Law & Crime Network correspondent Angenette Levy breaks down the latest news from the Bryan Kohberger case on Fox & Friends Weekend.

RealClearPolitics co-founder Tom Bevan joins Fox & Friends Weekend to discuss the newly released Biden-Hur audio and comments from former administration officials who claim they were unaware of President Bidens mental decline.

Former White House NSC chief of staff Alex Gray reacts to President Donald Trumps recent interview where he discussed the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, is once again calling on his colleagues in the House to impeach President Donald Trump, saying the president has "devolved American democracy into authoritarianism.""I pen this communique with a heavy heart, driven by a conscience that will not allow me to ignore my well-founded, strong pre-election condemnation of Donald John Trump as a threat to American democracy that has now become our reality," Green wrote in a letter urging his colleagues to impeach the president.Green argues that, contrary to what many believe, there does not need to be a constitutional crisis in order to impeach a president.HOUSE DEMOCRAT ANNOUNCES ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST TRUMPOn Thursday, he filed H. Res. 415, "Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, of high crimes and misdemeanors."In the articles of impeachment, Green claims that Trump has engaged in authoritarian rule, violated due process, denigrated federal judges and ignored court orders, including ones from the Supreme Court. He also claims that Trump condoned "untruthful statements" against the Courts opinion regarding the deportation of accused MS-13 member Kilmar Abrego Garcia.TOP HOUSE DEMS SAY THEY'LL JOIN GOP TO QUASH TRUMP IMPEACHMENT EFFORT"An authoritarian does not have to commit a codified statutory offense to be impeached. The constitutional law that authoritarian President Trump would have Congress use to impeach a federal judge for ruling against him (Article II, Section 4 of the United States Constitution) is the same law that has been used, and can be used, to impeach him again for making his threats to democracy a reality," Green wrote in the articles of impeachment, He then vowed to "use that law again."Green is the second member of Congress to issue articles of impeachment against Trump in the presidents second term. Rep. Shri Thanedar, D-Mich., also called for Trumps impeachment, but he later withdrew the bill after getting backlash from party leadership. Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., reportedly called the bill "idiotic," according to Axios. However, Nadler was previously a sponsor of the measure.In his letter, Green made it clear that he was not afraid to "stand alone" against Trump."I encourage all members to vote with their conscience. As for me, I stand where I have stood on impeachment, which is a question of conscience, even when the odds are against me it is better for me to stand alone than not stand at all it wont be the first time," Green wrote.Green has never been silent about his opposition to Trump, even making multiple attempts to impeach the president during his first term. In March 2025, he was removed from Trumps address to a joint session of Congress after he heckled the president. He was eventually censured for the protest.

The Cleveland Cavaliers entered this year's playoffs as the top seed in the Eastern Conference. The Cavs then cruised through a first-round series with the Miami Heat.But the Cavs' second-round series with the Indiana Pacers proved to be much more challenging. The Pacers' 114-105 victory over Cleveland on Tuesday secured the Eastern Semifinals win for Indianapolis. Indy now awaits the winner of the Knicks-Celtics series.Amid the criticism over the Cavs' disappointing playoff run, the team's star guard Donovan Mitchell got caught in former NBA player Kenyon Martin's crosshairs.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COMDuring a recent appearance on Gilbert Arenas' "Gil's Arena Podcast," Martin also took aim at Mitchell's teammates, Darius Garland, Evan Mobley and De'Andre Hunter. Martin expressed his displeasure with those three players' lack of availability in the Eastern Semifinals.PACERS ELIMINATE CAVS TO ADVANCE TO 2ND STRAIGHT EASTERN CONFERENCE FINALS"You dont suit up, bro, give me something? Were already down Darius Garland, we know he aint healthy. We know this going into it, he missed Game 1. So him playing in Game 2 is slim and none. Weve got to this point DeAndre Hunter, when you came in we started playing better. Evan Mobley we rely on you nightly, it aint just your points, its your defensive presence, its you being out there, its something that we could use. When they didnt play in Game 2 Im like, Oh man they aint going to beat nobody, aint got no heart," Martin said."If Im Donovan Mitchell, Im going to that mother f-r like, Yo, man we got to do something. Whoever youve got to go get, whoever youve got to get rid of."The Pacers eliminated the Cavaliers in five games.Follow Fox News Digitals sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

