Former President Joe Bidens aggressive prostate cancer diagnosis has raised questions about prevention and detection.The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends that men aged 55 to 69 discuss the potential benefits and risks of PSA (prostate-specific antigen) screening with their healthcare provider and make an individual decision about screening.They recommend that men over the age of 70 skip screenings altogether.DR. MARC SIEGEL: BIDEN'S PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS REVEALS DANGEROUS FLAW IN SCREENING GUIDELINESThe USPSTF is a "commonly used" resource, although other agencies and associations offer varying guidelines, according to Dr. Shawn Dason, a urologic oncologist at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center.Dason stressed that it's important for men in their 50s and 60s to confer with their healthcare providers to make shared decisions on screening."They should engage in a discussion about the topic of prostate cancer and the role of PSA in screening and the potential benefits and harms," he said.Theres a "little bit of variability" in whether men under age 50 and over 70 should be screened due to potential risks, which can include over-treatment or unnecessary treatment, Dason said.In past decades, "we didn't really have an understanding of the nuances about when prostate cancer should be treated and when [it] should just be observed in a protocol called active surveillance," he said.GLEASON SCORE FOR PROSTATE CANCER: WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT BIDEN'S DIAGNOSISIt is possible for some men to be over-treated after a diagnosis, he also said.In certain cases, the cancer may not have led to death or other clinical problems but the treatment could cause "bothersome" urinary, sexual or bowel-related side effects, Dason said."You might be diagnosed with a prostate cancer that is not likely to actually cause your death or create any other problem for you," he said."You might then receive treatment for that prostate cancer and the treatment might be worse than the actual impact of the cancer itself."JOE BIDEN DIAGNOSED WITH AGGRESSIVE FORM OF PROSTATE CANCER WITH METASTASIS TO THE BONEThere is "much more limited data" to support that screening over the age of 70 could save a man's life from prostate cancer, Dason noted, while it's "pretty clear" that the harms of prostate cancer treatment increase with age."Screening could reduce the chance of death in some cases, however, which is why it's important to have a discussion with a doctor, according to Dason.Men who don't have symptoms but are considered of "average population risk" should be screened, he advised."Having symptoms is a totally different conversation," he said.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER"Generally, when we use the term screening, we're talking about somebody who is not having any symptoms They're having an annual health checkup."Fox News' senior medical analyst Dr. Marc Siegel revealed that hes been "bothered" by the guidelines not recommending routine prostate cancer screening, particularly for those over age 70."Studies have shown that use of the PSA has fallen off in men over the age of 40 as a result of the USPSTF recommendation," he wrote in a recent op-ed for Fox News Digital.For more Health articles, visitwww.foxnews.com/health"This is particularly disturbing considering that there are over 300,000 new cases of prostate cancer in the U.S. diagnosed every year, with over 35,000 deaths, many of which may be preventable with earlier diagnosis."Siegel noted that treatment options have advanced over the years, and are now better tolerated with fewer side effects for patients at various stages and ages."Many critics are saying that a president of the United States should have the most aggressive prostate cancer screening regardless simply because he is president," he said."But I am saying that all men over the age of 45 should have this screening. Period. Regardless of age."Dason agreed that some men aged 70 and older are appropriate candidates for screening."If you're in good health, and you're going to have a reasonable life expectancy, the diagnosis of [a serious] prostate cancer could have a big impact on extending that life or improving your quality of life."By contrast, men who are not great candidates due to health issues and limited life expectancy face greater harm from a screening than benefit, he clarified."I would encourage men to think about their situation and have a conversation with their medical provider."

'OutKick' founder Clay Travis and political strategist Lucy Caldwell join 'MediaBuzz' to discuss the media's cover-up of former President Joe Biden's health decline following his cancer diagnosis.

Will Power and his wife shared a story of overcoming adversity outside of the race track.

Actor Gary Sinise discusses how his foundation honors military members and veterans on Fox News Sunday.

