'Common Sense' Department: Hillary Clinton claims Republican women have become a handmaiden to the patriarchy pretty ironic since this is the same Clinton that lost, suggesting White women voted against her per their husbands direction.

Fox News @ Night panelists Elizabeth Pipko and Jessica Millan Patterson discuss President Donald Trump's phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin and former President Joe Biden's cancer diagnosis.

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld and the 'Gutfeld!' panel discuss an independent filmmaker accusing Malia Obama of ripping off her movie for a Nike commercial.

House Republicans are channeling Edward Hopper this week as they try to pass President Trumps big, "beautiful bill."Hopper is known for "Nighthawks," one of the most iconic paintings in American history. The 1942 painting depicts four people in a diner in the middle of the night. A deserted streetscape commands the foreground. Two men heads festooned with fedoras sit separately at the counter, nursing coffee. One of the men has a cigarette tucked between his index and middle fingers. Hes positioned next to a woman with scarlet hair and a red dress. She appears to holding a bite of a doughnut or sandwich, studying it as though it were a rare artifact. She seems to debate whether she should eat it. A young counterman attired in white with a crisp envelope hat leans downward in search of glassware or dishes hidden underneath.It's the dead of night. Everyone is distant and detached. Even the couple even though they sit side-by-side dont look at each other.In Nighthawks, everyone appears as though theyre just trying to make it through the night to dawn.Its kind of what House Republicans are going through this week.'DEAD OF NIGHT': DEMS ACCUSE GOP OF COWARDICE OVER LATE-NIGHT VOTES ON TRUMP'S 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL' BUDGET BILLThe House Budget Committee convened at 10:26 p.m. ET Sunday night to advance the tax cut and spending reduction package after a hiccup stalled the measure Friday afternoon. At 10:39 p.m. ET, the committee approved the bill 17-16 with four House Republicans voting "present."The next stop is the House Rules Committee, the final parliamentary way station before depositing a piece of legislation on the floor.At 12:31 a.m. ET Monday, the Rules Committee announced it would prep the bill for the floor with a meeting at 1 a.m. Wednesday morning. That session could last all day Wednesday. Literally. The Energy and Commerce panel met for 26 consecutive hours last week to prepare its section of the budget reconciliation measure. The Ways and Means Committee huddled all night long.The group of House Republicans pushing to state and local tax for high-tax states (known as SALT) scheduled a meeting with House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., for 9 p.m. ET Monday. And its entirely possible that the House could be debating or even voting on the measure late Thursday, the wee hours of Friday morning or even Friday night.This is how Capitol Hill rolls when theres a big piece of legislation on the clock. The hours are late. The meetings are long. Lawmakers convene different sessions whenever they need to just to get the measure across the finish line.HITCHHIKER'S GUIDE TO WHERE THE 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL' STANDS, AND WHAT HAPPENS SUNDAY IN THE BUDGET COMMITTEEThe only difference between the halls of Congress now and "Nighthawks" is that the coffee fueled the figures in the painting until dawn. It was 1942. But this is 2025. Edward Hopper would know nothing of Celsius or Red Bull.Theres an actual parliamentary reason as to why the Budget Committee met so late on Sunday night after its stumble on Friday afternoon. And theres a method to the Rules Committees 1 a.m. madness on Wednesday.Lets rewind.The Budget Committee tried to blend the various provisions from nearly a dozen House committees into one unified legislative product midday Friday. That