A grandmother in the U.K. who was arrested for holding a sign outside an abortion clinic is sounding the alarm against further attacks on free speech as lawmakers move to expand so-called "buffer zones" outside such facilities.Rose Docherty, 74, was arrested in Glasgow, Scotland near the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH) in February for holding a sign that read: "Coercion is a crime, here to talk if you want."Docherty was the first person to be arrested and charged underthe Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Act, which went into effect in September,the BBC reported.The law prohibits any protests or vigils from taking place within 200m or 656ft of 30 clinics offering abortion services in Scotland, butthe law specifiesthat the Safe Access Zone could be extended if considered appropriate.Dochertys arrest came just days after Vice President JD Vance highlighted the law as an example of free speech being under attack in the U.K.UK WOMAN THREATENED WITH FINE FOR PRAYING WITHIN ABORTION FACILITY'S BUFFER ZONE: GROSSLY ORWELLIANNow, Gillian Mackay, the Green Party parliamentarian responsible for introducing the buffer zones legislation, has now suggested that the Scottish government consider expanding the area of prohibition on "influence" outside hospitals, according to ADF International, a Christian legal advocacy group.Docherty has rejected a formal warning from the Crown Office - arguing that it was "unjust" - and is waiting to find out what action may now be taken against her.In her first broadcast interview since her arrest, she told the BBC she had "no reason to regret" the incident, noting it was an "alarming" and "surreal" experience.She said she had read the law and believed her actions did not violate the legislation."I gave consideration to what I was doingI looked at the law and saw what it said I couldnt do, and thought, OK, well, this is what I can doI can offer to listen, and if anyone wants to come and speak to me, they can do so, only if they want to come and speak with me,"she told BBCs Scotcast.She said she is prepared to go to prison over the offense.Docherty has also said that the government essentially wants to stamp out any opposition to abortion."I believe it wouldnt matter where we stoodit wouldnt matter how far they pushed the buffer zone," she told ADF International, a Christian legal advocacy group.NEW ONLINE 'MISINFORMATION' BILL SLAMMED AS 'BIGGEST ATTACK' ON FREEDOMS IN AUSTRALIA"It wouldnt matter where we stood 201 meters, or 500 meters away it seems the authorities would still try to crack down harshly and unfairly on individuals because the government simply disagree with their point of view. This is unjust of course, there should be laws against harassment, and we all condemn such behavior. But merely offering conversations near a hospital is not a crime."Dr Greg Irwin, a doctor at the QEUH, was picturedconfronting a group of protestersin February 2023, saying that they "cause emotional upset to patients, but also to staff members," per the BBC. Groups have been protesting outside the hospital for 10 years, leading to the passing of the Safe Access Zones Act.Mackay said patients and staff had told her that they still had to pass the protesters when attending the QEUH leading to distress."I think it's appropriate that we take those concerns seriously and the government take a look at whether an extension is appropriate or not," Mackay told the BBC.The act allows ministers to extend the size of a buffer zone if it is decided that the existing zone is not adequate, a Scottish government spokesperson told the outlet.Docherty isnt the first person to be arrested outside abortion facilities.For instance, Isabel Vaughan-Spruce, a prominent pro-life activist, was arrested twice in Birmingham for silently praying without any signs near an abortion facility within a buffer zone. She was arrested under a local law known as a Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO). She was later awarded $13,000 in compensation for wrongful arrests, according to Christian Today.The U.K. has drawn international attention for its alleged clampdown on free speech. A number of people have been investigated and arrested for social media posts.

