Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey announced the closure of all remaining hotel shelters in the Bay State amid the formal termination of her executive emergency focused on the states Biden-era migrant influx.Meanwhile, Mike Kennealy -- her Republican rival in the 2026 gubernatorial sweeps who also served as the states housing secretary under GOP Gov. Charlie Baker -- is telling the Democrat, "I told you so."Healey described her emergency order period as a success, saying that when she took over from Baker, "families were being placed in hotels all across the state, and families were staying in shelter for months sometimes years at a time.""There was no plan in place to reform the shelter system to handle the surge in demand, protect taxpayer dollars or help families leave shelter. We can all agree that a hotel is no place to raise a family. So, we took action," Healey said, as the state employed hotels, community centers and even a defunct prison to house the influx.IT'LL UPEND THE COMMUNITY: PA TOWN ROILED BY TALK OF MIGRANT HOUSING IN CIVIL-WAR ERA ORPHANAGEIn 1983, then-Gov. Michael Dukakis signed what remains the nations only statewide right-to-shelter law, which set in motion the conditions for such a migrant housing crisis.Healey and the Democratic-majority legislature in Boston revised Dukakis law to a six-month limit on that right, and to require proof of residency as well as proper immigration paperwork with some exceptions.Kennealy said he warned Healey about a "potential, looming migrant crisis I warned her in writing.""She didnt listen," he posted Tuesday, accusing Healey of "playing politics" with the Biden-era migrant crisis and "selling false hope" to migrants and taxpayers.MASSACHUSETTS RESIDENT CONDEMNS RIGHT-TO-SHELTER LAW TURNING BAY STATE INTO DESTINATION FOR MIGRANTS"The hotels may be closed for now, but the crisis lives on through the HomeBASE program and runaway spending," Kennealy said, adding that if elected he will "audit and fix it."Kennealys comments came weeks after a report showed Bay Staters will spend as much as $1 billion cumulatively on the states emergency shelter program in FY-2025, with migrant families making up a significant share of those receiving assistance.The costs work out at about $3,496 per week per family, or around $1,000 per person per week for the program, known as the Emergency Assistance system, according to the states Executive Office for Housing and Livable Communities.A Healey spokesperson told the Boston Herald on Monday that the governor "inherited a disaster of a shelter system" from Kennealy, whom she said offered scant substantive advice.CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP"Gov. Healey is the one who took action to implement a length of stay limit, mandate criminal background checks, require residents to prove Massachusetts residency and lawful immigration status, and get families out of hotels," Karissa Hand told the paper.A Kennealy spokesperson told the paper the now-candidate had warned both Healey and Lt. Gov. Kim Driscoll of the impending crisis in-person.Fox News Digitals Michael Dorgan contributed to this report.

Obesity-related cancer deaths have soared in the U.S. over the last two decades, rising from 3.73 million to 13.52 million.That's according to a study by researchers at Jersey Shore University Medical Center and Hackensack Meridian Health, which was presented last month at ENDO 2025, the Endocrine Societys annual meeting in San Francisco.The study analyzed more than 33,000 deaths from obesity-associated cancers between 1999 and 2020, using mortality data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).POPULAR WEIGHT-LOSS MEDICATION COULD RELIEVE PAINFUL ARTHRITIS SYMPTOMS, DOCTORS REPORTOlder adults, females and racial minorities were found to have a higher burden of risk.Overall, the Midwest had the highest rate of obesity-related cancer deaths and the Northeast had the lowest.Vermont, Minnesota and Oklahoma had the highest rates, and Utah, Alabama and Virginia had the lowest.According to the CDC, more than 40% of Americans have obesity, which raises the risk of developing certain cancers as well as other chronic conditions like high blood pressure, high cholesterol, diabetes, heart disease and kidney disease.Obesity has been associated with a higher risk of developing 13 types of cancer, which make up 40% of all cancers diagnosed in the U.S. every year.WEIGHT-LOSS DRUGS IMPACT ON CANCER RISK REVEALED IN NEW STUDYThese cancer types include the following.Study co-author Mohamed Bakr, M.D., associate director of Hackensack Meridian Jersey Shore University Medical Centers Residency Program, confirmed that obesity-related cancer mortality has more than tripled in the U.S.The sharpest surge occurred between 2018 and 2020, according to Bakr."This research underscores the need for targeted public health strategies, such as early screening and improved access to care, especially in high-risk rural and