The Denver Nuggets beat the Oklahoma City Thunder 119-107 in Game 6 of the Western Conference Semifinals. Colin Cowherd discusses the highly entertaining series and how theres a discrepancy between the regular season and post season.

A report came out saying that Caleb Williams didnt want to get drafted by the Chicago Bears. Colin Cowherd discusses how rookie QBs who struggled in their first season rebound in season 2, and how Caleb Williams can succeed with the Bears.

Joseph Paris, who was the late singer's hairdresser, recalled how the summer of 1969 sparked fear in Los Angeles in his memoir, "Hairman of the Board."

'Outnumbered' panelists discuss singer-songwriter Bruce Springsteen's criticism of the trump administration during a concert Wednesday and the response from President Donald Trump.

The 'Outnumbered' panel discusses the fallout from former FBI director James Comey's social media post and why he is now under investigation for the 'threat.'

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett sparred with U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer Thursday, pressing him on whether the Trump administration would follow federal court precedent. The exchange quickly became one of the days most talked-about moments and could reignite criticism of Barrett from Trump allies.The back-and-forth took place Thursday during oral arguments in a case related to President Donald Trump's effort to end birthright citizenship with a specific focus on whether lower courts should be able to block executive actions from taking effect nationwide.Justice Barrett, a Trump appointee, grilled Sauer about the administration's stance toward lower court rulings, which followed similar lines of inquiry from her colleagues on the bench."I want to ask you about a potential tension," she began, before stopping to correct herself. "Well, no, not a potential tension, anactual tension that I see in answers that you gave to Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Kagan."JUSTICE KAGAN SNAPS AT TRUMP LAWYER IN MAJOR CASE: 'EVERY COURT HAS RULED AGAINST YOU'Barrett then asked Sauer if the Trump administration "wanted to reserve its right to maybe not follow a Second Circuit precedent, say, in New York, because you might disagree with its opinion?""You resisted Justice Kagan when she asked you whether the government would obey" such a precedent, she said.Sauer responded, "Our general practice is to respect those precedents. But there are circumstances when it is not a categorical practice, and that is not "Barrett interrupted, asking if that is the Trump administrations practice or "the long-standing practice of the federal government?"Sauer replied that it is "the long-standing policy of the Department of Justice.""Really?" she asked.SUPREME COURT TAKES ON BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP: JUSTICES SEEMINGLY SPLIT ON LOWER COURT POWERS"Yes, as it was phrased to me, we generally respect circuit precedent, but not necessarily in every case," Sauer said. "Some examples might be a situation where we are litigating to get that circuit precedent overruled and so on," he added later."That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about this week," Barrett stressed, pointing to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling that Trump's birthright citizenship order is unconstitutional."And what do you do the next day, or the next week?" she asked."Generally, we follow this," Sauer said, which provoked a somewhat incredulous response from the justice."So, you're still saying generally?" she asked him. "And you still think that it's generally the long-standing policy of the federal government to take that approach?"The remarks sparked divided political reactions on social media, with Democratic strategist Max Burns noting, "Trump Solicitor General D. John Sauer tells Justice Amy Coney Barrett that Trump 'generally' tries to respect federal court decisions but he has the 'right' to disregard legal opinions he personally disagrees with. Coney Barrett seems to be in disbelief.""John Sauer just said the quiet part out loud: unless the Supreme Court tells them directly, Trumps team might ignore lower court rulings," said Seth Taylor, a 2024 DNC delegate. "Thats not governance thats constitutional brinksmanship.""Amy Coney Barrett (ACB) is proving once again she may the the worst SCOTUS pick ever by a Republican," conservative commentator and podcast host Cash Loren said on social media."She has a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court. Yet you can hear her disdain for the Trump administration."100 DAYS OF INJUNCTIONS, TRIALS AND 'TEFLON DON': TRUMP SECOND TERM MEETS ITS BIGGEST TESTS IN COURTEarlier this year, Barrett sided with three of the Supreme Court's liberal justices and Chief Justice John Roberts in rejecting, 5-4, the Trump administration's request to block billions in USAID money for previously completed projects.The decision sparkedfierce criticism from Trump supporters, who have attempted to label Justice Barrett an "activist" justice and someone who has been insufficiently loyal to the president who tapped her for the high court.Others have pointed out her track record as a reliably conservative voter and the fact the court has lifetime appointments to allow justices to ostensibly act without undue political interference.Trump later said he had no knowledge of the attacks against her, telling reporters, "Shes a very good woman.""Shes very smart, and I dont know about people attacking her. I really dont know." Trump added.The court ruling could come in a matter of days or weeks. But it will likely hinge closely on the votes of two Trump appointees, Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Barrett, George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley told Fox News Friday.Overall, he said of the hearing, "it got pretty sporty in there.""There were some lively moments, at least lively for the Supreme Court," he said, before noting the justices to watch are Gorsuch and Barrett."Justice Barrett is probably the greatest concern right now for the Trump administration," Turley said.

