AtoZ Buzz! Take Control of the narrative AtoZ Buzz! Take Control of the narrative AtoZ Buzz! Take Control of the narrative
Результаты поиска
Все результаты

    Вступить

    Войти Регистрация
    Theme Switcher
    Ночной режим
    © 2025 AtoZ Buzz! Take Control of the narrative
    Forums Rules • Private Messaging Rules • О нас • Условия использования • Конфиденциальность • Свяжитесь с нами • Каталог

    Языки

    English Arabic French Spanish Portuguese Deutsch Turkish Dutch Italiano Russian Romaian Portuguese (Brazil) Greek

Главная

Reels

Мероприятия

Найти Мероприятия Мои события

Статьи пользователей

Найти Статьи пользователей

Маркет

Найти Маркет

Группы

Найти Группы Мои группы

Страницы

Найти Страницы Понравились страницы

Ещё

Популярные записи Найти сообщения Offers Jobs Форумы Разработчики Merits
Маркет Статьи пользователей Страницы Группы
Мероприятия Jobs Offers Смотреть все

Каталог

Знакомьтесь и заводите новых друзей

  • Пользователи
  • Записей
  • Страницы
  • Группы
  • Мероприятия
  • Newsfeed поделился ссылкой
    2025-05-25 14:59:02 ·
    WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    Rob Gronkowski & 'INDYCAR on FOX' Crew welcome you to the Indy 500 | INDYCAR on FOX
    Rob Gronkowski and the "INDYCAR on FOX" crew welcomed fans to the Indy 500, kicking off the race day coverage in style.
    ·6 Просмотры ·0 предпросмотр
    Войдите, чтобы отмечать, делиться и комментировать!
  • Newsfeed поделился ссылкой
    2025-05-25 14:59:02 ·
    WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    MSNBC host questions why anyone should trust anonymous Biden secretaries speaking out on concerns of decline
    MSNBC's Eugene Daniels wondered why anyone should trust the former Biden secretaries who spoke to Alex Thompson and Jake Tapper about Biden's decline during "The Weekend" on Saturday.
    ·6 Просмотры ·0 предпросмотр
    Войдите, чтобы отмечать, делиться и комментировать!
  • Newsfeed поделился ссылкой
    2025-05-25 14:59:02 ·
    WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    'Original Sin' co-author admits media failed to 'probe enough' into Biden's 'behind the scenes' decline
    Axios national political correspondent Alex Thompson, co-author of 'Original Sin,' on the media's widespread reluctance to probe into former President Biden's cognitive decline and the internal White House coverup.
    ·6 Просмотры ·0 предпросмотр
    Войдите, чтобы отмечать, делиться и комментировать!
  • Newsfeed поделился ссылкой
    2025-05-25 14:59:02 ·
    WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    Rand Paul rips 'big beautiful bill' for 'wimpy and anemic' spending cuts
    Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., joins 'Fox News Sunday' to discuss the future of President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' as the GOP works through budget cuts.
    ·6 Просмотры ·0 предпросмотр
    Войдите, чтобы отмечать, делиться и комментировать!
  • Newsfeed поделился ссылкой
    2025-05-25 14:59:04 ·
    WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    Prostate cancer screening after 70: Experts question guidance after Biden's diagnosis
    Former President Joe Bidens aggressive prostate cancer diagnosis has raised questions about prevention and detection.The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends that men aged 55 to 69 discuss the potential benefits and risks of PSA (prostate-specific antigen) screening with their healthcare provider and make an individual decision about screening.They recommend that men over the age of 70 skip screenings altogether.DR. MARC SIEGEL: BIDEN'S PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS REVEALS DANGEROUS FLAW IN SCREENING GUIDELINESThe USPSTF is a "commonly used" resource, although other agencies and associations offer varying guidelines, according to Dr. Shawn Dason, a urologic oncologist at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center.Dason stressed that it's important for men in their 50s and 60s to confer with their healthcare providers to make shared decisions on screening."They should engage in a discussion about the topic of prostate cancer and the role of PSA in screening and the potential benefits and harms," he said.Theres a "little bit of variability" in whether men under age 50 and over 70 should be screened due to potential risks, which can include over-treatment or unnecessary treatment, Dason said.In past decades, "we didn't really have an understanding of the nuances about when prostate cancer should be treated and when [it] should just be observed in a protocol called active surveillance," he said.GLEASON SCORE FOR PROSTATE CANCER: WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT BIDEN'S DIAGNOSISIt is possible for some men to be over-treated after a diagnosis, he also said.In certain cases, the cancer may not have led to death or other clinical problems but the treatment could cause "bothersome" urinary, sexual or bowel-related side effects, Dason said."You might be diagnosed with a prostate cancer that is not likely to actually cause your death or create any other problem for you," he said."You might then receive treatment for that prostate cancer and the treatment might be worse than the actual impact of the cancer itself."JOE BIDEN DIAGNOSED WITH AGGRESSIVE FORM OF PROSTATE CANCER WITH METASTASIS TO THE BONEThere is "much more limited data" to support that screening over the age of 70 could save a man's life from prostate cancer, Dason noted, while it's "pretty clear" that the harms of prostate cancer treatment increase with age."Screening could reduce the chance of death in some cases, however, which is why it's important to have a discussion with a doctor, according to Dason.Men who don't have symptoms but are considered of "average population risk" should be screened, he advised."Having symptoms is a totally different conversation," he said.