Atlanta Dream center Brittney Griner was irate at WNBA officials on Saturday night and let them know about it as the team handed the Dallas Wings their fourth straight defeat.Griner was about to talk to CBS Sports for a halftime interview when the officials walked behind her. She turned around and complained about how she was being fouled during the contest. She was then heard yelling an expletive as the officials went back to the locker room.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM"Be f---ing better," she said.WARNING: EXPLICIT LANGUAGEGriner apologized to those watching at home for her profane outburst.She finished with 15 points and eight rebounds as the Dream won the game, 83-75. Allisha Gray led the game with 27 points, six assists and five rebounds.CAITLIN CLARK FURIOUS WITH WNBA REFS AFTER THEY FAILED TO WHISTLE A FOUL BY NATASHA CLOUD FOR HARD CONTACTGriner joined the Dream in the offseason after she spent the first 12 seasons of her career with the Phoenix Mercury. She was a part of a harrowing situation in 2022 when she was arrested in Russia on drug charges and held there until she was a part of a prisoner swap for Viktor Bout, known as "The Merchant of Death."She played two more seasons in Phoenix after she returned home. A two-time WNBA Defensive Player of the Year, she averaged 17.7 points and 7.4 rebounds during her time with the Mercury.In four games in Atlanta this season, she has averaged 14.8 points and 7.8 rebounds per game.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Fingerprint sensors have been around for quite some time, and theyve become a standard feature in most smartphones. Apple introduced Touch ID on the iPhone 5s in 2013. Since then, it has appeared on 12 major iPhone models (and some iPads as well).Though Apple removed it from most phones after the iPhone 8, its still found in the iPhone SE series. On the flip side, almost every Android phone on the market has a fingerprint scanner. But are fingerprint scanners impossible to bypass? Frank from Deerton, Michigan, asked a similar question that I want to highlight and address because it helps all of us:"Can a website be hacked/compromised with password and fingerprint protection (multiple verification)?"I get what youre saying, Frank. Youd think that since a fingerprint scanner literally requires your fingerprint, it couldnt be bypassed. But youd be wrong. While fingerprint scanners are generally more secure than facial recognition and passwords, theyre not foolproof. In fact, there are several ways bad actors can bypass them to steal your identity.Join The FREE CyberGuy Report: Get my expert tech tips, critical security alerts and exclusive deals plus instant access to myfree Ultimate Scam Survival Guide when you sign up!There are multiple ways hackers use to bypass fingerprint scanners. Below, I will discuss five of the more prominent methods.Hackers exploit the concept of "masterprints," which are fingerprints engineered to match multiple individuals' prints. Researchers atNYU Tandon developed "DeepMasterPrints" using machine learning to generate synthetic fingerprints that can deceive sensors by mimicking common fingerprint features. These artificial prints can match with a significant percentage of stored fingerprints, especially on devices with less stringent security settings.Another trick hackers use is making fake fingerprints. They can lift prints off things youve touched and then use stuff like fabric glue or even 3D printers to make molds. For example,researchers at Cisco Talos tried out a bunch of different ways to do this using 3D printing and tested them on phones like the iPhone 8 and Samsung S10; laptops like the Samsung Note 9, Lenovo Yoga and HP Pavilion X360; and even smart gadgets like padlocks.On average, the fake fingerprints worked about 80% of the time. They were able to fool the sensors at least once. Interestingly, they couldnt crack the biometric systems on Windows 10 devices, but they pointed out that doesnt necessarily mean those are more secure. It just means this particular method didnt work on them.19 BILLION PASSWORDS HAVE LEAKED ONLINE: HOW TO PROTECT YOURSELFAttackers have found a cheap way to break into smartphones by brute force fingerprint authentication. The method, called BrutePrint, lets attackers get around the usual limits that stop too many failed fingerprint attempts. It works by taking advantage of two previously unknown flaws in the fingerprint system. These flaws, named Cancel-After-Match-Fail (CAMF) and Match-After-Lock (MAL), exist because of weak protection for fingerprint data on a part of the hardware called the Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI).Basically, BrutePrint uses a hardware-based man-in-the-middle attack to hijack fingerprint data. It sits between the fingerprint sensor and the phones secure area (called the Trusted Execution Environment) and tries as many fingerprint images as needed until it finds a match. The relieving part is that the attacker needs to have physical access to the phone for this method to work.PrintListener is a side-channel attack that captures the sound of a finger swiping on a screen to extract fingerprint features. It might sound like something out of a sci-fi movie, but researchers have already built a proof of concept. By analyzing the friction sounds, attackers can reconstruct fingerprint patterns, potentially enhancing the effectiveness of masterprint attacks.Some devices store fingerprint data without