The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to lift an injunction against the Trump administration blocking it from ending protections for hundreds of thousands of migrants in the U.S. a win for Trump's immigration agenda.The ruling will allow the Trump administration to move forward with its plans to terminate Biden-era Temporary Protected Status (TPS) protections for roughly 300,000 Venezuelan migrants living in the U.S., possibly subjecting them to immediate removal.U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer asked the Supreme Court to lift the injunction, arguing that a federal judge overstepped by blocking the government from ending the program for certain Venezuelans.TRUMP ADMINISTRATION ASKS SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW EL SALVADOR DEPORTATION FLIGHT CASE"The district courts reasoning is untenable," Sauer told the high court, adding that the program "implicates particularly discretionary, sensitive, and foreign-policy-laden judgments of the Executive Branch regarding immigration policy."At issue was the TPS program, a program that allows individuals from certain countries to live and work in the U.S. legally if they cannot work safely in their home country due to a disaster, armed conflict or other "extraordinary and temporary conditions."The protections were extended during the end of the Biden administration, shortly before Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in February abruptly terminated the program for a specific group of Venezuelan nationals, arguing they were not in the national interest.In March, U.S. District Judge Edward Chen agreed to keep the protections in place, siding with plaintiffs from the National TPS Alliance in ruling that the termination of the TPS program, which is extended in 18-month increments, is "unprecedented," and suggested that the abrupt termination may have been "predicated on negative stereotypes" about Venezuelan migrants.This was disputed bitterly by Sauer bitterly disputed in their appeal to the Supreme Court.In it, he also accused the lower court judge of improperly intruding on the executive branchs authority over immigration policy."Forceful condemnations of gang violence and broad questioning of the integrity of the prior administrations immigration practices, including potential abuses of the TPS program, do not evince discriminatory intent," Sauer said, describing Judge Chen's descriptions as "cherry picked" and "wrongly portrayed" as "racially tinged."This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates.

"Dilbert" comic strip creator Scott Adams revealed Mondayhe has prostate cancer, saying that "every day is a nightmare," and that "my life expectancy is maybe this summer."Adams, 67, made the announcement while talking about former President Joe Bidens cancer diagnosis."I have the same cancer that Joe Biden has. I also have prostate cancer that has also spread to my bones," Adams said during his "Coffee with Scott Adams" web show. "My life expectancy is maybe this summer. I expect to be checking out from this domain sometime this summer.""The disease is already intolerable. I can tell you that I dont have good days," Adams continued. "So if you are wondering, Hey Scott, do you have any good days? Nope. Nope. Every day is a nightmare and evening is even worse."WHITE HOUSE SAYS TRUMP TRUSTS HIS PHYSICIANS FOLLOWING BIDENS CANCER ANNOUNCEMENT"I do have the ability to kind of get up for this part of the day, but I am in pain, and Im always in pain. And the pain moves around to different parts of my body," Adams also said. "Ive been using a walker to walk for months now."Hundreds of newspapers pulled Adams comic strip "Dilbert" in early 2023, after he made racially charged comments during the same show.WHY DID DILBERT ARTIST UNLEASH THAT RACIST DIATRIBE?"If nearly half of all Blacks are not okay with White people according to this poll, not to me thats a hate group," Adams said in a past episode of"Coffee with Scott Adams," referring to a Rasmussen poll. "Thats a hate group, and I dont want anything to do with them."The "Dilbert" comic strip was named after its title character struggling to make it up the corporate ladder and often poked fun at office culture with satirical humor and social commentary. Adams began writing and illustrating the comic in 1989 before launching a newer version, called "Dilbert Reborn."Fox News Peter Aitken, Howard Kurtz and Louis Casiano contributed to this report.