underserved areas," he told Fox News Digital.YOUR DNA COULD BE STOPPING YOU FROM LOSING WEIGHT, NEW STUDY SUGGESTS"Obesity is a serious public health threat, and the link between obesity and cancer is a crisis that should be addressed with the same urgency as other epidemics."Dr. Robert Den, radiation oncologist and chief medical officer at Alpha Tau Medical in Massachusetts, told Fox News Digital that there is a "concerning rise" in these cancers, particularly colorectal, endometrial, pancreatic and postmenopausal breast cancer."Alarmingly, these cancers are increasing not only in older adults, but also in younger patients a trend we didnt see a generation ago," said Den, who was not involved in the study."These cancers tend to be more aggressive, harder to treat and costly to manage," he added. "The sheer number of people at risk, combined with the rising obesity rates, means were looking at increased cancer burdens on individuals, families and healthcare systems."Promoting healthy body weight through a balanced diet, regular physical activity and less alcohol consumption are important steps toward reducing cancer risk, according to Den, as well as cancer screenings and early intervention."As physicians, we advocate for broader public health efforts like better nutrition education, access to healthier foods and environments that support active living," he said. "Additionally, new technologies and therapies represent a novel paradigm for the management of these diseases.""Preventing obesity is cancer prevention, and taking proactive steps now can improve long-term health outcomes across the population," he added.Sue Decotiis, M.D., a medical weight-loss doctor in New York City, noted in a separate interview with Fox News Digital that the use of obesity and diabetes drugs, like GLP-1 medications, has been associated with reducing cancer risk."It is one of the most impactful medical advancements we have had in a very long time," she said.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTERAccording to the doctor, "angry, inflamed fat cells," called cytokines, are produced in large amounts in obese individuals, which can "bully and override" the bodys normal regulations, often leading to immune disruption and cancer.In addition to early cancer screenings, Decotiis recommends weight loss as a critical way to reduce risk.Shedding extra pounds can help reduce inflammation in the body by reducing cytokines, which also prevents cancers, she said.For more Health articles, visitwww.foxnews.com/health"It seems more prudent to aggressively treat obesity and insulin resistance, as well as clean up our food supply, instead of waiting for cancer to develop and hoping we can catch it and successfully treat it," she said."Take the state of being overweight and obese seriously," Decotiis advised. "If weight is not reduced by diet and exercise, I recommend seeing a certified weight-loss physician."

Budweiser just wrapped up its quarterly earnings call and the good news is there's plenty of alcohol at their St. Louis headquarters. The bad news is they're going to need it after the stock price of their parent company, Anheuser-Busch, fell by 11.57%. Now, I'm no financial analyst, but I do look like a guy who gets paid in six packs, so I feel a unique obligation to offer the King of Beers this foolproof plan to get back on the throne:Hire Sydney Sweeney to be your next pitchperson immediately because she's everything your brand needs to get back on its feet. Trust me, I'm kind of an expert at watching people struggle to get back up because I spent the last four years covering Joe Biden.For starters, Sydney Sweeney is the hottest name in advertising after her American Eagle campaign sent that company's stock soaring by 23% on Monday. President Trump even gave her a shoutout on Truth Social and claimed she's a hotter brand than Taylor Swift. It's unclear if that's true, but Taylor is definitely losing street cred every time her boyfriend, Travis Kelce, shows off that terrible new haircut of his. Speaking of alcohol consumption, I hope somebody took away the barber's car keys.AMERICAN EAGLE STOCK JUMPS FOLLOWING TRUMP PRAISE FOR SYDNEY SWEENEY ADBut all jokes aside, what Sydney Sweeney really represents to Bud Light is a 'pitcher' perfect way to win back all the folks they lost with the disastrous decision to team up with trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney.Think about it. Bud Light spent decades using funny commercials full of hot women to build the number one domestic beer brand, only to become a national punchline when it gave Mulvaney a commemorative can to celebrate "one year of womanhood."It's worth pointing out that, technically speaking, they were giving beer to a one-year-old girl! I'm not sure that's what their commercials mean by "drink responsibly" but it definitely wasn't a safe way to advertise because the marketing team gambled on alienating the base and wound up losing everything, including their jobs.That