adequate encryption. If attackers gain access to this unprotected data, they can replicate fingerprints to bypass authentication. For example, in 2024, a misconfigured server exposed nearly 500 GB of sensitive biometric data, including fingerprints, facial scans and personal details of law enforcement applicants.TOP 20 APPS TRACKING YOU EVERY DAYFingerprint scanners make it easy and fairly secure to unlock your devices. Since everyone has unique fingerprints, you dont need to remember complicated passwords. Just a quick touch and you are in. Most modern devices store your fingerprint data in secure parts of the system, and they use things like liveness detection to make sure someone is not trying to trick the scanner with a fake finger.Still, no security method is perfect. Skilled attackers have found ways to get past fingerprint scanners using high-resolution photos or 3D-printed fingers or by taking advantage of flaws in how the scanner communicates with the rest of the device. The risk really depends on how well the scanner is designed and how much effort someone puts into breaking it. For most people, fingerprint authentication is quick, easy and secure enough. However, if you are dealing with very sensitive information, relying only on biometrics might not be the best idea.HOW TO REMOVE YOUR PERSONAL INFO FROM PEOPLE SEARCH SITES10 SIMPLE STEPS TO IMPROVE YOUR SMARTPHONES SECURITY AND PRIVACYSafeguard your biometric identity with these essential security measures.1. Choose trusted phone brands:If you're buying a phone, stick with well-known brands like Apple, Samsung or Google. These companies take extra steps to protect your fingerprint data by storing it in secure areas of the phone that are harder to access. Cheaper or lesser-known brands may not have these protections, which makes it easier for attackers to steal your data.2. Keep your phone updated:Phone updates are not just about new features. They fix security problems that hackers might use to break into your device. If your phone asks you to install an update, do it. Most phones also let you turn on automatic updates, so you dont have to worry about remembering. Keeping your software updated is one of the easiest and most important ways to stay protected.3. Use strong antivirus software: Install strong antivirus software to detect malware that could compromise biometric data storage.Strong antivirus software offers real-time threat detection, anti-phishing and privacy features to block unauthorized access to fingerprint data. The best way to safeguard yourself from malicious links that install malware, potentially accessing your private information, is to have strong antivirus software installed on all your devices. This protection can also alert you to phishing emails and ransomware scams, keeping your personal information and digital assets safe.Get my picks for the best 2025 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android and iOS devices.WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)?4. Dont rely only on your fingerprint:Using a fingerprint to unlock your phone is convenient, but it shouldnt be your only line of defense, especially for sensitive apps like banking or email. Always set up a PIN, password or pattern as a backup on youriPhone andAndroid. This way, even if someone manages to copy your fingerprint, they still need another piece of information to get in.5. Be careful about who handles your phone:If someone else uses your phone, especially a stranger or someone you dont know well, they might be able to copy your fingerprint from the screen. Its rare, but it happens. To reduce this risk, avoid handing your phone to people unnecessarily and wipe your screen occasionally to remove any clear fingerprints.6. Only use fingerprint login with trusted apps:Not every app that asks for your fingerprint is trustworthy. Its safest to use fingerprint login only with apps from known and reliable companies, like your bank, phone manufacturer or email provider. If an unfamiliar app asks for fingerprint access, its better to skip it and use your password instead.7. Consider using a personal data removal service: Even fingerprint scanners can be bypassed, and large amounts of personal and biometric data have been exposed in breaches. Using a personal data removal service helps reduce your risk by removing your sensitive information from public databases and data broker sites, making it harder for hackers to piece together details that could be used to steal your identity.Check out my top picks for data removal services here.Get afree scanto find out if your personal information is already out on the web.WHAT HACKERS CAN LEARN ABOUT YOU FROM A DATA BROKER FILEPasswords are generally easier to hack than biometric data like fingerprints or facial recognition. However, the key difference is that passwords can be changed if theyre compromised. Your biometrics cannot. Most modern devices allow both options, and biometrics can offer an extra layer of security by making it harder for someone else to access your phone or apps. They're also fast and convenient, since you dont need to remember or type anything. That said, in most cases, your device still falls back on a password or PIN when biometric identification doesnt work, so both systems often go hand in hand.With the increasing sophistication of methods to bypass fingerprint security, what should companies be doing to stay ahead of these threats and better protect user data? Let us know by writing us atCyberguy.com/ContactFor more of my tech tips and security alerts, subscribe to my free CyberGuy Report Newsletter by heading toCyberguy.com/NewsletterAsk Kurt a question or let us know what stories you'd like us to coverFollow Kurt on his social channelsAnswers to the most asked CyberGuy questions:New from Kurt:Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