A great deal of mirth and ribbing has been directed at CNNs Jake Tapper in recent days over his co-authoring of a tell-all blockbuster book about how awful he and his colleagues are at their jobs.But last week, during one of his approximately 27 million TV appearances to hawk, "Original Sin," the book on the Biden administrations lies that he dashed off with Axios Alex Thompson as soon as the 2024 election was over, Tapper said something that was so close to really understanding his subject and his job that it almost hurt.'THE VIEW' MELTS DOWN OVER LATEST BIDEN BOOK, SLAMS CNN FOR 'HAWKING' ITAppearing on CBS News, Tapper said, "So, there were people reporting on what they saw. The conservative media was, to their credit, all over this. Now, they didn't have insider information, but they were just making sense of all the clips, and all of the weird moments, and off-putting moments."What Tapper misses here is that conservative media didnt get it right in regard to Joe Bidens obvious and abject unfitness for office in spiteof not having insider information, they got it right becausethey were not relying on insider information.In Tappers twisted view of journalism, and it is one widely shared, the evidence we see with our own eyes is not sufficient. Instead, it isnt news until some whistleblower spills the beans, which puts all the power in the hands of sources.Since the Watergate scandal of the 1970s, everything has to be a Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein-style scoop. A story isnt real without some turncoat in the administration, even though they, too, have agendas.Obviously, the big problem here is that all of Tapper and Thompsons sources spent years deceiving them and the American people, but now, suddenly, we are expected to believe everything these same serial liars say.Sorry. Not happening.Lets take the tempting tale being spun by Tapper and Thompson now that it was actually first son Hunter Biden who was running the show. It's delicious, maybe the crack-addled Burisma executive really is the smartest man Joe ever met. The artist behind the curtain.However, and call me a cynic if you will, this particular version of events just so happens to be the one that paints Tapper and Thompsons insider sources in the best possible light.Basically, what these insiders are saying is, "Man, we really tried to do the right thing, but that Hunter, he just blocked us at every chance, which is too bad because he has a pardon for anything he did with the autopen now, but what can you do?"And once again, Tapper and Thompson just eagerly write it all down as if they were standing atop Mt. Sinai taking dictation of the Ten Commandments from God.The bottom line is that even if you are a generous soul inclined to trust Tapper and Thompson, only a fool would trust their insider sources. So honestly, what is the point of even reading the book?This speaks to a much deeper problem with journalism which tends to frame all political coverage as a government that is lying and intrepid reporters sussing out the actual truth when that is almost never what actually happens.Instead, these journalists confuse sourcing with access, so all their "sources" are people advancing their agenda. Now, suddenly, the agenda is to pile on Biden and salvage our reputations (for media AND insiders).George Orwell said, "Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations."Tapper and Thompson have both been doing a lot of PR for Democrats for a very long time.CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINIONA source, especially an anonymous source, is almost by definition only telling a reporter something they want the reporter to print. It can sometimes be helpful, but it is never the whole story.The hilarious final twist in all of this is that in Donald Trump, we have a president who takes more questions than the average corporate call center and owns everything the press accuses him of from sending migrants to El Salvadoran jails to holding Crypto Balls at his resort. It's all just out in the open.The age of post-Watergate "gotcha" journalism has driven the industry off of a cliff. Nobody believes what journalists say because they are just mouthpieces for those in power.The primary job of the journalist isnt to pry out some hidden information being kept from people; They arent detectives. It is to accurately report on and analyze what we know is happening.In that regard, the coverage of Joe Bidens decline, his clear inability to serve, is arguably the worst journalism that ever been attempted. Tapper and Thompson couldnt see what was right in front of their face because they were convinced there had to be something deeper, something hidden.It is time to turn the page and get back to a journalism that deals in reality, not speculation. Until that happens, Americans have no reason to believe anything the Jake Tappers and Alex Thompsons of the world tell them.CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DAVID MARCUS

