a raft of business leaders and institutions once Trump was elected. Theyd just been the first in line to grovel," Harris wrote after noting the Post's non-endorsement and in reference to President Donald Trump's eventual election victory.WASHINGTON POST UNION, STAFFERS REVOLT OVER DECISION NOT TO ENDORSE A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, BLAME BEZOSHarris's new book was released on Tuesday and recounts her historically short presidential campaign that followed former President Joe Biden's decision to exit the race.The LA Times announced in late October the editorial board wouldnt be endorsing a candidate for the first time since 2008. As a result, the papers editorials editor, Mariel Garza, resigned over what she alleges was the owner's decision not to endorse Harris.The LA Times told Fox News Digital "an endorsement by the Los Angeles Times is an important decision that can influence a large number of voters. After thoughtful consideration, the owner, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, could not endorse Vice President Harris, based on the record of the Biden administration and her own track record. Competence matters!"The Post announced days later that the editorial board would not be endorsing a presidential candidate in the 2024 election or any future presidential election.William Lewis, publisher and CEO of The Washington Post, called the decision at the time "a statement in support of our readers ability to make up their own minds on this, the most consequential of American decisions whom to vote for as the next president."BEFORE NON-ENDORSEMENT DECISION, WASHINGTON POST CALLED TRUMP 'DREADFUL' AND 'WORST PRESIDENT OF MODERN TIMES'The paper has only endorsed Democratic presidential candidates, except in 1988 when it declined to endorse Democrat Michael Dukakis.The Washington Post did not immediately return a request for comment.USA Today and The Minnesota Star Tribune also declined to endorse a presidential candidate in the 2024 election.Harris quoted former Washington Post editor Marty Baron's reaction to the paper's non-endorsement in her book, writing, "This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty. Donald Trump will celebrate this as an invitation to further intimidate The Posts owner, Jeff Bezos (and other media owners). History will mark a disturbing chapter of spinelessness at an institution famed for courage."CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTUREHarris also highlighted Alexandra Petri, who now writes for The Atlantic but previously served as a political humor columnist at the Post."But if I were the paper, I would be a little embarrassed that it has fallen to me, the humor columnist, to make our presidential endorsement. I will spare you the suspense: I am endorsing Kamala Harris for president, because I like elections and want to keep having them," Petri wrote at the time.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 52 Views 0 Reviews
  • WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    Democrat succeeds her late father in Congress as GOP House majority shrinks
    Democrat Adelita Grijalva has won a special election in battleground Arizona, securing the congressional seat left vacant by her fathers death and further eroding Republicans razor-thin House majority.The Associated Press reports that Grijalva, a former Pima County supervisor, defeated business owner and contractor Daniel Butierez, the Republican nominee, in Tuesday's election in southern Arizona's 7th Congressional District.Grijalva will serve the remaining 15 months of the term of Raul Grijalva, who died in March following complications from cancer treatment.TRUMP NOT ON BALLOT BUT FRONT-AND-CENTER IN 2025 ELECTIONSThe younger Grijalva's victory was anything but a surprise in the left-leaning district. Democrats enjoy a nearly two-to-one voter registration advantage over Republicans in the Hispanic-majority district, which stretches from Yuma to Tucson and includes almost the entire length of the state's border with Mexico.HEAD HERE FOR FOX NEWS' 2025 ELECTION COVERAGERepublicans currently control the House 219-214, with two vacant seats remaining.Besides Arizona's 7th Congressional District, there's also a vacancy in Texas 18th Congressional District, a heavily Democrat-dominated district in Houston, following the March death of Democratic Rep. Sylvester Turner. The special election to fill the seat will be held on November 4, which is Election Day 2025.Tennessee's 7th Congressional District, a right-leaning seat where Republican Rep. Mark Green stepped down in July to take a job in the private sector, is also currently vacant. The special election to fill the seat will be held on December 2.Grijalva, thanks in part to her family name and her support from national progressive rock stars, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, grabbed over 60% of the primary vote this summer in a five-candidate showdown.Progressive activist and social media influencer Deja Foxx came in a distant second.Grijalva, who with her victory became Arizona's first Latina in Congress, targeted President Donald Trump as she campaigned,"In Congress, I commit to fight Trumps cruel agenda, like the Big Ugly Bill that took away coverage from nearly 383,000 Arizonans and 142,000 children," Grijalva pledged in a social media post, as she took aim at Trump, congressional Republicans, and their sweeping domestic policy measure that they named the One Big Beautiful Bill.Grijalva had also said that if she won, she would immediately sign a discharge petition by Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California and Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky. The petition, which is currently just one vote shy of passing, calls on the GOP-controlled House to vote to urge the Justice Department to release the files on the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.Butierez, as he campaigned, had been promoting himself as the change candidate in a district controlled by Democrats since the seat was created over two decades ago."This is your chance to actually get a Representative who will represent everyone. If you vote we win, if you don't only the radicals will have representation," he wrote on X.Butierez, who as the 2024 GOP congressional nominee lost to the elder Grijalva while Trump narrowly carried the southwestern battleground state at the top of the ballot, easily won this summer's Republican primary in the special election.While Trump carried Arizona last year after losing it in 2020, 2024 Democratic presidential nominee and then-Vice President Kamala Harris won the district by 23 points.Democratic National Committee chair Ken Martin, in a statement after the race was called, said that "Rep.-elect Grijalva won a hard-fought race. Now, Arizonans will have a fighter in their corner who will stand up to Trump on behalf of families who want to see real leadership in Washington."