effort came up short. A total of five Budget Committee Republicans voted nay. They groused about spending cuts, green energy tax credits and the timeframe of work requirements for those on Medicaid.Four of the five GOP noes were truly opposed. Rep. Lloyd Smucker, R-Penn., voted nay so he could order a re-vote. Rules allow a member on the winning side of an issue (in this case, the nays), to ask for another vote later. Smucker supported the plan. But he then switched his vote to nay to be on the winning side. That teed up a possible re-vote.REPUBLICANS READY LATE-NIGHT SESSION ON TRUMP'S 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL' AFTER GOP MUTINY"Calling a vote moves the process forward. I think it's a catalyst," said Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Tex., after the failed vote Friday.The Budget Committee then announced it would convene at 10 p.m. ET Sunday.This is where things get interesting:The key here was for the Budget Committee to finish its work before midnight Friday. Once it got rolling, the process would only consume 15 or 20 minutes. The Budget Committee approved the plan 17-16 with four Republicans voting "present.""We're excited about what we did," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., who was one of the GOPers who voted nay Friday.But Norman still wasnt excited enough to vote yes on Sunday night. He voted present."There's so much more that we have to do to rein in government and rein in the costs and the deficits," said Norman on FOX Business Monday.But regardless, the measure was out of the Budget Committee before the witching hour on Sunday. And then came the Rules Committee announcement just after midnight on Monday about a session at 1 a.m. Wednesday to ready the "big, beautiful bill" for the House floor.There are several reasons House Rules Committee Republicans decided to huddle at 1 a.m. et Wednesday. Lets begin with the parliamentary one.HOUSE REPUBLICANS FACE DOWN DEM ATTACKS, PROTESTS TO PULL ALL-NIGHTER ON TRUMP'S 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL'The Budget Committee wrapped up just before midnight Sunday. The rules allow Democrats two full days to file their paperwork and viewpoints after that meeting. So, they had all day Monday and all day Tuesday. The Rules Committee needs an "hour" to announce its formally meeting. So, the "official" announcement of the Rules Committee meeting on Wednesday will go out just after 12:01:01 a.m. ET Wednesday. That triggers a 1 a.m. ET meeting on Wednesday.Here are the other, more practical reasons.Republicans need all the time they can get. There is talk of trying to vote on the floor late in the day on Wednesday. Well see about that. But the early Rules Committee meeting time makes that a possibility.Second of all, its possible the Rules Committee meeting could consume the entire calendar day of Wednesday. Streams of lawmakers from both sides will file into the Rules Committee to propose various amendments. This is a protracted process.But by the same token, meeting at 1 a.m. ET could diminish attendance. After all, who wants to show up at 1 a.m. ET for a meeting and maybe discuss your amendment at 6:30 a.m. ET? You get the idea.And once the bill gets out of the Rules Committee, expect late night meetings among Republicans as they try to close the deal. Its possible the House could vote at virtually any time of day Wednesday, Thursday or Friday to pass the bill. That could be late in the evening. Or even overnight. They will vote when the bill is ready, regardless of the time on the clock.Such is the lot drawn this week by House Republicans for the "big, beautiful bill." Maybe theyll have the votes. Maybe they wont. Maybe theyll pass more spending cuts. Maybe therell be a deal on SALT for state and local taxes. Maybe not. Maybe the vote comes at 3 in the afternoon. But more likely, sometime late at night.Just like in Nighthawks, everyone on Capitol Hill is just trying to make it through the night and to the dawn.