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER"Generally, when we use the term screening, we're talking about somebody who is not having any symptoms They're having an annual health checkup."Fox News' senior medical analyst Dr. Marc Siegel revealed that hes been "bothered" by the guidelines not recommending routine prostate cancer screening, particularly for those over age 70."Studies have shown that use of the PSA has fallen off in men over the age of 40 as a result of the USPSTF recommendation," he wrote in a recent op-ed for Fox News Digital.For more Health articles, visitwww.foxnews.com/health"This is particularly disturbing considering that there are over 300,000 new cases of prostate cancer in the U.S. diagnosed every year, with over 35,000 deaths, many of which may be preventable with earlier diagnosis."Siegel noted that treatment options have advanced over the years, and are now better tolerated with fewer side effects for patients at various stages and ages."Many critics are saying that a president of the United States should have the most aggressive prostate cancer screening regardless simply because he is president," he said."But I am saying that all men over the age of 45 should have this screening. Period. Regardless of age."Dason agreed that some men aged 70 and older are appropriate candidates for screening."If you're in good health, and you're going to have a reasonable life expectancy, the diagnosis of [a serious] prostate cancer could have a big impact on extending that life or improving your quality of life."By contrast, men who are not great candidates due to health issues and limited life expectancy face greater harm from a screening than benefit, he clarified."I would encourage men to think about their situation and have a conversation with their medical provider."
    ·6 Просмотры ·0 предпросмотр
    Войдите, чтобы отмечать, делиться и комментировать!
  • Newsfeed поделился ссылкой
    2025-05-25 14:59:04 ·
    WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    Aaron Rodgers reveals team he has no interest playing for as free agency decision looms
    Aaron Rodgers has yet to make a decision on whether to sign with a new team for the 2025 season after two years with the New York Jets or walk away from the game altogether.He made clear over the weekend that theres at least one team he will not be signing with the New Orleans Saints.The Saints could be in need of a quarterback as the organization weighs whether to go with Tyler Shough, Spencer Rattler or someone else to start the year as Derek Carr retired following a serious shoulder injury.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COMRodgers was in Texas for a live episode of the "YNK Podcast" and was asked by a fan whether he would consider playing for the Saints."No," Rodgers replied without any hesitation. "Thats the answer. Ive played there a couple times, but no, the answer is no. Im too old. I dont want to live in Louisiana. Sorry."All signs have pointed to Rodgers playing with the Pittsburgh Steelers but the pen has not been put to paper.STEELERS STAR LINEBACKER SAYS AARON RODGERS FREE AGENCY SAGA IS NOT A 'DISTRACTION AT ALL'He was also asked during the show whether he would consider playing with the Chicago Bears. In his answer, he dropped one of the biggest hints yet that he had his sights on Pittsburgh."No, but I believe there's a team that might play in Chicago this year on a road trip," he said. "I don't know, not sure. Got to check it out. I love Chicago, though. Way more than they love me. It's been a great relationship. All one-way."The Steelers will play in Chicago on Nov. 23.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
    ·6 Просмотры ·0 предпросмотр
    Войдите, чтобы отмечать, делиться и комментировать!
  • Newsfeed поделился ссылкой
    2025-05-25 14:59:04 ·
    WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    WNBA star Brittney Griner gives refs an earful during halftime interview: 'Be f---ing better'
    Atlanta Dream center Brittney Griner was irate at WNBA officials on Saturday night and let them know about it as the team handed the Dallas Wings their fourth straight defeat.Griner was about to talk to CBS Sports for a halftime interview when the officials walked behind her. She turned around and complained about how she was being fouled during the contest. She was then heard yelling an expletive as the officials went back to the locker room.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM"Be f---ing better," she said.WARNING: EXPLICIT LANGUAGEGriner apologized to those watching at home for her profane outburst.She finished with 15 points and eight rebounds as the Dream won the game, 83-75. Allisha Gray led the game with 27 points, six assists and five rebounds.CAITLIN CLARK FURIOUS WITH WNBA REFS AFTER THEY FAILED TO WHISTLE A FOUL BY NATASHA CLOUD FOR HARD CONTACTGriner joined the Dream in the offseason after she spent the first 12 seasons of her career with the Phoenix Mercury. She was a part of a harrowing situation in 2022 when she was arrested in Russia on drug charges and held there until she was a part of a prisoner swap for Viktor Bout, known as "The Merchant of Death."She played two more seasons in Phoenix after she returned home. A two-time WNBA Defensive Player of the Year, she averaged 17.7 points and 7.4 rebounds during her time with the Mercury.In four games in Atlanta this season, she has averaged 14.8 points and 7.8 rebounds per game.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