being said, if Bud Light teams up with Sydney Sweeney, all the ill will from the Dylan Mulvaney fiasco will disappear faster than a CEO on a Coldplay Kiss Cam.SYDNEY SWEENEY 'JEANS' AD SIGNALS MAJOR CULTURAL TURNING POINT, INDUSTRY EXPERTS SAYI say that because as a gorgeous and fun loving girl who is not ashamed of her femininity, she's everything that made Bud Light Commercials successful before the Mad Men in the advertising department were replaced with Mad THEM.Teaming up with Sweeney would mark a return to the Golden Age of beer sales, where catering to the customer's preferences was far more important than trying to align them with the woke White chicks screaming into their iPHONES on TIK TOK.Take it from me, Bud Light. Blue-haired women with nose piercings are not your target demo, unless you're going to start selling milk for their cats.Making beer sales great again is the goal here.BROADCAST BIAS: ABC COMPARES SYDNEY SWEENEY AD TO NAZIS AS NETWORKS GO NUTS ABOUT HER GENESYou do that by handing a win to the same guys who felt alienated when you poured identity politics down their throat and touched off the Mulvaney Meltdown in March of 2023.There is NOTHING young men would enjoy more than aligning with a brand that gives that same middle finger to the woke left and their allies in the outrage mob.Bud Light is in a safe position to buy them this round because the country has wholly rejected the absurd accusation that joking about "good genes" is somehow a NAZI outreach campaign.Which explains why American Eagle issued a statement refusing to back down and other companies have leaned into the return of "hotness in advertising." Dunkin is running its own good genes commercial and Arby's has enlisted WNBA star Sophie Cunningham for their "Hot Chicks Eat Arby's" campaign.Rumor has it they wanted to use Caitlin Clark but she kept getting fouled during the shooting.HOW 'GENETICS' ADS FROM AMERICAN EAGLE AND DUNKIN TRIGGERED A CULTURAL FIRESTORMIn short, the market has spoken and said that anyone who can't distinguish between hot chicks and Hitler is intellectually disqualified from any position of societal influence whatsoever.Which is why I implore you, Bud Light, to appeal to the Real Men of Genius in your ranks once more, and go all in on Sydney Sweeney.Don't get me wrong, I hate the idea of urging a beer brand to jump into a culture war, but I didn't make these rules. Bud Light, you did.I can't stand the fact that everything's so political these days and it's often hard to wrap my head around just how insane the era of identity politics has gotten.CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINIONWhen I was a kid my white parents yelled at me for having too much ice cream.Now my Ben n Jerry's yells at me for having White parents.It makes no sense but neither does letting the number one beer brand keep on sinking because it's out of touch with the people who propelled it to greatness.So my advice for Bud Light is to scroll over to Sydney Sweeney's Instagram account and give her a follow like 25.3 million other Americans have done.As for the rest of you, buckle up.If you think the outrage mob was mad when Sydney made double entendres about her "good genes" wait until Bud Light is making jokes about her "nice cans."Don't worry, you can say this stuff again because if the past week has taught us anything it's that Cancel Culture is dead.And we can all drink to that.CLICK HERE FOR MORE FROM JIMMY FAILLA

Former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is preparing for a new role.The longtime Hollywood action star who was the last Republican elected governor in Democrat-dominated California is gearing up to oppose the push by current Gov. Gavin Newsom to scrap the state's non-partisan redistricting commission."He calls gerrymandering evil, and he means that. He thinks its truly evil for politicians to take power from people," Schwarzenegger spokesperson Daniel Ketchell told Politico.Newsom, whom pundits view as a likely contender for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, aims to redraw California's congressional maps, to give the state five more blue-leaning House districts ahead of next year's midterm elections.The push by Newsom is a counter effort to negate a move underway by Republicans in GOP-dominated Texas to create five more right-leaning congressional districts at President Donald Trump's urging.NEWSOM VOWS TO FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE IN CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING BATTLEThe Republican push in Texas is part of a broader effort by the GOP across the country to keep control of their razor-thin House majority, and cushion losses elsewhere in the country, as the party in power traditionally faces political headwinds and loses seats in midterm elections.Trump and his political team are aiming to prevent what happened during his first term in the White House, when Democrats stormed back to grab the House majority in the 2018 midterms.AWOL TEXAS DEMS THREATENED WITH EXPULSION, FELONY CHARGES FOR ABSENCE AMID REDISTRICTING BATTLE"Texas will be the biggest one," the president told reporters recently, as he predicted the number of GOP-friendly seats that could be added through redistricting in the reliably red state. "Just a simple redrawing, we pick up five seats."Scores of Texas Democrats in the state legislature fled the state, to prevent Republicans from holding votes to pass the new maps. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott has called for those lawmakers to be arrested and prosecuted upon their return to the Lone Star State.The moves by Republicans and Democrats to implement rare mid-decade redistricting is opposed by Schwarzenegger, who championed California's nonpartisan redistricting system."Hes opposed to what Texas is doing, and hes opposed to the idea that California would race to the bottom to do the same thing," Ketchell added.HOCHUL VOWS TO 'FIGHT FIRE WITH FIRE' ON REDISTRICTING WHILE HOSTING TEXAS DEMOCRATS WHO FLED STATESchwarzenegger, during his tenure as governor, had a starring role in the passage of constitutional amendments in California in 2008 and 2010 that took the power to draw state legislative and congressional districts away from politicians and place it in the hands of an independent commission.While the Republican push in Texas to upend the current congressional maps doesn't face constitutional constraints, Newsom's path in California is much more complicated.The governor is moving to hold a special election this year, to obtain voter approval to undo the constitutional amendments that created the non-partisan redistricting commission. A two-thirds majority vote in the Democrat-dominated California legislature would be needed to hold the referendum."The proposal that we're advancing with the legislature has a trigger only if they move forward, to dismantling the protocols that are well-established," Newsom said on Monday. "Would the state of California move forward in kind? Fighting? Yes, fire with fire."Newsom said the people of California would have the final say."We will offer them the opportunity to make judgments for themselves, again, only if Texas moves forward," Newsom said.

President Donald Trump recently broke with decades of strategic silence when he publicly revealed the repositioning of U.S. nuclear-powered submarines in a thinly veiled warning to Russia.The announcement targeted at Russian Security Council Deputy Chairman and former President Dmitry Medvedev after his latest nuclear threats sent shockwaves through the defense world not just for its provocation, but for the sheer fact that it was said out loud.Presidents have long moved military assets like aircraft carriers and bombers to signal resolve. But submarines, especially the covert, nuclear-powered kind, are rarely mentioned."We rarely, if ever, talk about submarine movements unless theres been an undeniable accident," Gene Moran, a former Navy captain and Pentagon strategic advisor, told Fox News Digital.Plenty of other military assets Patriot batteries, aircraft carriers, even B-52 bombers are deployed publicly to send a diplomatic message. But this time, the secretive nature of the nuclear submarine positioning may have been the reason for the choice."Submarine deployments are unverifiable," said Moran. "Thats what gives them strategic value, but also what makes this announcement clever if you're aiming for a headline."TRUMP CONFIRMS 2 NUCLEAR SUBMARINES ARE 'IN THE REGION' TO COUNTER RUSSIAVice Admiral Mike Connor, former commander of U.S. submarine forces, said Trumps statement may have sounded bold, but was in fact consistent with long-standing doctrine."He didnt really give away too much," Connor, who now serves as CEO of maritime tech company ThayerMahan, told Fox News Digital. "Its generally understood, by our potential adversaries, that our submarines are out there, have been out there for 60-plus years, and are able to strike pretty much where they want, when they want, if needed.""Its a more gentle message done this way," Connor added. "Its not really in your face. Its just a reminder of what already exists."The president was vague in revealing his plans, only announcing that nuclear submarines would be positioned in the "appropriate regions" following Medvedevs accusations that he was escalating the war. Trump told reporters Sunday the submarines are "already in the region, where they should be."Moran said Trump may have simply aligned a routine rotation with a strategic message."It doesnt cost anything," he said. "But if you do it repeatedly, it begins to reveal where your thresholds are. That has long-term consequences."He also cast doubt on the depth of coordination behind the announcement, saying "Submarines dont just move at the snap of a finger."Matthew Shoemaker, a former defense intelligence official, echoed that point."Its certainly unusual to announce it from an operational perspective," he said, "which