Massachusetts murder suspect Karen Read returned to court Monday for her trial in the death of her former boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, as DNA experts and a digital forensic scientist testified for the prosecution, linking the victim to a lone hair sample found on Read's SUV and tightening up a timeline surrounding the final moments of his life.But under cross-examination, a witness with key new evidence for the state revealed what appears to be an exaggerated resume.O'Keefe, 46, was found dead on Jan. 29, 2022. His then-girlfriend, the now-45-year-old Read, is accused of slamming into him with her 2021 Lexus SUV and leaving him to die on the ground in a blizzard in Canton, a suburb about 20 miles south of Boston.KAREN READ MURDER TRIAL: NIECE REVEALS FRANTIC BEHAVIOR ON MORNING BOSTON OFFICER WAS FOUND DEADKarl Miyasako, a DNA analyst with Bode Technologies in Virginia, testified that mitochondrial DNA testing connected a hair found on the back of Read's vehicle to O'Keefe. However, he testified, the hair is a match to anyone connected to Read's mother's matriarchal line, meaning his niece and nephew could have also been the source.The sample was too small to be tested for autosomal DNA, which could have provided a link to a specific individual with certainty, he said.But the case took an unexpected turn when Shanon Burgess, a Texas-based expert on digital forensics for smartphones and vehicles, admitted that his credentials don't line up with those on his resume.He was on the stand to explain the process and analysis of "black box" data extracted from Read's car. Key information had been missed during the first case, he said, and he found it on a micro SD card and was able to extract it, answering questions left unanswered by an earlier analysis from another expert.KAREN READ JUDGE BLOCKS SANDRA BIRCHMORE MENTIONS; EXPERT SAYS CASES SHOULD BE WAKE-UP CALL FOR POLICEOn cross-examination, however, defense attorney Robert Alessi questioned Burgess' "mendacity," or untrustworthiness, after revealing inconsistencies in the expert's resume.Several versions of it and his official Aperture bio pages describe him as having obtained a bachelor's degree from the University of Alabama, Birmingham, in various years. None of them were correct, he admitted. He does not have a bachelor's degree."I have represented I do not have a bachelor's degree," Burgess told Alessi."But in here," Alessi said, pointing to one of at least three resumes with conflicting dates he introduced as evidence, "you represented that you do, correct?""Yes," Burgess said. "It is in there."Experts say his expertise likely doesn't require one, but it's the appearance of a lie that damages his credibility.GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB"He doesn't need a bachelor of science for this field of technology," said Grace Edwards, a Massachusetts defense attorney who is closely following the case. However, she said, a mix-up could turn off the jury and lead to members completely disregarding his findings, as well as potentially haunt other cases that have already been completed."How many courts has he testified in with a 'padded' CV?" she asked, using an acronym for curriculum vitae, his academic resume.Burgess' testimony regarding the clocks in Read's Lexus and O'Keefe's iPhone could be crucial to the prosecution's case. He said they have a variance of between 21 and 29 seconds, and the victim's last recorded interaction with his phone, pressing the lock button, happened at 12:32:09 a.m.FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON XRead took her car out of reversebetween 12:32:04 and 12:32:12, Burgess testified, based on computer logs recovered from her Lexus.Burgess is expected to return to the stand on Tuesday. Read could face up to life in prison if convicted of the top charge, second-degree murder. She is also charged with drunken driving, manslaughter and fleeing the scene of a deadly accident.She has pleaded not guilty, and her defense denies her vehicle collided with O'Keefe at all.