The email sits in Kyles inbox: "Please submit your vacation plans for the year." He glances at his project timeline, then at the family photo his kids beaming from last summer's brief weekend at the lake. His calendar is packed with deadlines stretching into next quarter. There's never a "good" time, he thinks, moving the email to his "Later" folder for the third time this month.Like Kyle, millions of Americans find themselves in this cycle postponing vacations and stockpiling unused leave days, convinced next month will be less busy. Each year, workers leave billions of dollars worth of paid time off (PTO) unused, effectively gifting these earned benefits back to their employers. But this isn't just about unused benefits it's about how humans function at their best.Employees often blame a toxic work culture, demands for overwork, or unsupportive bosses as reasons why they dont take available leave. But whether parental leave, sick leave, or general PTO, employer support for employee time off exist for a reason because employees and the companies they work for are all better off when people can take a break from work. Heres why.IVANKA TRUMP MAKES COST RICA SPLASH VACATIONING WITH EXTENDED FAMILY FOR SPRING BREAKFirst, its about health. Chronic stress and burnout have measurable negative impacts on physical and mental health, including risks of cardiovascular issues, anxiety, and depression. This is especially true for long periods of uninterrupted work without proper breaks. Taking vacation time allows the body and mind to repair and reset.This also has direct effects on productivity. While it may seem counterintuitive, research has found that taking time off actually improves workplace performance. This is in part because the human brain requires periods of rest to maintain peak cognitive function. This is especially relevant for knowledge workers who need focus, or service workers who need regulation. Studies show that after a vacation, employees return with enhanced creativity, better problem-solving abilities, and renewed energy.Such breaks are also helpful for innovation and creativity. Distance from daily and maybe mundane work routines creates mental space for new perspectives and ideas. Breakthrough insights often erupt during or after vacation time, when minds are free to wander and make novel connections. When a break is spent in nature, that can be all the more inspiring. So taking true breaks can be considered especially important for jobs which rely on stellar innovation and creativity.Its not just about whether or not to take that vacation its also about who does it. Peer pressure matters, but managers and leaders especially set the tone at the top. When employees, especially leaders, don't take vacation time, it creates an unhealthy workplace culture which normalizes overwork. By taking your vacation, you help establish healthy boundaries and give permission for others to do the same. This is not only helpful for setting the standards for your current employees, but also showcasing a culture that will make other talented individuals want to work with and for you as no one wants to work at the place where it feels expected to never take time off.Another concern of managers is how leave policies look on paper, as compared to how they are actually implemented. Results from my own research interviewing working mothers discovered a theme of resentment against companies that espoused having family-friendly workplaces with paid leave, that was then felt as deeply hypocritical when individual managers werent supportive of their folks taking such leave. This is when a policy designed to help or support employees can end up not providing that support there is a gap between what is written and what is unwritten. This means that employers often feel good about having the policies on paper, and either arent aware or dont care if employees ever actually use them. The box is checked but is the support actually delivered? HR professionals call this the "implementation gap," and it can have deeply negative effects on employee commitment and identification with their employer.Beyond work, relationships with family and friends require quality time to nurture and maintain. Vacation allows for creating meaningful memories, strengthening bonds, and pursuing that ever-elusive balance between work and life responsibilities. Our connections with others provide the emotional support system that makes us more resilient at work. Without time devoted to those connections, that support is weakened.So dont be like Kyle and dont postpone your vacations until later take them now. Whether a day, week, or longer, take the time you need to replenish your energy, restore your well-being, and rejuvenate your relationships with important people in your life. Managers and leaders, make sure that your leave policies are well-communicated and well-executed. Set the standard with your own behavior as you personally and professionally benefit from taking that vacation. Your job will still be there when you get back stronger, more energized, and more resilient than before.