means this is primarily about sending a message to the Russians rather than trying to achieve a military goal."TRUMP REPOSITIONS 2 NUCLEAR SUBMARINES AFTER 'HIGHLY PROVOCATIVE' RUSSIAN COMMENTSMeanwhile, Trump's frustration with Putin has grown in recent weeks amid stalled negotiations to end the war, prompting him to scale back the deadline for Russia to agree to a peace deal.Trump's disclosure of the submarine presence puts additional pressure on Russia to come to the negotiating table, according to Bryan Clark, a retired submarine officer and director of the Hudson Institute think tanks Center for Defense Concepts and Technology."We have used very sparingly submarines to try to influence adversary behavior before, but this is pretty unusual, to do it against a nuclear-powered adversary like Russia in response to a nuclear threat by Russia," Clark told Fox News Digital Monday. "So I think this is trying to essentially push back on Russia's frequent and long-standing threats to use nuclear weapons in part of the Ukraine conflict."Mark Cancian, senior adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, believes its more likely that two already-deployed U.S. submarines were repositioned rather than any new vessels dispatched."At any one time there are about a dozen U.S. submarines deployed," he said. "We probably just moved two of them to different spots. There hasnt been any report of new submarine sailings youd have heard about that."Retired Navy Capt. Todd Sawhill, who served as a targeting expert with the Joint Staff and U.S. Central Command, said theres precedent for moving submarines in response to tensions but rarely is it spoken of this openly."It is atypical to have a sitting president telegraph it so plainly," Sawhill said. "Its consistent with Trumps desire to direct-message, so in that sense its not surprising. But its not how these things are usually done."Experts agree that once a U.S. submarine leaves port, it becomes difficult though not impossible for adversaries to track."These are very tightly controlled pieces of information," Cancian said. "The U.S. has good confidence that deployed submarines arent being followed though weve been wrong before."Shoemaker noted that geography plays a significant role. "The closer one gets to an adversarys shores, the more likely they can find and track our subs," he said. "So it depends on where exactly these subs are sent near Russia."Moran added that both sides exaggerate their tracking capabilities."Its easy to claim you know where your adversary is," he said. "But with modern submarines, thats a very difficult task."Connor also pointed to a recent case that underscored the low-profile potency of submarines."A few weeks ago, there was a strike on Iranian nuclear weapon component manufacturing sites," he said. "There was a lot of noise about the fact that some Air Force planes flew from the U.S. and struck two deeply buried targets. And it was more or less a side note that a submarine who knows which one or where it was struck 30 targets at the same time.""Its a capability thats always there, not often used and doesnt need to be talked about too overtly to be effective."But unlike the Iran strikes, it appears improbable that the submarines dispatched in response to increased tension with Russia would see the same kind of action, according to Clark.That's because the U.S. hasn't directly intervened militarily to back Ukraine, and the locations where these submarines operate are not best suited to launch attacks against Russian adversaries, since the cruise missiles would go over NATO countries like Romania, Clark said."It's unlikely to be a cruise missile attack that we threaten or even conduct," Clark said. "I think it's much more likely that we will be using attack submarines to sort of convey to the Russians that we can hold important targets of their own at risk if they do decide to escalate."Asked whether Russia might respond with its own maneuvers, Shoemaker was unequivocal: "Yes, almost certainly. Russia routinely and historically likes to do comparable responses to American actions."Moran pointed to a recent example from 2024: "Russia moved ships near Cuba, and we responded by surfacing a submarine in Guantanamo Bay. Thats a case of operational schedules aligning with an opportunity to send a message."But such cat-and-mouse signaling carries risk."Missteps can be made. Things can be misinterpreted," Moran warned. "Weve been here before."Connor agreed that the oceans will remain a chessboard of silent signaling."Both countries have the freedom to operate as they would like in international waters," he said. "Theyve done that for decades and will likely continue to do so."The move appears to be part deterrence, part diplomacy.Trump "is showing annoyance with Russias unwillingness to negotiate seriously on Ukraine," said Cancian. "But more significantly, hes pushing back on Russias nuclear saber-rattling a pattern thats existed since the beginning of the war."