House Republicans are channeling Edward Hopper this week as they try to pass President Trumps big, "beautiful bill."Hopper is known for "Nighthawks," one of the most iconic paintings in American history. The 1942 painting depicts four people in a diner in the middle of the night. A deserted streetscape commands the foreground. Two men heads festooned with fedoras sit separately at the counter, nursing coffee. One of the men has a cigarette tucked between his index and middle fingers. Hes positioned next to a woman with scarlet hair and a red dress. She appears to holding a bite of a doughnut or sandwich, studying it as though it were a rare artifact. She seems to debate whether she should eat it. A young counterman attired in white with a crisp envelope hat leans downward in search of glassware or dishes hidden underneath.It's the dead of night. Everyone is distant and detached. Even the couple even though they sit side-by-side dont look at each other.In Nighthawks, everyone appears as though theyre just trying to make it through the night to dawn.Its kind of what House Republicans are going through this week.'DEAD OF NIGHT': DEMS ACCUSE GOP OF COWARDICE OVER LATE-NIGHT VOTES ON TRUMP'S 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL' BUDGET BILLThe House Budget Committee convened at 10:26 p.m. ET Sunday night to advance the tax cut and spending reduction package after a hiccup stalled the measure Friday afternoon. At 10:39 p.m. ET, the committee approved the bill 17-16 with four House Republicans voting "present."The next stop is the House Rules Committee, the final parliamentary way station before depositing a piece of legislation on the floor.At 12:31 a.m. ET Monday, the Rules Committee announced it would prep the bill for the floor with a meeting at 1 a.m. Wednesday morning. That session could last all day Wednesday. Literally. The Energy and Commerce panel met for 26 consecutive hours last week to prepare its section of the budget reconciliation measure. The Ways and Means Committee huddled all night long.The group of House Republicans pushing to state and local tax for high-tax states (known as SALT) scheduled a meeting with House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., for 9 p.m. ET Monday. And its entirely possible that the House could be debating or even voting on the measure late Thursday, the wee hours of Friday morning or even Friday night.This is how Capitol Hill rolls when theres a big piece of legislation on the clock. The hours are late. The meetings are long. Lawmakers convene different sessions whenever they need to just to get the measure across the finish line.HITCHHIKER'S GUIDE TO WHERE THE 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL' STANDS, AND WHAT HAPPENS SUNDAY IN THE BUDGET COMMITTEEThe only difference between the halls of Congress now and "Nighthawks" is that the coffee fueled the figures in the painting until dawn. It was 1942. But this is 2025. Edward Hopper would know nothing of Celsius or Red Bull.Theres an actual parliamentary reason as to why the Budget Committee met so late on Sunday night after its stumble on Friday afternoon. And theres a method to the Rules Committees 1 a.m. madness on Wednesday.Lets rewind.The Budget Committee tried to blend the various provisions from nearly a dozen House committees into one unified legislative product midday Friday. That effort came up short. A total of five Budget Committee Republicans voted nay. They groused about spending cuts, green energy tax credits and the timeframe of work requirements for those on Medicaid.Four of the five GOP noes were truly opposed. Rep. Lloyd Smucker, R-Penn., voted nay so he could order a re-vote. Rules allow a member on the winning side of an issue (in this case, the nays), to ask for another vote later. Smucker supported the plan. But he then switched his vote to nay to be on the winning side. That teed up a possible re-vote.REPUBLICANS READY LATE-NIGHT SESSION ON TRUMP'S 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL' AFTER GOP MUTINY"Calling a vote moves the process forward. I think it's a catalyst," said Budget Committee Chairman Jodey Arrington, R-Tex., after the failed vote Friday.The Budget Committee then announced it would convene at 10 p.m. ET Sunday.This is where things get interesting:The key here was for the Budget Committee to finish its work before midnight Friday. Once it got rolling, the process would only consume 15 or 20 minutes. The Budget Committee approved the plan 17-16 with four Republicans voting "present.""We're excited about what we did," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., who was one of the GOPers who voted nay Friday.But Norman still wasnt excited enough to vote yes on Sunday night. He voted present."There's so much more that we have to do to rein in government and rein in the costs and the deficits," said Norman on FOX Business Monday.But regardless, the measure was out of the Budget Committee before the witching hour on Sunday. And then came the Rules Committee announcement just after midnight on Monday about a session at 1 a.m. Wednesday to ready the "big, beautiful bill" for the House floor.There are several reasons House Rules Committee Republicans decided to huddle at 1 a.m. et Wednesday. Lets begin with the parliamentary one.HOUSE REPUBLICANS FACE DOWN DEM ATTACKS, PROTESTS TO PULL ALL-NIGHTER ON TRUMP'S 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL'The Budget Committee wrapped up just before midnight Sunday. The rules allow Democrats two full days to file their paperwork and viewpoints after that meeting. So, they had all day Monday and all day Tuesday. The Rules Committee needs an "hour" to announce its formally meeting. So, the "official" announcement of the Rules Committee meeting on Wednesday will go out just after 12:01:01 a.m. ET Wednesday. That triggers a 1 a.m. ET meeting on Wednesday.Here are the other, more practical reasons.Republicans need all the time they can get. There is talk of trying to vote on the floor late in the day on Wednesday. Well see about that. But the early Rules Committee meeting time makes that a possibility.Second of all, its possible the Rules Committee meeting could consume the entire calendar day of Wednesday. Streams of lawmakers from both sides will file into the Rules Committee to propose various amendments. This is a protracted process.But by the same token, meeting at 1 a.m. ET could diminish attendance. After all, who wants to show up at 1 a.m. ET for a meeting and maybe discuss your amendment at 6:30 a.m. ET? You get the idea.And once the bill gets out of the Rules Committee, expect late night meetings among Republicans as they try to close the deal. Its possible the House could vote at virtually any time of day Wednesday, Thursday or Friday to pass the bill. That could be late in the evening. Or even overnight. They will vote when the bill is ready, regardless of the time on the clock.Such is the lot drawn this week by House Republicans for the "big, beautiful bill." Maybe theyll have the votes. Maybe they wont. Maybe theyll pass more spending cuts. Maybe therell be a deal on SALT for state and local taxes. Maybe not. Maybe the vote comes at 3 in the afternoon. But more likely, sometime late at night.Just like in Nighthawks, everyone on Capitol Hill is just trying to make it through the night and to the dawn.