    ·6 Просмотры ·0 предпросмотр
    Войдите, чтобы отмечать, делиться и комментировать!
  • Newsfeed поделился ссылкой
    2025-05-25 14:59:04 ·
    WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    Hackers are bypassing fingerprint scanners to steal your identity
    Fingerprint sensors have been around for quite some time, and theyve become a standard feature in most smartphones. Apple introduced Touch ID on the iPhone 5s in 2013. Since then, it has appeared on 12 major iPhone models (and some iPads as well).Though Apple removed it from most phones after the iPhone 8, its still found in the iPhone SE series. On the flip side, almost every Android phone on the market has a fingerprint scanner. But are fingerprint scanners impossible to bypass? Frank from Deerton, Michigan, asked a similar question that I want to highlight and address because it helps all of us:"Can a website be hacked/compromised with password and fingerprint protection (multiple verification)?"I get what youre saying, Frank. Youd think that since a fingerprint scanner literally requires your fingerprint, it couldnt be bypassed. But youd be wrong. While fingerprint scanners are generally more secure than facial recognition and passwords, theyre not foolproof. In fact, there are several ways bad actors can bypass them to steal your identity.Join The FREE CyberGuy Report: Get my expert tech tips, critical security alerts and exclusive deals plus instant access to myfree Ultimate Scam Survival Guide when you sign up!There are multiple ways hackers use to bypass fingerprint scanners. Below, I will discuss five of the more prominent methods.Hackers exploit the concept of "masterprints," which are fingerprints engineered to match multiple individuals' prints. Researchers atNYU Tandon developed "DeepMasterPrints" using machine learning to generate synthetic fingerprints that can deceive sensors by mimicking common fingerprint features. These artificial prints can match with a significant percentage of stored fingerprints, especially on devices with less stringent security settings.Another trick hackers use is making fake fingerprints. They can lift prints off things youve touched and then use stuff like fabric glue or even 3D printers to make molds. For example,researchers at Cisco Talos tried out a bunch of different ways to do this using 3D printing and tested them on phones like the iPhone 8 and Samsung S10; laptops like the Samsung Note 9, Lenovo Yoga and HP Pavilion X360; and even smart gadgets like padlocks.On average, the fake fingerprints worked about 80% of the time. They were able to fool the sensors at least once. Interestingly, they couldnt crack the biometric systems on Windows 10 devices, but they pointed out that doesnt necessarily mean those are more secure. It just means this particular method didnt work on them.19 BILLION PASSWORDS HAVE LEAKED ONLINE: HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELFAttackers have found a cheap way to break into smartphones by brute force fingerprint authentication. The method, called BrutePrint, lets attackers get around the usual limits that stop too many failed fingerprint attempts. It works by taking advantage of two previously unknown flaws in the fingerprint system. These flaws, named Cancel-After-Match-Fail (CAMF) and Match-After-Lock (MAL), exist because of weak protection for fingerprint data on a part of the hardware called the Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI).Basically, BrutePrint uses a hardware-based man-in-the-middle attack to hijack fingerprint data. It sits between the fingerprint sensor and the phones secure area (called the Trusted Execution Environment) and tries as many fingerprint images as needed until it finds a match. The relieving part is that the attacker needs to have physical access to the phone for this method to work.PrintListener is a side-channel attack that captures the sound of a finger swiping on a screen to extract fingerprint features. It might sound like something out of a sci-fi movie, but researchers have already built a proof of concept. By analyzing the friction sounds, attackers can reconstruct fingerprint patterns, potentially enhancing the effectiveness of masterprint attacks.Some devices store fingerprint data without adequate encryption. If attackers gain access to this unprotected data, they can replicate fingerprints to bypass authentication. For example, in 2024, a misconfigured server exposed nearly 500 GB of sensitive biometric data, including fingerprints, facial scans and personal details of law enforcement