Four first-of-a-kind lawsuits in Kansas were filed Monday aiming to hold porn websites accountable for violating state law, which mandates they use adequate age-verification systems. There are no federal laws requiring porn sites to verify a user's age.The suits, filed by the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) and a Kansas law firm on behalf of a minor child and the child's mother, are groundbreaking. It is apparently the first time a minor is seeking a legal remedy through the provisions of state age-verification laws for pornographic sites, according to NCOSE's general counsel.Kansas is among roughly 20 other states that have enacted age-verification laws for porn sites.Louisiana became the first in 2023. SOCIAL MEDIA GIANT HIT WITH SCATHING AD CAMPAIGN AMID ANGER OVER AI CHATBOTS SEXUALLY EXPLOITING KIDS "The Kansas law also allows for a private right of action, meaning that private individuals and organizations can bring cases against offending companies or websites," Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach told Fox News Digital. Kobach filed Kansas's first lawsuit in January against a porn site over a lack of age-verification mechanisms, a case that is ongoing."I think the combination of my office's first action followed by this private action shows that the law is operating as the legislature intended," Kobach said.NCOSE sued on behalf of a minor child, whose mother took numerous measures to ensure her 14-year-old child would not be exposed to pornographic websites but later learned her child was using an old laptop to access the sites. Online algorithms and content-curation processes from these sites' parent companies, or from contractors working for the sites, drove the teenager to at least two of the sites, according to the initial complaints filed with NCOSE.According to NCOSE, pornography is harmful to children because it disrupts the natural formation of children's sexual functions and maturation. Studies have also shown links between pornography and sexual violence and a litany of other health and well-being issues.GOP LAWMAKERS TARGET ONLINE PORNOGRAPHY, PROPOSE INTERSTATE BAN ON OBSCENE CONTENT"The parents in this instance thought they did everything right," NCOSE General Counsel Benjamin Bull said. "It's not enough just to try to prevent children from gaining access. It's just a question of when children will gain access."They'll find a way. It'll either be the kid next door with a kid in school, or an old, you know, thrown-away computer up in the closet some place. And, so, unless these online platforms actually install age verification, this boy's what's happened to him and what's happened to hundreds of thousands of others is just going to continue and get worse."According to the lawsuits filed Monday on behalf of the 14-year-old, at least one of the four pornographic sites being sued, Chaturbate, ostensibly has an age-verification mechanism, but it can be easily manipulated, and that does not satisfy Kansas' law.Multi Media LLC, Chaturbate's parent company, insisted to Fox News Digital the site "is fully compliant" with Kansas law, calling the lawsuit against it "completely baseless."PORN CASE IN THE SUPREME COURT THIS WEEK IS ABOUT PROTECTING CHILDREN, SAYS REPUBLICAN AG"As we explained in great detail to the plaintiffs counsel back in November,the company thoroughly investigated the claim and found the individual was never able to view any explicit content on the company's platform. The platform's ID verification age gate functioned exactly as expected, and the individual's attempts to view adult content without first proving he was an adult were entirely thwarted," a company spokesperson for Multi Media LLC told Fox News Digital."The company takes very seriously its responsibility to ensure that the platform only publishes material created and viewed by consenting adults," the spokesperson added. "Since the law went into effect, the company has displayed an 'age gate' page to any visitor who arrives on the site from an IP address that is geolocated in Kansas and who has not previously been verified as an adult, by requiring the individual to provide a government issued photo ID."The spokesperson added that Multi Media LLC intends "to seek sanctions" against the plaintiff over its "frivolous complaint," noting that when the company was first contacted about the allegations by the plaintiff in November, Multi Media LLC explained why suing it was baseless.But AG Kobach said the lawsuit brought by the mother and son, along with another unidentified "friend" of the family, shows state law is doing its job."I think the really important point, at least from my perspective, is that laws are working, and companies are being taken to task for marketing this material in a way that minors can get it when there are now technologies out there to prevent that from happening," Kobach told Fox News Digital.The 14-year-old and his mother, with the help of NCOSE and others, are seeking statutory damages of no less than $50,000 per violation in each of their four lawsuits. They are also seeking actual damages, attorney fees and any "further relief" that the court considers fair.