Massachusetts murder suspect Karen Read returned to court Monday for her trial in the death of her former boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, as DNA experts and a digital forensic scientist testified for the prosecution, linking the victim to a lone hair sample found on Read's SUV and tightening up a timeline surrounding the final moments of his life.But under cross-examination, a witness with key new evidence for the state revealed what appears to be an exaggerated resume.O'Keefe, 46, was found dead on Jan. 29, 2022. His then-girlfriend, the now-45-year-old Read, is accused of slamming into him with her 2021 Lexus SUV and leaving him to die on the ground in a blizzard in Canton, a suburb about 20 miles south of Boston.KAREN READ MURDER TRIAL: NIECE REVEALS FRANTIC BEHAVIOR ON MORNING BOSTON OFFICER WAS FOUND DEADKarl Miyasako, a DNA analyst with Bode Technologies in Virginia, testified that mitochondrial DNA testing connected a hair found on the back of Read's vehicle to O'Keefe. However, he testified, the hair is a match to anyone connected to Read's mother's matriarchal line, meaning his niece and nephew could have also been the source.The sample was too small to be tested for autosomal DNA, which could have provided a link to a specific individual with certainty, he said.But the case took an unexpected turn when Shanon Burgess, a Texas-based expert on digital forensics for smartphones and vehicles, admitted that his credentials don't line up with those on his resume.He was on the stand to explain the process and analysis of "black box" data extracted from Read's car. Key information had been missed during the first case, he said, and he found it on a micro SD card and was able to extract it, answering questions left unanswered by an earlier analysis from another expert.KAREN READ JUDGE BLOCKS SANDRA BIRCHMORE MENTIONS; EXPERT SAYS CASES SHOULD BE WAKE-UP CALL FOR POLICEOn cross-examination, however, defense attorney Robert Alessi questioned Burgess' "mendacity," or untrustworthiness, after revealing inconsistencies in the expert's resume.Several versions of it and his official Aperture bio pages describe him as having obtained a bachelor's degree from the University of Alabama, Birmingham, in various years. None of them were correct, he admitted. He does not have a bachelor's degree."I have represented I do not have a bachelor's degree," Burgess told Alessi."But in here," Alessi said, pointing to one of at least three resumes with conflicting dates he introduced as evidence, "you represented that you do, correct?""Yes," Burgess said. "It is in there."Experts say his expertise likely doesn't require one, but it's the appearance of a lie that damages his credibility.GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB"He doesn't need a bachelor of science for this field of technology," said Grace Edwards, a Massachusetts defense attorney who is closely following the case. However, she said, a mix-up could turn off the jury and lead to members completely disregarding his findings, as well as potentially haunt other cases that have already been completed."How many courts has he testified in with a 'padded' CV?" she asked, using an acronym for curriculum vitae, his academic resume.Burgess' testimony regarding the clocks in Read's Lexus and O'Keefe's iPhone could be crucial to the prosecution's case. He said they have a variance of between 21 and 29 seconds, and the victim's last recorded interaction with his phone, pressing the lock button, happened at 12:32:09 a.m.FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON XRead took her car out of reversebetween 12:32:04 and 12:32:12, Burgess testified, based on computer logs recovered from her Lexus.Burgess is expected to return to the stand on Tuesday. Read could face up to life in prison if convicted of the top charge, second-degree murder. She is also charged with drunken driving, manslaughter and fleeing the scene of a deadly accident.She has pleaded not guilty, and her defense denies her vehicle collided with O'Keefe at all.

Check out the top moments from this MLB game between Cincinnati Reds and the Pittsburgh Pirates!

Check out the top moments from this MLB game between the Chicago Cubs and the Miami Marlins!

Check out the top moments from this MLB game between the Detroit Tigers and the St. Louis Cardinals!