applicants.TOP 20 APPS TRACKING YOU EVERY DAYFingerprint scanners make it easy and fairly secure to unlock your devices. Since everyone has unique fingerprints, you dont need to remember complicated passwords. Just a quick touch and you are in. Most modern devices store your fingerprint data in secure parts of the system, and they use things like liveness detection to make sure someone is not trying to trick the scanner with a fake finger.Still, no security method is perfect. Skilled attackers have found ways to get past fingerprint scanners using high-resolution photos or 3D-printed fingers or by taking advantage of flaws in how the scanner communicates with the rest of the device. The risk really depends on how well the scanner is designed and how much effort someone puts into breaking it. For most people, fingerprint authentication is quick, easy and secure enough. However, if you are dealing with very sensitive information, relying only on biometrics might not be the best idea.HOW TO REMOVE YOUR PERSONAL INFO FROM PEOPLE SEARCH SITES10 SIMPLE STEPS TO IMPROVE YOUR SMARTPHONES SECURITY AND PRIVACYSafeguard your biometric identity with these essential security measures.1. Choose trusted phone brands:If you're buying a phone, stick with well-known brands like Apple, Samsung or Google. These companies take extra steps to protect your fingerprint data by storing it in secure areas of the phone that are harder to access. Cheaper or lesser-known brands may not have these protections, which makes it easier for attackers to steal your data.2. Keep your phone updated:Phone updates are not just about new features. They fix security problems that hackers might use to break into your device. If your phone asks you to install an update, do it. Most phones also let you turn on automatic updates, so you dont have to worry about remembering. Keeping your software updated is one of the easiest and most important ways to stay protected.3. Use strong antivirus software: Install strong antivirus software to detect malware that could compromise biometric data storage.Strong antivirus software offers real-time threat detection, anti-phishing and privacy features to block unauthorized access to fingerprint data. The best way to safeguard yourself from malicious links that install malware, potentially accessing your private information, is to have strong antivirus software installed on all your devices. This protection can also alert you to phishing emails and ransomware scams, keeping your personal information and digital assets safe.Get my picks for the best 2025 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android and iOS devices.WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)?4. Dont rely only on your fingerprint:Using a fingerprint to unlock your phone is convenient, but it shouldnt be your only line of defense, especially for sensitive apps like banking or email. Always set up a PIN, password or pattern as a backup on youriPhone andAndroid. This way, even if someone manages to copy your fingerprint, they still need another piece of information to get in.5. Be careful about who handles your phone:If someone else uses your phone, especially a stranger or someone you dont know well, they might be able to copy your fingerprint from the screen. Its rare, but it happens. To reduce this risk, avoid handing your phone to people unnecessarily and wipe your screen occasionally to remove any clear fingerprints.6. Only use fingerprint login with trusted apps:Not every app that asks for your fingerprint is trustworthy. Its safest to use fingerprint login only with apps from known and reliable companies, like your bank, phone manufacturer or email provider. If an unfamiliar app asks for fingerprint access, its better to skip it and use your password instead.7. Consider using a personal data removal service: Even fingerprint scanners can be bypassed, and large amounts of personal and biometric data have been exposed in breaches. Using a personal data removal service helps reduce your risk by removing your sensitive information from public databases and data broker sites, making it harder for hackers to piece together details that could be used to steal your identity.Check out my top picks for data removal services here.Get afree scanto find out if your personal information is already out on the web.WHAT HACKERS CAN LEARN ABOUT YOU FROM A DATA BROKER FILEPasswords are generally easier to hack than biometric data like fingerprints or facial recognition. However, the key difference is that passwords can be changed if theyre compromised. Your biometrics cannot. Most modern devices allow both options, and biometrics can offer an extra layer of security by making it harder for someone else to access your phone or apps. They're also fast and convenient, since you dont need to remember or type anything. That said, in most cases, your device still falls back on a password or PIN when biometric identification doesnt work, so both systems often go hand in hand.With the increasing sophistication of methods to bypass fingerprint security, what should companies be doing to stay ahead of these threats and better protect user data? Let us know by writing us atCyberguy.com/ContactFor more of my tech tips and security alerts, subscribe to my free CyberGuy Report Newsletter by heading toCyberguy.com/NewsletterAsk Kurt a question or let us know what stories you'd like us to coverFollow Kurt on his social channelsAnswers to the most asked CyberGuy questions:New from Kurt:Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