Former first lady Michelle Obama expressed the importance of parents "extending the leash" by letting kids take risks and fail.In the latest episode of her "IMO" podcast on Wednesday, Obama spoke about wanting her daughters to have confidence and independence while acknowledging that they can only learn those traits through trial and error."I think a lot of parents are afraid of watching that failure," she said. "It is the hardest thing to do to watch your kids walk into a wall that you knew was there. And you told them not to walk into it. Until they hit it and get a lump on their head, they just wont learn it. Thats a painful thing for us."MICHELLE OBAMA SAYS SHE 'GREW UP GRATEFUL,' BUT KIDS TODAY ARE LESS SOStill, she added, "If you keep your kids from that experience, a bump on the head, youre robbing them of their own competency. They need to know that you can bump your head, and you can figure it out. Go to the doctor. Put some ice on it. Dont do it again. Lets talk about it after the fact. But as you get older, I shouldnt have to walk you through everything. I think its a constant exercise of extending the leash, always err on the side of making it longer."Obama said she believed some parents hold onto their kids too long despite their "ultimate job" being to teach them resilience.She advised parents to start out when their kids are young with simple things such as going to school by themselves."Take some risks because you can land softly here," she remarked.CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTUREDuring an episode of her podcast last week, Obama also warned parents against being too concerned with being their kids friends.CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP"So many people are trying to be their kids friends, and they think that that makes you closer," Obama said. "But let me tell you, I was not my children's friend. I love them deeply. There was respect. And, you know, for those of you trying to be friends with your kids, our kids love us just as much as adults. In fact, the relationship, I think, is even closer because now theyve earned my friendship. Now we can be friends. Now, maybe you know something."

A Reddit drama is lighting up social media as a mom of a newborn says she's "going crazy" over her husband's choices and their current family challenges, with a clinical psychologist contacted for insight on the dilemma."Gave birth six weeks ago and its been rough," wrote the mom in a Reddit post."Recovering from emergency C-section, plus they think I may have a liver pancreas issue as I keep being unwell plus my mental health took a dive, let alone newborn care!"MAN DISGUSTED AT FOOD FROM GIRLFRIEND'S CULTURE TAKES HEAT ON SOCIAL MEDIAShe continued, "My newborn is screaming anything from 2-4 hours every night. Trying everything to soothe and remedy her, as [it's] most likely colic. So far, no meds or methods have changed her behavior," the mom added."We also have a 6-year-old who has very different needs. While the 6-week-old screams, the 6-year-old needs a bath, a bedtime story, etc."The mother said the couple have been "tag teaming this."They've been having one parent tend to one child "to make sure both are OK," she wrote."But its still been unbelievably hard on all of us."Now comes an invitation and a husband's choices that sparked debate."His guy friends invited him to a BBQ tonight and it would literally be him leaving just as [our] 6-week-old kicks off," the mom wrote."So I said, Please dont go. I need help at that time. Keeping in mind his friends meet regularly and its not like if he doesnt do it today, thats it for a year," she added.PICKY EATER WITH FOOD ALLERGIES IS TOLD SHE'S CHILDISH AND 'NEEDS TO GET OVER THIS'The husband replied, "Babies cry, just cope, I'm going," the young mother wrote.She said she "tried to point out that I know they cry, but its not about coping, and I felt it was really selfish that he was choosing to pick his friends over his family. I even said if it was any other time I wouldnt have a problem with it."Her husband, she said, has "gone back to work, and Im coping with that it's just literally that time of night thats tricky."But "he kept saying that I was being controlling by not letting him see his friends. It turned into a really bad moment for us where I was devastated to be called controlling. I really dont think thats what Im trying to do and that he just couldnt see it from my point of view."The mom said that the next day, her husband apologized.