A great deal of mirth and ribbing has been directed at CNNs Jake Tapper in recent days over his co-authoring of a tell-all blockbuster book about how awful he and his colleagues are at their jobs.But last week, during one of his approximately 27 million TV appearances to hawk, "Original Sin," the book on the Biden administrations lies that he dashed off with Axios Alex Thompson as soon as the 2024 election was over, Tapper said something that was so close to really understanding his subject and his job that it almost hurt.'THE VIEW' MELTS DOWN OVER LATEST BIDEN BOOK, SLAMS CNN FOR 'HAWKING' ITAppearing on CBS News, Tapper said, "So, there were people reporting on what they saw. The conservative media was, to their credit, all over this. Now, they didn't have insider information, but they were just making sense of all the clips, and all of the weird moments, and off-putting moments."What Tapper misses here is that conservative media didnt get it right in regard to Joe Bidens obvious and abject unfitness for office in spiteof not having insider information, they got it right becausethey were not relying on insider information.In Tappers twisted view of journalism, and it is one widely shared, the evidence we see with our own eyes is not sufficient. Instead, it isnt news until some whistleblower spills the beans, which puts all the power in the hands of sources.Since the Watergate scandal of the 1970s, everything has to be a Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein-style scoop. A story isnt real without some turncoat in the administration, even though they, too, have agendas.Obviously, the big problem here is that all of Tapper and Thompsons sources spent years deceiving them and the American people, but now, suddenly, we are expected to believe everything these same serial liars say.Sorry. Not happening.Lets take the tempting tale being spun by Tapper and Thompson now that it was actually first son Hunter Biden who was running the show. It's delicious, maybe the crack-addled Burisma executive really is the smartest man Joe ever met. The artist behind the curtain.However, and call me a cynic if you will, this particular version of events just so happens to be the one that paints Tapper and Thompsons insider sources in the best possible light.Basically, what these insiders are saying is, "Man, we really tried to do the right thing, but that Hunter, he just blocked us at every chance, which is too bad because he has a pardon for anything he did with the autopen now, but what can you do?"And once again, Tapper and Thompson just eagerly write it all down as if they were standing atop Mt. Sinai taking dictation of the Ten Commandments from God.The bottom line is that even if you are a generous soul inclined to trust Tapper and Thompson, only a fool would trust their insider sources. So honestly, what is the point of even reading the book?This speaks to a much deeper problem with journalism which tends to frame all political coverage as a government that is lying and intrepid reporters sussing out the actual truth when that is almost never what actually happens.Instead, these journalists confuse sourcing with access, so all their "sources" are people advancing their agenda. Now, suddenly, the agenda is to pile on Biden and salvage our reputations (for media AND insiders).George Orwell said, "Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed: everything else is public relations."Tapper and Thompson have both been doing a lot of PR for Democrats for a very long time.CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINIONA source, especially an anonymous source, is almost by definition only telling a reporter something they want the reporter to print. It can sometimes be helpful, but it is never the whole story.The hilarious final twist in all of this is that in Donald Trump, we have a president who takes more questions than the average corporate call center and owns everything the press accuses him of from sending migrants to El Salvadoran jails to holding Crypto Balls at his resort. It's all just out in the open.The age of post-Watergate "gotcha" journalism has driven the industry off of a cliff. Nobody believes what journalists say because they are just mouthpieces for those in power.The primary job of the journalist isnt to pry out some hidden information being kept from people; They arent detectives. It is to accurately report on and analyze what we know is happening.In that regard, the coverage of Joe Bidens decline, his clear inability to serve, is arguably the worst journalism that ever been attempted. Tapper and Thompson couldnt see what was right in front of their face because they were convinced there had to be something deeper, something hidden.It is time to turn the page and get back to a journalism that deals in reality, not speculation. Until that happens, Americans have no reason to believe anything the Jake Tappers and Alex Thompsons of the world tell them.CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DAVID MARCUS

Members of former President Joe Biden's inner circle "weren't telling the truth" when describing him as "sharp," "focused" and "detail-oriented," Axios national political correspondent Alex Thompson said Sunday adding that the media fell short in challenging the narrative.The co-author of the new book "Original Sin," which details what many view as a calculated, years-long effort to conceal the former president's decline in the run-up to the 2024 election, joined "Fox News Sunday" to shed light on the inner workings of the Biden White House."They weren't telling the truth, and I think the book really conclusively shows what was going on behind the scenes," he said, weighing in on a series of statements from top Biden officials including then-Homeland Security Sec. Alejandro Mayorkas, former press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and former Chief of Staff Ron Klain who, at various times, portrayed Biden as intellectually sharp and fully in control.AXIOS REPORTER PUSHES BACK ON BIDEN'S DENIAL OF MENTAL DECLINE, SAYING WHITE HOUSE INSIDERS DISAGREEJean-Pierre even dismissed "right-wing critics" by blaming "cheap fake" videos and selectively edited media.But, according to Thompson, the reality behind closed doors told a different story."Throughout 2023 and 2024, there were steps taken to increasingly shield Joe Biden not just from the public, but from members of his own cabinet, members of his own senior staff," he said."One White House official who left in 2024 told us that they left in part because they were not comfortable with how they were trying to shield the extent of the decline."JAKE TAPPER'S PAST COVERAGE OF BIDEN'S COGNITIVE DECLINE UNDER SCRUTINY AHEAD OF HIS NEW BOOKThompson said Biden's condition became harder to conceal as time went on, and the now infamous debate performance against then-candidate Donald Trump in June 2024 shattered any remaining illusions."The Joe Biden that people saw on that debate stage I think the book really shows it was not the first time that Joe Biden had acted like that. You can also listen to the tapes from the Robert Hur investigation. I think you can sort of hear debate Biden, and there were increasingly frantic efforts to make sure that the public did not see debate Biden while the public did see that he was aging," he continued.Thompson said Biden's debate performance was likely a "shock" to millions of Americans who finally saw the "extent" of the slippage.Fox News Digital has written extensively dating back to the 2020 presidential campaign about former President Joe Biden's cognitive decline and his inner circles role in covering it up.