    ·6 Просмотры ·0 предпросмотр
    Войдите, чтобы отмечать, делиться и комментировать!
  • Newsfeed поделился ссылкой
    2025-05-25 14:59:04 ·
    WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    Too busy to rest: Your time off is important for your health and productivity so use it!
    The email sits in Kyles inbox: "Please submit your vacation plans for the year." He glances at his project timeline, then at the family photo his kids beaming from last summer's brief weekend at the lake. His calendar is packed with deadlines stretching into next quarter. There's never a "good" time, he thinks, moving the email to his "Later" folder for the third time this month.Like Kyle, millions of Americans find themselves in this cycle postponing vacations and stockpiling unused leave days, convinced next month will be less busy. Each year, workers leave billions of dollars worth of paid time off (PTO) unused, effectively gifting these earned benefits back to their employers. But this isn't just about unused benefits it's about how humans function at their best.Employees often blame a toxic work culture, demands for overwork, or unsupportive bosses as reasons why they dont take available leave. But whether parental leave, sick leave, or general PTO, employer support for employee time off exist for a reason because employees and the companies they work for are all better off when people can take a break from work. Heres why.IVANKA TRUMP MAKES COST RICA SPLASH VACATIONING WITH EXTENDED FAMILY FOR SPRING BREAKFirst, its about health. Chronic stress and burnout have measurable negative impacts on physical and mental health, including risks of cardiovascular issues, anxiety, and depression. This is especially true for long periods of uninterrupted work without proper breaks. Taking vacation time allows the body and mind to repair and reset.This also has direct effects on productivity. While it may seem counterintuitive, research has found that taking time off actually improves workplace performance. This is in part because the human brain requires periods of rest to maintain peak cognitive function. This is especially relevant for knowledge workers who need focus, or service workers who need regulation. Studies show that after a vacation, employees return with enhanced creativity, better problem-solving abilities, and renewed energy.Such breaks are also helpful for innovation and creativity. Distance from daily and maybe mundane work routines creates mental space for new perspectives and ideas. Breakthrough insights often erupt during or after vacation time, when minds are free to wander and make novel connections. When a break is spent in nature, that can be all the more inspiring. So taking true breaks can be considered especially important for jobs which rely on stellar innovation and creativity.Its not just about whether or not to take that vacation its also about who does it. Peer pressure matters, but managers and leaders especially set the tone at the top. When employees, especially leaders, don't take vacation time, it creates an unhealthy workplace culture which normalizes overwork. By taking your vacation, you help establish healthy boundaries and give permission for others to do the same. This is not only helpful for setting the standards for your current employees, but also showcasing a culture that will make other talented individuals want to work with and for you as no one wants to work at the place where it feels expected to never take time off.Another concern of managers is how leave policies look on paper, as compared to how they are actually implemented. Results from my own research interviewing working mothers discovered a theme of resentment against companies that espoused having family-friendly workplaces with paid leave, that was then felt as deeply hypocritical when individual managers werent supportive of their folks taking such leave. This is when a policy designed to help or support employees can end up not providing that support there is a gap between what is written and what is unwritten. This means that employers often feel good about having the policies on paper, and either arent aware or dont care if employees ever actually use them. The box is checked but is the support actually delivered? HR professionals call this the "implementation gap," and it can have deeply negative effects on employee commitment and identification with their employer.Beyond work, relationships with family and friends require quality time to nurture and maintain. Vacation allows for creating meaningful memories, strengthening bonds, and pursuing that ever-elusive balance between work and life responsibilities. Our connections with others provide the emotional support system that makes us more resilient at work. Without time devoted to those connections, that support is weakened.So dont be like Kyle and dont postpone your vacations until later take them now. Whether a day, week, or longer, take the time you need to replenish your energy, restore your well-being, and rejuvenate your relationships with important people in your life. Managers and leaders, make sure that your leave policies are well-communicated and well-executed. Set the standard with your own behavior as you personally and professionally benefit from taking that vacation. Your job will still be there when you get back stronger, more energized, and more resilient than before.