Members of former President Joe Biden's inner circle "weren't telling the truth" when describing him as "sharp," "focused" and "detail-oriented," Axios national political correspondent Alex Thompson said Sunday adding that the media fell short in challenging the narrative.The co-author of the new book "Original Sin," which details what many view as a calculated, years-long effort to conceal the former president's decline in the run-up to the 2024 election, joined "Fox News Sunday" to shed light on the inner workings of the Biden White House."They weren't telling the truth, and I think the book really conclusively shows what was going on behind the scenes," he said, weighing in on a series of statements from top Biden officials including then-Homeland Security Sec. Alejandro Mayorkas, former press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and former Chief of Staff Ron Klain who, at various times, portrayed Biden as intellectually sharp and fully in control.AXIOS REPORTER PUSHES BACK ON BIDEN'S DENIAL OF MENTAL DECLINE, SAYING WHITE HOUSE INSIDERS DISAGREEJean-Pierre even dismissed "right-wing critics" by blaming "cheap fake" videos and selectively edited media.But, according to Thompson, the reality behind closed doors told a different story."Throughout 2023 and 2024, there were steps taken to increasingly shield Joe Biden not just from the public, but from members of his own cabinet, members of his own senior staff," he said."One White House official who left in 2024 told us that they left in part because they were not comfortable with how they were trying to shield the extent of the decline."JAKE TAPPER'S PAST COVERAGE OF BIDEN'S COGNITIVE DECLINE UNDER SCRUTINY AHEAD OF HIS NEW BOOKThompson said Biden's condition became harder to conceal as time went on, and the now infamous debate performance against then-candidate Donald Trump in June 2024 shattered any remaining illusions."The Joe Biden that people saw on that debate stage I think the book really shows it was not the first time that Joe Biden had acted like that. You can also listen to the tapes from the Robert Hur investigation. I think you can sort of hear debate Biden, and there were increasingly frantic efforts to make sure that the public did not see debate Biden while the public did see that he was aging," he continued.Thompson said Biden's debate performance was likely a "shock" to millions of Americans who finally saw the "extent" of the slippage.Fox News Digital has written extensively dating back to the 2020 presidential campaign about former President Joe Biden's cognitive decline and his inner circles role in covering it up.

Atlanta Falcons quarterback Kirk Cousins poked fun at Travis Kelces hairy back as a photo of the Kansas City Chiefs star went viral across social media last week.Cousins spoke to E! News during the week and was among those who weighed in on the tight end while he was at the grand opening of Universal Epic Universe in Orlando, Florida.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM"God bless Taylor Swift for being good with that," he told the outlet. "That's awesome. Good for her."Cousins chalked up Kelces hairy situation to "genetics" and said he was happy he didnt have to deal with that.Kelce is known for having a big beard around his chin during NFL games. He spoke about his body hair with his brother Jason in the latest episode of the "New Heights" podcast.JOURNALIST TIM COWLISHAW TAKES AIM AT ESPN AS 'AROUND THE HORN' CONCLUDES 22-YEAR RUN"You guys haven't seen the Yeti come out of here," the three-time Super Bowl champion said. "You don't want to see the Yeti come out."He recalled playing basketball in college at Cincinnati and having to play shirts against skins."I had the big beard, I had the long hair. I had the chest hair, back hair, arm hair, leg hair. It's just a big ole Yeti out there, man," he said. "All the homies on the court were calling me 'Big Yeti."Kelce is set to play in Year 13 for the Chiefs. He had 97 catches for 823 yards and three touchdowns for the Chiefs in 2024. Kansas City made it all the way back to the Super Bowl but lost to the Philadelphia Eagles.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

'OutKick' founder Clay Travis and political strategist Lucy Caldwell join 'MediaBuzz' to discuss the media's cover-up of former President Joe Biden's health decline following his cancer diagnosis.

Will Power and his wife shared a story of overcoming adversity outside of the race track.

Actor Gary Sinise discusses how his foundation honors military members and veterans on Fox News Sunday.