Atlanta Falcons quarterback Kirk Cousins poked fun at Travis Kelces hairy back as a photo of the Kansas City Chiefs star went viral across social media last week.Cousins spoke to E! News during the week and was among those who weighed in on the tight end while he was at the grand opening of Universal Epic Universe in Orlando, Florida.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM"God bless Taylor Swift for being good with that," he told the outlet. "That's awesome. Good for her."Cousins chalked up Kelces hairy situation to "genetics" and said he was happy he didnt have to deal with that.Kelce is known for having a big beard around his chin during NFL games. He spoke about his body hair with his brother Jason in the latest episode of the "New Heights" podcast.JOURNALIST TIM COWLISHAW TAKES AIM AT ESPN AS 'AROUND THE HORN' CONCLUDES 22-YEAR RUN"You guys haven't seen the Yeti come out of here," the three-time Super Bowl champion said. "You don't want to see the Yeti come out."He recalled playing basketball in college at Cincinnati and having to play shirts against skins."I had the big beard, I had the long hair. I had the chest hair, back hair, arm hair, leg hair. It's just a big ole Yeti out there, man," he said. "All the homies on the court were calling me 'Big Yeti."Kelce is set to play in Year 13 for the Chiefs. He had 97 catches for 823 yards and three touchdowns for the Chiefs in 2024. Kansas City made it all the way back to the Super Bowl but lost to the Philadelphia Eagles.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Shedeur Sanders acknowledged the criticism hes faced while he played at Jackson State and Colorado ahead of his decision to go pro and enter the NFL Draft and theorized about why he takes a ton of heat.The spotlight was scorching hot last month when he fell to the fifth round of the draft after being projected to be taken as high as No. 2. The Cleveland Browns eventually took a chance on him at pick No. 144.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COMHe told Cleveland.com he thinks a lot of the hate directed at him is based on his father, Deion Sanders."They don't care about other people's opinion of you," Sanders said of the younger generation while visiting a local high school. "They go based off their own 99% of hatred (directed at him) is toward pops. And then I'm just his son. But (the kids) didn't grow up in an era to where they watched him play. It's just the older generation that does it to me rather than the younger people. Because when I come in person, there's no negativity I see. But it's all over online.HALL OF FAMER BRIAN URLACHER REITERATES STANCE ON TRANSGENDER ATHLETES IN SPORTS: 'COMMON SENSE'"So, that's why I say I like going (to schools) in person and actually meeting them, and any questions they have, I say, 'Just ask me whatever question you want. Pick any question. No filter, no anything.' That's what they say. And then I just answer whatever they need me to answer."Sanders will be able to shut up some of the critics who have already written him off.He enters a crowded quarterback room with veterans Joe Flacco and Kenny Pickett as well as someone from his own rookie class in Dillon Gabriel.He signed his rookie contract earlier in the week. All eyes will be on him and his three teammates during offseason workouts.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

House Speaker Mike Johnson went to battle with Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., over spending cuts and the national debt in President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" this weekend.Johnson made the comments during an appearance on "Fox News Sunday" with host Shannon Bream, after Paul had called the spending cuts in the current version of the bill "wimpy.""It sounds like his biggest objection is the fact that we are extending the debt ceiling. That's a critically important thing to do. We have to do it. We're not going to get any Democrats to assist on that," Johnson said Sunday."So to get it through the Senate and make sure we don't crash the U.S. economy and default on our debts for the first time in history, it has to be part of the reconciliation package. And that's why President Trump and all the other Republicans in Congress, House and Senate understand the necessity of this," he added.MIKE JOHNSON, DONALD TRUMP GET BIG, 'BEAUTIFUL WIN AS BUDGET PASSES HOUSEPaul himself also appeared on "Fox News Sunday" later in the show, and he continued to blast what he said was a lack of real spending cuts.GOP HOLDOUTS SOUND ALARM ON $36T DEBT CRISIS AS TRUMP'S 'BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL' PASSES HOUSE