Following last weeks air traffic control crisis, health officials are now reporting a potential measles outbreak at New Jerseys Newark Airport.Travelers were warned of possible measles exposure after a case was confirmed in an individual who traveled through the airport on May 12.MEASLES SCARE AT MAJOR AIRPORT: WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT POTENTIAL EXPOSUREThe New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) released a notice on Thursday addressing the situation, detailing that the newly identified measles case was a non-New Jersey resident who visited the state while infectious.The department noted the following times and locations where exposure could have potentially occurred.Infected individuals could potentially see symptoms develop as late as June 2.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTERThe NJDOH urged parents and caregivers to be aware of symptoms and to stay up to date with the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination to prevent the "highly contagious virus" from spreading.If symptoms arise or exposure is confirmed, NJDOH recommends that individuals contact their healthcare provider before showing up to a medical office or emergency department.As of May 15, the health department confirmed that no additional associated cases have been identified in New Jersey.For more Health articles, visitwww.foxnews.com/healthMeasles symptoms can include high fever; cough; runny nose; red, watery eyes; and a rash that first appears on the face and spreads down the body.The virus is transmitted through particles from coughing or sneezing, and can remain in the air for up to two hours after an infected person has departed the area.The NJDOH stressed that the most effective way to prevent measles is to receive two doses of the MMR vaccine, as the highest-risk group includes unvaccinated and partially vaccinated individuals.The department encourages all individuals to get vaccinated before traveling internationally.One dose can be given to infants aged six to 11 months before travel. Two more doses can be administered after their first birthday, according to officials.

With the Supreme Court hearing its first case Thursday relating to nationwide injunctions federal district court judges issuing rulings that affect the entire country several proponents of a plan to end the practice are speaking out.Senate Judiciary Committee member John Kennedy, R-La., said it appears to be a case of the "tail wag[ging] the dog," in that it is the judiciarys job to adjudicate the law, not create it."When Congress makes a law, the federal judges are supposed to follow it. When the president exercises his power under Article II, judges are supposed to follow it, so long as it's lawful," Kennedy said."They can't just overturn it because they don't agree with it, and that's what a lot of these federal judges are doing."SEN JOHN KENNEDY: WHY SCOTUS SHOULD SEIZE OPPORTUNITY TO ELIMINATE UNIVERSAL INJUNCTIONSIn a Fox News Opinion piece this week, Kennedy noted "universal injunctions" have been around since the 1960s, when judges began enjoining the government from enforcing certain policies against "anyone, anywhere" adding they let a judge say "sayonara" to laws, regulations or even whims of a president they dont like.Kennedy noted that there have only been 27 such injunctions from JFK through Y2K.A review showed none was lodged against Presidents George H.W. Bush or Bill Clinton but began to creep in during the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations.With nearly 100 rulings against President Donald Trump in his one-and-an-eighth terms, Kennedy said some judges seem to want to "rewrite the Constitution every other Thursday, to advance some social or economic agenda that they can't get by the voters: But the law is the law.""And a universal injunction was created out of whole cloth. There's no statutory basis for a universal injunction," the Louisianan said, echoing the analysis in his op-ed.Given his penchant for often colorful and probing questions of judiciary appointees, Kennedy was also asked how an unfavorable ruling from the Supreme Court could affect nominee choices and further politicize the process."All the nominees in front of us are going to be asked about universal injunctions, I can tell you. And if they try to dodge and bob and weave and run like a hound on the treeline, when it's my turn to question them I'm not going to let them. I'm not asking how they would rule in a particular case, but I want to know what they think the legal basis is for a universal injunction, because there is none: I want to hear what they had to say."Sen. Tommy Tuberville who joined Kennedy and others in supporting Iowa Sen. Charles Grassleys Judicial Relief Clarification Act (JCRA) to end the practice said such "woke" judges should consider retiring their robes.SENATOR WARNS OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL OVERREACH AHEAD OF SCOTUS SHOWDOWN"President Trump campaigned on a promise to deport dangerous criminals and won in a landslide. In just four months, he has already delivered the most secure border in American history," Tuberville told Fox News Digital."Unfortunately, we have radical left judges who are allowing their personal beliefs to supersede the will of 77 million Americans who voted for President Trump and his agenda," the former Auburn football legend added."If a judge wants to make political decisions, they should run for office. Otherwise, they should focus on upholding the Constitution and enforcing the law."Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, also said he supports the JCRA, calling nationwide injunctions "a real problem.""[A] single federal judge can essentially stop a popularly elected president dead in his tracks by a temporary restraining order, which doesn't just deal with the parties in front of the judge, but literally the whole nation.""If the Supreme Court doesn't do it in the context of this birthright citizenship case, then Congress needs to continue to pursue this via Senator Grassleys bill and other means."CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPWhile the case argued Thursday involves an injunction with regard to the interpretation of birthright citizenship in the law, Cornyn said that the court will determine the scope of that particular order, but that the idea of nationwide injunctions is being abused.For his part, Grassley previously told Fox News Digital that such injunctions "are an unconstitutional abuse of judicial power."