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTERHe said "he was completely wrong and [he] could see how bad things would be if he went and said he wouldnt go."However, she added, "fast forward to today where he tells me hes going and if I cant cope, hell take the baby and drop her at his [mom's] to look after."The problem, the young mother wrote, is that his mother "isnt close by, doesnt know all the things we are trying colic-wise, like the meds, etc., and would have to deal with a screaming baby. Also, my baby doesnt know her and is only 6 weeks, so all round, not a good solution."She said that her husband "also knows things are a bit tricky between me and his mom, so I feel like this was a bit manipulative on his part. . . . He knows Id never pick his mom as an option but can now say hes found a solution where he can go."The at-her-wit's-end young mother wrote, "I feel like Im going crazy here. I just want some support from my partner at the time of the day its most difficult with our baby!"Fox News Digital reached out a California-based clinical psychologist for insight as other users on Reddit shared their own reactions and comments.One person in a top-rated comment wrote, "'You are welcome to attend your BBQ tonight. Tomorrow night, you will stay home with baby and child while I go out and have my break.' - I can guarantee he won't agree to that," the user added."The comment babies cry, just cope would have him sleeping in his mothers house if he was my husband," said another person.Said yet another user on the platform, "Sorry, but your husband is being completely unreasonable. We have 2 kids We have an agreement that if either of us goes out, it's after 7 p.m. once both are in bed. Which means we both still get a social life without leaving the other in chaos."For more Lifestyle articles, visit foxnews.com/lifestyleThe same person added, "It's not much to ask him to make a few sacrifices Especially as he can still go out a bit later."Another commenter was far more worked up about the situation. "This is so infuriating to read. Im so sorry he is treating you like this after everything youve been through.""If I had a partner who carried my child for 9 months, had major abdominal surgery and suffered ongoing health issues to ensure the safe delivery of my child Id be worshipping the ground they walked on for the rest of my life."The same person added, "Hes being incredibly selfish, invalidating your feelings and theres just no excuse for this other than pure selfishness."Still another person shared a more nuanced reaction."I can see it's hard on dads, too, and I don't blame him for wanting a break. But that's exactly the reason why he needs to stay. He can't expect you to go through that alone! He can look for other moments to recharge and meet his mates, but not during rush hour."

Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, is once again calling on his colleagues in the House to impeach President Donald Trump, saying the president has "devolved American democracy into authoritarianism.""I pen this communique with a heavy heart, driven by a conscience that will not allow me to ignore my well-founded, strong pre-election condemnation of Donald John Trump as a threat to American democracy that has now become our reality," Green wrote in a letter urging his colleagues to impeach the president.Green argues that, contrary to what many believe, there does not need to be a constitutional crisis in order to impeach a president.HOUSE DEMOCRAT ANNOUNCES ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST TRUMPOn Thursday, he filed H. Res. 415, "Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, of high crimes and misdemeanors."In the articles of impeachment, Green claims that Trump has engaged in authoritarian rule, violated due process, denigrated federal judges and ignored court orders, including ones from the Supreme Court. He also claims that Trump condoned "untruthful statements" against the Courts opinion regarding the deportation of accused MS-13 member Kilmar Abrego Garcia.TOP HOUSE DEMS SAY THEY'LL JOIN GOP TO QUASH TRUMP IMPEACHMENT EFFORT"An authoritarian does not have to commit a codified statutory offense to be impeached. The constitutional law that authoritarian President Trump would have Congress use to impeach a federal judge for ruling against him (Article II, Section 4 of the United States Constitution) is the same law that has been used, and can be used, to impeach him again for making his threats to democracy a reality," Green wrote in the articles of impeachment, He then vowed to "use that law again."Green is the second member of Congress to issue articles of impeachment against Trump in the presidents second term. Rep. Shri Thanedar, D-Mich., also called for Trumps impeachment, but he later withdrew the bill after getting backlash from party leadership. Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., reportedly called the bill "idiotic," according to Axios. However, Nadler was previously a sponsor of the measure.In his letter, Green made it clear that he was not afraid to "stand alone" against Trump."I encourage all members to vote with their conscience. As for me, I stand where I have stood on impeachment, which is a question of conscience, even when the odds are against me it is better for me to stand alone than not stand at all it wont be the first time," Green wrote.Green has never been silent about his opposition to Trump, even making multiple attempts to impeach the president during his first term. In March 2025, he was removed from Trumps address to a joint session of Congress after he heckled the president. He was eventually censured for the protest.