    ·11 Просмотры ·0 предпросмотр
    Войдите, чтобы отмечать, делиться и комментировать!
  • Newsfeed поделился ссылкой
    2025-05-25 14:59:05 ·
    WWW.FOXNEWS.COM
    Prostate cancer screening after 70: Experts question guidance after Biden's diagnosis
    Former President Joe Bidens aggressive prostate cancer diagnosis has raised questions about prevention and detection.The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends that men aged 55 to 69 discuss the potential benefits and risks of PSA (prostate-specific antigen) screening with their healthcare provider and make an individual decision about screening.They recommend that men over the age of 70 skip screenings altogether.DR. MARC SIEGEL: BIDEN'S PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS REVEALS DANGEROUS FLAW IN SCREENING GUIDELINESThe USPSTF is a "commonly used" resource, although other agencies and associations offer varying guidelines, according to Dr. Shawn Dason, a urologic oncologist at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center.Dason stressed that it's important for men in their 50s and 60s to confer with their healthcare providers to make shared decisions on screening."They should engage in a discussion about the topic of prostate cancer and the role of PSA in screening and the potential benefits and harms," he said.Theres a "little bit of variability" in whether men under age 50 and over 70 should be screened due to potential risks, which can include over-treatment or unnecessary treatment, Dason said.In past decades, "we didn't really have an understanding of the nuances about when prostate cancer should be treated and when [it] should just be observed in a protocol called active surveillance," he said.GLEASON SCORE FOR PROSTATE CANCER: WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT BIDEN'S DIAGNOSISIt is possible for some men to be over-treated after a diagnosis, he also said.In certain cases, the cancer may not have led to death or other clinical problems but the treatment could cause "bothersome" urinary, sexual or bowel-related side effects, Dason said."You might be diagnosed with a prostate cancer that is not likely to actually cause your death or create any other problem for you," he said."You might then receive treatment for that prostate cancer and the treatment might be worse than the actual impact of the cancer itself."JOE BIDEN DIAGNOSED WITH AGGRESSIVE FORM OF PROSTATE CANCER WITH METASTASIS TO THE BONEThere is "much more limited data" to support that screening over the age of 70 could save a man's life from prostate cancer, Dason noted, while it's "pretty clear" that the harms of prostate cancer treatment increase with age."Screening could reduce the chance of death in some cases, however, which is why it's important to have a discussion with a doctor, according to Dason.Men who don't have symptoms but are considered of "average population risk" should be screened, he advised."Having symptoms is a totally different conversation," he said.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER"Generally, when we use the term screening, we're talking about somebody who is not having any symptoms They're having an annual health checkup."Fox News' senior medical analyst Dr. Marc Siegel revealed that hes been "bothered" by the guidelines not recommending routine prostate cancer screening, particularly for those over age 70."Studies have shown that use of the PSA has fallen off in men over the age of 40 as a result of the USPSTF recommendation," he wrote in a recent op-ed for Fox News Digital.For more Health articles, visitwww.foxnews.com/health"This is particularly disturbing considering that there are over 300,000 new cases of prostate cancer in the U.S. diagnosed every year, with over 35,000 deaths, many of which may be preventable with earlier diagnosis."Siegel noted that treatment options have advanced over the years, and are now better tolerated with fewer side effects for patients at various stages and ages."Many critics are saying that a president of the United States should have the most aggressive prostate cancer screening regardless simply because he is president," he said."But I am saying that all men over the age of 45 should have this screening. Period. Regardless of age."Dason agreed that some men aged 70 and older are appropriate candidates for screening."If you're in good health, and you're going to have a reasonable life expectancy, the diagnosis of [a serious] prostate cancer could have a big impact on extending that life or improving your quality of life."By contrast, men who are not great candidates due to health issues and limited life expectancy face greater harm from a screening than benefit, he clarified."I would encourage men to think about their situation and have a conversation with their medical provider."
    ·11 Просмотры ·0 предпросмотр
    Войдите, чтобы отмечать, делиться и комментировать!
  • Отображение (7731-7740 из 7821)
  • «
  • Назад
  • 772
  • 773
  • 774
  • 775
  • 776
  • Далее
  • »