A 23-year-old is facing charges of disorderly conduct, public indecency/indecent exposure, and criminal trespass after allegedly throwing a neon-green sex toy onto a court during a recent WNBA game.Delbert Carver was booked into Clayton County jail in Georgia on Saturday, about 15 miles away from where another sex-toy-throwing incident occurred last Tuesday.Carver's case, according to information online, is currently "pending." He was released from jail late Sunday on bond.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COMAccording to ESPN, the police affidavit stated that Carver allegedly told police the incident was "a joke" that was "supposed to go viral" and it certainly has. Carver was allegedly at the game with friends.The WNBA announced on Saturday that one of the culprits had been arrested, and there would be further punishments for whoever threw an object onto the playing surface."The safety and well-being of everyone in our arenas is a top priority for our league. Objects of any kind thrown onto the court or in the seating area can pose a safety risk for players, game officials, and fans," the league said in a statement. "In line with WNBA Arena Security Standards, any fan who intentionally throws an object onto the court will be immediately ejected and face a minimum one-year ban in addition to being subject to arrest and prosecution by local authorities."SOPHIE CUNNINGHAM OPENS UP ON EX-TEAM'S TREATMENT OF CAITLIN CLARK, AND INFAMOUS FIGHT THAT CHIPPED HER TOOTHIn an odd coincidence, both incidents occurred during the Golden State Valkyries' road games the second was on Friday night against the Chicago Sky.Indiana Fever star Sophie Cunningham issued a PSA after the second moment went viral on social media."Stop throwing dildos on the court youre going to hurt one of us," she wrote on X.Angel Reese jokingly blamed one of Cunningham's and Caitlin Clark's teammates, Sydney Colson, for the incidents."hey [Sydney Colson] why do you keep throwing your mean green in different arenas. its getting weird," Reese posted on X late Friday night.Colson replied with a photo of herself smirking while wearing a green jacket.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X,and subscribe tothe Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Police in Jackson, Tennessee, arrested quadruple murder suspect Austin Drummond on Tuesday morning following a lockdown alert for local residents.The Jackson Police Department announced officers took Drummond into custody after warning residents in two areas of the city to shelter in place. Police earlier released surveillance video of Drummond approaching a local church while armed with a rifle.Police said a "confirmed" sighting of Drummond happened along the 700 block of Pipkin Road in Jackson on Sunday night and that he should be "considered armed and dangerous." Jackson Police Department Public Information Officer Stephanie Graham told Fox News Digital the sightings which were captured on surveillance video were at a local church.QUADRUPLE MURDER SUSPECT AUSTIN DRUMMONDS LAVISH LIFE BEHIND BARS INCLUDED ALCOHOL, TV STREAMINGThe area Drummond was spotted in is about four miles from where investigators found an abandoned vehicle believed to have been driven by him late last week.In one of two videos released by police, Drummond appeared to be trying to open a door to get inside of a building around 11 p.m. Sunday.A reward for information leading to his capture has now surged to $32,500, with the U.S. Marshals Service Two Rivers Violent Fugitive Task Force assisting in the manhunt."Our priority is finding Austin Drummond and helping deliver justice for the victims families. The combined effort of agencies from every level including the Office of Governor Bill Lee is evidence of our commitment to preserving peace and ensuring the safety of our communities," U.S. Marshal Tyreece Miller said in a statement.Drummond, 28, is a suspect in the killing of four people in Tiptonville, a town located roughly 125 miles from Memphis. TENNESSEE ASSOCIATES OF QUADRUPLE MURDER SUSPECT ARRESTEDThe victims James M. Wilson, 21, Adrianna Williams, 20, Cortney Rose, 38, and Braydon Williams, 15 were discovered in Tiptonville on Tuesday. An infant found on the front lawn of a random individual's house on July 29 is related to all four of the victims, officials said.Drummond is facing four counts of first-degree murder, one count of aggravated kidnapping and weapons offenses.The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation has so far arrested three individuals that they described as "associates" of Drummond.Giovonte Thomas, 28, Tanaka Brown, 29, and Dearrah Sanders, 23, were all charged with accessory after the fact to first-degree murder in connection with the manhunt forDrummond. Brown also faces one count of tampering with evidence, the agency said.