JERUSALEMThe scandal-plagued prosecutor for the International Criminal Court (ICC) has been compelled to step down, pending the outcome of an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct, the court announced Friday. Khan has categorically denied the allegations against him.Fox News Digital sent detailed press queries to the ICC and embattled prosecutor Karim Khanon Thursday, asking if the world court planned to oust him and whether he would resign.The Associated Press reported the court said in a statement that Khan on Friday communicated his decision to take leave until the end of an external investigation that will be carried by the Office of Internal Oversight Services, the U.N. internal watchdog.That same report said that women's rights groups welcomed the move, who had called for him to step down after the allegations emerged last year, but Khan initially resisted leaving.ICC REQUESTS ARREST WARRANTS FOR NETANYAHU, HAMAS LEADERS OVER WAR CRIMESLast year, an Associated Press investigation found that two court employees in whom the alleged victim confided came forward with the accusation in May. That was a few weeks before Khan sought arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu, his former Defense Minister, Yoav Gallant, and three Hamas leaders on war crimes charges.Israel has been waging an existential war against the U.S.-designated terrorist movement, Hamas, since it invaded the Jewish state on October 7, 2023 and slaughtered more than 1,200 people, including American citizens.Eugene Kontorovich, alegal expert and senior fellow atthe Heritage Foundations Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, told Fox News Digital, "Removing Khan is not enough. The entire tribunal, including his prosecutorial team and judges, enabled his blood libel. The scandal points to the inherent defects of the institution - a total lack of accountability."The Associated Press reported that two co-workers in whom the woman confided at theICCs headquarters at The Haguereported Khans alleged misconduct in May to the courts independent watchdog, which says it interviewed the woman and ended its inquiry after five days when she opted against filing a formal complaint. Khan himself wasn't questioned at the time.While the courts watchdog could not determine wrongdoing, it nonetheless urged Khan in a memo to minimize contact with the woman to protect the rights of all involved and safeguard the courts integrity.Khan has been facing increasing pressure on multiple fronts. U.S. President Donald Trump filed sanctions against Khan in February in relation to his Israel warrants. The sanctions are hampering work on a broad array of investigations at the court.ICC REJECTS ISRAELI APPEALS, ISSUES ARREST WARRANTS FOR BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, YOAV GALLANTThe Wall Street Journal reported Khans decision to prosecute Netanyahu and the countrys former Defense Minister raised"questions about whether Khan was aiming to protect himself from the sexual-assault allegations. The day before announcing the warrant application, Khan abruptly canceled a trip to Israel and Gaza that he had previously said was important to make his decision."The Wall Street Journal reported the ICC employees graphic account of Khanallegedly raping the woman and sexually molesting her.Lawyers for Khan from the firm, Carter-Ruck Solicitors, told Fox News Digital on Friday that, "Our client does wish to make clear, however, that it is categorically untrue that he has engaged in sexual misconduct of any kind."Khans lawyers continued, "Our client is cooperating fully and transparently with the investigation by the U.N. Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) in relation to allegations that have been raised against him."With respect to information that Khan exploited the ICC to save his own skin by charging Israeli leaders,Carter-Ruck Solicitors said "The decision to announce that arrest warrants for individuals including Mr. Netanyahu, Mr. Gallant and leaders of Hamas, our client also wishes to make clear that the fact that ICC Judges approved the applications for those warrants underscores that the evidence on which they were based met the rigorous legal threshold required under the Rome Statute.Suggestions that the Prosecutors applications were linked to, or precipitated by, unrelated allegations of misconduct are totally false."HOUSE PASSES BILL THAT WOULD SANCTION INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT FOR TRYING TO ARREST NETANYAHUKontorovich said about the ICC case against Israeli leaders: "This fundamentally undermines the integrity of the case, and in a normal judicial system, would lead not just to these charges being thrown out, but cast doubt on all his prior cases."He continued that "Given that the ICC has only managed to secure final convictions against six people for atrocity crimes in its quarter-century of existence, a massive scandal of prosecutorial misconduct should be grounds for shutting down the institution, not just removing the prosecutor."When asked if the ICC plans to rescind the arrest warrants against the Israeli leaders, Fadi El-Abdallah, the spokesman for the ICC, told Fox News Digital that "As there is a pending request, I cant offer comment or speculation on its outcome."El-Abdallah referred Fox News Digital to Khans media team regarding questions related to his alleged sexual misconduct and allegations he damaged the integrity of the world court.Israel asked the ICC to withdraw the arrest warrants in early May.Fox News Digital previously reported the British chief prosecutor, Khan, published an academic essay in 2013 that suggested his own current effort to arrest Netanyahu would be a travesty of justice because the court cannot provide due process to defendants."Make no mistake: the problem is bigger than Khan. Theyre throwing him under the bus to protect the institution and salvage their campaign against Israel. But the rot runs deep. This was never about justice, it was always about a political agenda," Hillel Neuer, a lawyer and UN Watch Executive Director, told Fox News Digital.A spokesperson for the United Nations told Fox News Digital that it does not comment on the ICC because it is an independent judicial body.The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Nearly a dozen inmates escaped from a New Orleans jail on Friday morning, and one has been apprehended, according to authorities.Many of the inmates are considered violent offenders, with some facing charges including murder.New Orleans Police Department Superintendent Anne Kirkpatrick said her agency was notified at 10:30 a.m. that there were 11 escapees from the sheriff's prison.Kirkpatrick said when notified, she immediately offered any and all resources to the sheriff."This is an urgent and a serious situation," she said during a news conference. "Please be mindful. We know or have asked for pictures of these escapees from the sheriff's office. We do also want to make I appeal to the public that if you see something, and you just think this is not right, don't hesitate. Call 911."The Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office (OPSO) said one inmate charged with second-degree murder, Kendell Myles, is back in custody and being re-booked at the facility for a new charge of simple escape.OPSO deputies found him hiding beneath a car in the Hotel Monteleone parking garage, according to officials.Myles was then taken back to the jail by Louisiana State Police."The remaining individuals are still being actively pursued, and our deputies, in collaboration with local and state law enforcement, are working tirelessly to locate and return them to custody," according to the sheriff's office.Anyone found to be aiding an escapee will be charged as an accomplice, according to authorities.A violent offender warrant squad is actively searching for the escapees along with the FBI and U.S. Marshals.The inmates include:In a statement posted to X, Attorney General Liz Murrill said "someone clearly dropped the ball and there's no excuse for this.""Im in communication with Troop NOLA and @LAStatePolice Superintendent Colonel Hodges. Its all hands on deck," Murrill wrote in the post. "The first priority in any escape must be the immediate capture of the inmates and coordination with state and local law enforcement but that effort cannot come at the expense of timely notification to the public, which is also critical to keeping communities safe. My office will do whatever it takes to determine how this happened and make sure that it wont happen again."She added she is calling for a full investigation."This is beyond unacceptable, and once these offenders are back in custody, there must be real accountability," Murrill wrote.Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.This is a developing story. Check back for updates.