    0 Comments 0 Shares 47 Views 0 Reviews
  • WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    Jimmy Kimmel chokes up as he explains Kirk comments, says he 'never' intended to mock assassination
    "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" host Jimmy Kimmel insisted that he never intended to make light of Charlie Kirk's assassination in comments that led to his show's suspension.Tuesday night was the first show Kimmel hosted since Disney announced its return on Monday after nearly a week off the air.Kimmel came out to a standing ovation which continued into chants of "Jimmy! Jimmy! Jimmy!" and ongoing cheering."If you are just joining us, we are preempting your regularly scheduled encore episode of 'Celebrity Family Feud,' were bringing you this special report," Kimmel opened. "Im happy to be here with you tonight."WHY ABC BRINGS BACK JIMMY KIMMEL TODAY AFTER ITS DEBACLE OVER FREE SPEECHHe went on to thank his fellow late-night talk show hosts, including Stephen Colbert, Jon Stewart and David Letterman, along with right-leaning critics like Clay Travis and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, for showing some support for him during his suspension.Kimmel then addressed, though did not apologize for, the comments that originally got him suspended."Ive been hearing a lot about what I need to say and do tonight, and the truth is, I dont think what I have to say is going to make much of a difference," Kimmel said. "If you like me, you like me. If you dont, you dont. I have no illusions about changing anyones mind. But I want to make something clear, because its important to me as a human, and that is you understand that it was never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man."Kimmel began tearing up as he said he posted a message to Instagram sending love to Kirk's family the day of his death."Nor was it my intention to blame any specific group for the actions," he continued. "It was a deeply disturbed individual. That was really the opposite of the point I was trying to make, but I understand that, to some, it felt either ill-timed or unclear or maybe both, and for those who think I did point a finger, I get why youre upset. If the situation was reversed, theres a good chance I would have felt the same way."Kimmel added, "I have many friends and family members on the other side who I love and remain close to, even though we dont agree on politics at all. I dont think the murderer who shot Charlie Kirk represents anyone. This was a sick person who believed violence was a solution, and it isnt ever."LIBERALS RAGE AS ABC PULLS JIMMY KIMMEL OFF AIR FOLLOWING CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSIN COMMENTSKimmel also gave his mixed thoughts on Disney suspending his show after 23 years on the air."Every night, they defended my right to poke fun at our leaders and to advocate for subjects that I think are important by allowing me to use their platform, and I'm very grateful for that. With that said, I was not happy when they pulled me off the air on Wednesday," Kimmel said.He added, "I did not agree with that decision and I told them that, and we had many conversations. I shared my point of view, they shared theirs. We talked it through. And at the end, even though they didnt have to, they really didnt have to, this is a giant company, we have short attention spans, and I am a tiny part of the Disney corporation, they welcomed me back on the air."Kimmel closed his monologue by tearfully recounting Erica Kirk's speech at her husband's funeral where she showed forgiveness to his assassin."There was a moment over the weekend, a very beautiful moment. I dont know if you saw this. On Sunday, Erika Kirk forgave the man who shot her husband. She forgave him. That is an example we should follow. If you believe in the teachings of Jesus, as I do, there it was. Thats it. A selfless act of grace, forgiveness from a grieving widow. It touched me deeply, and I hope it touches many, and if theres anything we should take from this tragedy to carry forward, I hope it can be that," Kimmel said.Kimmels show was suspended by Disney last Wednesday after he said right-wing commentators were "desperately" trying to characterize Kirks alleged assassin as someone who wasnt "MAGA.""We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it," Kimmel said on Sept. 15.Broadcasting companies Sinclair Broadcasting Group and Nexstar Media Group announced after the episode aired that they would be preempting the show across dozens of ABC affiliates because of Kimmels "ill-timed and insensitive" comments.CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTUREFederal Communications Commission (FCC) chair Brendan Carr also made a veiled threat against the show following backlash from the comments.Sinclair and Nexstar preempted Kimmels show again Tuesday night and have said they will keep doing so as discussions with ABC continue behind the scenes.Ahead of Kimmel's return, President Donald Trump attacked both Kimmel and ABC for bringing the show back despite being told that it was "canceled."CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP"I cant believe ABC Fake News gave Jimmy Kimmel his job back. The White House was told by ABC that his Show was cancelled! Something happened between then and now because his audience is GONE, and his talent was never there. Why would they want someone back who does so poorly, whos not funny, and who puts the Network in jeopardy by playing 99% positive Democrat GARBAGE," Trump wrote.He continued, "He is yet another arm of the DNC and, to the best of my knowledge, that would be a major Illegal Campaign Contribution. I think were going to test ABC out on this. Lets see how we do. Last time I went after them, they gave me $16 Million Dollars. This one sounds even more lucrative. A true bunch of losers! Let Jimmy Kimmel rot in his bad Ratings."
    0 Comments 0 Shares 28 Views 0 Reviews
AtoZ Buzz! Take Control of the narrative https://atozbuzz.com