Over a billion people use Facebook, which means a lot of bad actors are also on the platform trying to exploit users. They use fake accounts, bots, and other tactics to target people, which has led Facebook to put certain guardrails in place and disable accounts that violate them. However, many genuine accounts get caught in the crosshairs and end up being disabled.Richard from Dennis Port, MA, recently emailed me describing a similar issue he faced when Facebook disabled his newly created account without any warning:"I have never had a facebook account and decided that I would like to get one. I filled out the information requested, submitted it and received a message saying Welcome to Facebook. Shortly after, I received another message saying that after a review my account has been permanently disabled as it does not meet community standards. There does not seem to be any way of correcting this. Any suggestions?"I understand your concern, Richard. While theres no guaranteed way to get an account reactivated instantly, there are several methods that have helped me recover a Facebook account in less than a day. Ill walk you through these steps and explain how you can try them too.Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, youll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide - free when you join myCYBERGUY.COM/NEWSLETTER.LUCID JOINS TESLA AND GM WITH HANDS-FREE HIGHWAY DRIVINGFacebook may suspend or disable your account if it believes your activity goes against its Community Standards. When that happens, your profile becomes invisible to others, and you'll lose access. You'll know your account has been affected if you get an email from Facebook or see a message that says "We suspended your account" or "We disabled your account" when trying to log in. Here's what else to keep in mind:If your Facebook account was disabled and you believe it was a mistake, follow these proven steps to improve your chances of getting it back quickly.Meta Verified gives you access to real human support from Metas team. This alone makes a massive difference. If you can, subscribe to Meta Verified and use the support chat feature. Theyre much more responsive compared to traditional help forms.When your account is disabled, youre usually given a chance to download your data. Use it. Some of the files include details you might need later, such as your profile link and username.WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)?Before reaching out to support, write a short summary of your case. Mention that your account was likely hacked and wrongfully suspended. If you received password reset emails or login alerts from unfamiliar devices, note the exact timestamps. These details show Meta that the suspension wasnt due to something you did.Now that you're prepared, it's time to contact Meta support. If you're Meta Verified, open a support chat and begin explaining your case. When prompted, share the information you gathered from your downloaded data, including your profile link, username, email address, phone number (if linked), and any screenshots of suspicious login attempts or activity. Support agents are much more likely to escalate your issue if you appear organized and credible from the outset.Be sure to include a timeline of events in your explanation. For example, mention when you received unexpected password reset emails, login alerts from unknown devices, or when you noticed anything else unusual. This helps the support team verify patterns of suspicious behavior and better understand what happened to your account.If you're not Meta Verified, or even if you are, it's still worth submitting Facebook's official form for disabled accounts.GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HEREBe sure to include these items:In the "Additional info" or appeal section:Facebook may ask for a scanned photo of a government-issued ID (passport, driver's license, etc.). Make sure your ID:This is Facebook's main appeal option, so it's worth trying even if you've already contacted support in another way.Account reviews can take anywhere from a few hours to several days. In the meantime, monitor your email inbox and your spam folder for any messages from Facebook. Avoid submitting the form or contacting support multiple times in a short period, as that could delay your case.I often see people complaining about their accounts getting wrongfully disabled after being hacked. This is a widespread and frequent issue, and Im surprised Meta still doesnt have a proper solution in place. Right now, the only workaround seems to be subscribing to Meta Verified, which costs money. If your account has been disabled and you believe it was a mistake, use the data download option, document everything, and contact Meta support through Verified. Its not foolproof. But for now, it is one of the fastest and most reliable ways to recover your account.Do you think Meta is doing enough to help those who get their accounts disabled for no reason?Let us know by writing us atCyberguy.com/Contact.Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, youll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide - free when you join myCYBERGUY.COM/NEWSLETTER.Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com.All rights reserved.