VOTE"I supported the tax cuts in 2017. I support making them permanent, so I support that part of the bill. I support spending cuts. I think the cuts currently in the bill are wimpy and anemic, but I still would support the bill, even with wimpy and anemia cuts, if they weren't going to explode the debt. The problem is the math doesn't add up. They're going to explode the debt. The House's is $4 trillion. The Senate's actually been talking about exploding the debt by $5 trillion," Paul said.He went on to say that there is no way he can vote for a version of the bill that raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion."There's got to be someone left in Washington who thinks debt is wrong and deficits are wrongand wants to go in the other direction," he said.Paul instead proposed raising the debt ceiling for a period of three months, or $500 billion, on a rolling basis. He argued that voting on the issue every three months would force leadership to take the issue seriously by placing the lack of progress center stage in U.S. politics."The deficit is a threat to our country. I think it's the greatest threat to national security. And so I think you can't do this," Paul said.

The tush push survived for at least one more season as NFL owners voted against a proposal that would have effectively banned the play for 2025 and beyond.The play, made famous by the Philadelphia Eagles, has been used to get quarterbacks the extra oomph they need to either attain a first down or score a touchdown from the goal line. And despite the Green Bay Packers efforts, the play survived.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COMEagles star Saquon Barkley had a message for those teams, and everyone else, who opposed the play."I think its soft, to be honest," he said on the "Exciting Mics" podcast with his teammates Cooper DeJean and Reed Blankenship before the vote occurred. "Everybody can do it. Its not a play that we only can do. We happen to have one of the best and biggest O-lines, and Jalen Hurts can squat 600 pounds. Thats not our fault.AARON RODGERS REVEALS TEAM HE HAS NO INTEREST PLAYING FOR AS FREE AGENCY DECISION LOOMS"Josh Allen is super big, theyre not successful with it. Lamar Jackson is one of the best running quarterbacks of all-time, theyre not successful with it. So, its not something that everyone cant do. Them trying to eliminate it, I think thats kind of lame."Barkley also pushed back on the claim that the play is a risk to players safety.The Packers'official rule change proposalwould have prohibited "an offensive player from pushing a teammate who was lined up directly behind the snapper and receives the snap, immediately at the snap." The proposal added that a penalty would be assessed on any offensive player who violated the rule.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Shedeur Sanders acknowledged the criticism hes faced while he played at Jackson State and Colorado ahead of his decision to go pro and enter the NFL Draft and theorized about why he takes a ton of heat.The spotlight was scorching hot last month when he fell to the fifth round of the draft after being projected to be taken as high as No. 2. The Cleveland Browns eventually took a chance on him at pick No. 144.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COMHe told Cleveland.com he thinks a lot of the hate directed at him is based on his father, Deion Sanders."They don't care about other people's opinion of you," Sanders said of the younger generation while visiting a local high school. "They go based off their own 99% of hatred (directed at him) is toward pops. And then I'm just his son. But (the kids) didn't grow up in an era to where they watched him play. It's just the older generation that does it to me rather than the younger people. Because when I come in person, there's no negativity I see. But it's all over online.HALL OF FAMER BRIAN URLACHER REITERATES STANCE ON TRANSGENDER ATHLETES IN SPORTS: 'COMMON SENSE'"So, that's why I say I like going (to schools) in person and actually meeting them, and any questions they have, I say, 'Just ask me whatever question you want. Pick any question. No filter, no anything.' That's what they say. And then I just answer whatever they need me to answer."Sanders will be able to shut up some of the critics who have already written him off.He enters a crowded quarterback room with veterans Joe Flacco and Kenny Pickett as well as someone from his own rookie class in Dillon Gabriel.He signed his rookie contract earlier in the week. All eyes will be on him and his three teammates during offseason workouts.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.