The rights growing chorus of frustration with "Black people" is impossible to ignore. They call it "Black fatigue."They point to the race wars of the 2010s and the DEI takeover of Americas institutions as their breaking point. But after Donald Trump's return to the White House, something shifted.Instead of doubling down on the American creed of individualism, this faction swung hard into collectivism, painting Blacks as a singular problem with the same tired tribal brush they once scorned.Now, some on the right are leaning into posts like this one from Evan Kilgore on X, who wrote: "Why are black people so disproportionately violent? Why do they threaten or act with violence the second they are offended or inconvenienced? Seriouslywhy are so many black people like this?"Its a refrain echoed across countless tweets, each one a lazy slide into tribal identity politics that erases the individual and damns an entire race for the sins of a few.If you think a handful of ugly videos defines every Black person because of shared skin, youre not seeing straightyoure neck-deep in the tribal swamp you claim to hate.I know the violence in my community. Youd be hard-pressed to find anyone on the South Side of Chicago that isnt aware.CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINIONIts raw, its real, and I could sling blame at racism, "the White man," or liberal policies. I could just say, "Thats just Black people." But thats weakness.Tribalism is a crutch, a cheap shot that fuels keyboard wars on X but fixes nothing.The irony burns: a sizable faction on the right, after years of slamming tribalism, now guzzles its easy power. Theyve swapped principle for the rush of collective rage.Where will this lead them? What is their actual end goal?I chose the tougher road. My work is with kidseach one is a distinct soul, not a racial statistic. No two Blacks, no two anyone, are alike. Lifting them up means igniting their personal fire, not boxing them into a racial narrative. (Isnt that how we got into this mess in the first place?) Its hard, its messy, and not everyone makes it. But its the only path that matters. And works.I pour American culture into my youthits demand for individual grit, not "Black" politics or "Black" solutions. Theyre humans first, not pawns in a racial game. The way forward isnt through tribal traps, Right or Left, but through the discipline of forging their own futures.CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM PASTOR COREY BROOKS

Ex-White House deputy chief of staff Bruce Reed is sitting down with congressional investigators probing whether top Biden administration aides covered up signs of mental decline in the former president.Reed arrived just before 10 a.m. on Tuesday, saying nothing to reporters on his way into the closed-door interview with staff on the House Oversight Committee.The longtime Biden ally is the ninth former White House official to appear in the probe and the sixth to come in voluntarily three others, ex-White House doctor Kevin OConnor and former advisors Anthony Bernal and Annie Tomasini, were compelled via congressional subpoena.COMER DISMISSES BIDEN DOCTOR'S BID FOR PAUSE IN COVER-UP PROBE: 'THROWING OUT EVERY EXCUSE'House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, R-Ky., is investigating whether former President Joe Bidens inner circle covered up signs of mental decline, and whether that means autopen signatures were used for executive decisions without Bidens full awareness. Of particular interest to investigators are the myriad clemency orders signed toward the end of Bidens presidency.But the former president and his allies have pushed back on any allegations of impropriety. Biden himself told The New York Times last month that he was behind every decision made on pardons and commutations.Reed, like many of those who appeared before him, has a relationship with Biden going back over a decade.He was chief of staff to the vice president under the Obama administration from January 2011 until December 2013. Reeds tenure in that role was bookended by Ron Klain and Steve Ricchetti, respectively both of whom have already spoken to House investigators on voluntary terms.It's not likely, however, that Reed's testimony will provide any sort of smoking gun for investigators.The Biden allies who have appeared voluntarily so far have all asserted they believed the ex-president was fully capable of being commander-in-chief, though some, like Klain, have conceded his memory got duller over time.Others, like Ricchetti and ex-senior advisor Mike Donilon, suggested they believed Biden remained as sharp as ever and would have been for another four years, sources said previously.In contrast, those who appeared under subpoena all pleaded the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering any substantive questions.LONGTIME BIDEN AIDE SAYS HE STOOD TO EARN UP TO $8M HAD PRESIDENT WON RE-ELECTIONReed was reportedly among the former aides dubbed as part of Biden's "Politburo" calling shots at the White House toward the end of his term, according to Axios reporter Alex Thompson and CNN host Jake Tapper, who wrote, "Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again."No lawmakers are expected to sit in for Reed's transcribed interview; it's common for such sit-downs to be staff-led by lawyers for both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.It could go on for several hours, however. All the five transcribed interviews before Reed's took at least four hours. Ricchetti's notably went roughly eight hours.