The Wall Street Journal editorial board called out CNN host Jake Tapper on Sunday for previously dismissing the paper's June 2024 article about former President Joe Biden showing "signs of slipping." The criticism comes as Tapper's new book on Biden's decline while in office is set to be released."The Wall Street Journal reported, in a detailed piece on June 4, 2024, that those who observed Mr. Biden in person were concerned about his decline. Mr. Tapper quoted a White House dismissal of the story, including a sneer that the Journal is owned by News Corp, which is run by the Murdochs, as if that rebutted the story. He then interviewed a Democrat who dismissed it," the paper's editorial board wrote, recalling a segment from Tapper's CNN show, "The Lead," from last year."A more curious journalist would have explored if it were true, and maybe even done some of his own reporting. Only now does he tacitly admit the Journal was right," the board added.The Journal reported at the time that the president was showing "signs of slipping," as its reporters spoke to 45 lawmakers and administration officials about Bidens mental faculties. Tapper and Axios reporter Alex Thompson's new book, "Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again," will be released on Tuesday.BIDEN BATTLING MOST AGGRESSIVE TYPE OF PROSTATE CANCER WITH BONE METASTASIS, MEDICAL EXPERT SAYS"The Biden senility coverup is also a media reckoning. Whenever someone dared to point out that Mr. Biden wasnt up to the job, a praetorian media guard assembled to deny it. We could quote chapter and verse from many media sources, but one example worth citing is none other than Mr. Tapper. Grabien, the TV clip service, has compiled a montage of the CNN host casting doubt on those who cast doubt on Mr. Bidens mental fitness," the WSJ editors wrote.In June 2024, weeks before the debate that exposed Biden's cognitive decline on the world stage, Tapper addressed the Wall Street Journal's report, which at the time faced intense backlash from Democrats and the liberal media.Tapper kept his focus on the White House's aggressive response to the "false" claims made in the report and repeatedly told viewers the report was "mostly based on observations of Republicans." He had a top Biden surrogate, Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., on to defend the president and attempt to discredit the reporting as agenda-driven.CNN'S AXELROD SUGGESTS DISCUSSIONS AROUND BIDENS MENTAL ACUITY SHOULD BE SET ASIDE AMID CANCER DIAGNOSISA spokesperson for CNN strongly pushed back at the notion that Tapper offered insufficient coverage of the Biden scandal before the debate."Jake Tapper is a veteran journalist whose tenacious and thorough reporting has held those in power to account on both sides of the aisle for decades," the spokesperson told Fox News Digital last week."He fairly and accurately covered Senator, Vice President and President Biden through years of dogged Washington reporting, hitting every high and low of the former presidents political career. From the campaign in 2020 to 2024 when he dropped out, Jake raised concerns about President Bidens mental stamina on his shows, questioned Biden officials directly about his health on air, and consistently encouraged open discussion and debate on the issue.""Despite bad faith allegations otherwise, the record clearly shows Jake covered the Clooney op-ed, the Hur report, and Biden physical limitations. As noted, Jake also covered Biden's physical falls multiple times, and he happened to be on assignment in Chicago off air the day after his bike fall in June 2022," the spokesperson added.Regarding the WSJ editorial, on Monday CNN directed Fox News Digital to a Friday social media post by the network's communications team suggesting the Grabien video montage cited by the Journal took Tapper's comments out of context. The X post read in part: "This video is disingenuously edited to create a misleading narrative. The clips are maliciously cut to omit context and make comments made by others appear as though they are Jakes own."The Journal called out the Democratic Party as well, as some leaders admit the president shouldn't have run for re-election, and others insist on looking forward."The coverup of Mr. Bidens mental decline will go down as one of the great scandals of modern politics. By refusing to admit what voters could so clearly see, Democrats denied their party an open primary. Once Mr. Biden imploded, they handed Kamala Harris the nomination without debate," the editors wrote."Democrats and the press are now appalled by Mr. Trumps second term. They would do better to think upon, and seek contrition for, their own role in making it possible," they continued.CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTUREBiden was diagnosed with an "aggressive" form of prostate cancer on Friday, according to the former president's office. The diagnosis was revealed to the public on Sunday.The Journal editorial board included an editor's note at the top of the article acknowledging the former president's cancer diagnosis that reads, "This editorial was published before news broke of President Bidens cancer diagnosis. We wish him God speed on his recovery."Fox News' Joseph Wulfsohn contributed to this report.

EXCLUSIVE: United States Attorney for the District of California Bill Essayli is taking major action to crack down on "sanctuary" policies in the Golden State.Hes launching "Operation Guardian Angel," which is a task force, made up of assets from ICE, HSI, DEA, FBI, ATF, and Border Patrol, to begin scanning a criminal database every single day to identify arrested illegal aliens in local jurisdictions that DOJ can charge with felony illegal-reentry."They've made it almost impossible for ICE to do their job, issue detainers and get criminal illegal immigrants out of jails. So what we're doing instead is we're going to start issuing warrants," he told Fox News.'DEPORTATION FLIGHTS HAVE BEGUN' AS TRUMP SENDS 'STRONG AND CLEAR MESSAGE,' WHITE HOUSE SAYS"We're going to flood the system with warrants for criminal illegal immigration that are in county jails, they can ignore a detainer, but they cannot ignore a criminal arrest warrant," Essayli continued."As soon as an illegal immigrant is booked into a county jail, we're reviewing their file. And if they meet the elements of illegal reentry, which is a federal crime, we are filing a complaint and getting an arrest warrant issued before they're released from state custody."Essayli said that the first-of-its-kind program will make the Golden State a "testing ground" for other sanctuary jurisdictions throughout the country, as the administration aims to get illegal aliens with criminal charges and convictions swiftly out of the United States.TRUMP GOES TOE-TO-TOE WITH SANCTUARY CITIES OVER DEPORTATION AS ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION CRACKDOWN SET TO BEGINWhile border crossings have plummeted, the administration is aiming to boost the number of removals. The CBP One app was turned into the CBP Home app, where those in the country illegally can now self-deport with a paid-for flight and an $1,000 stipend once they have been confirmed to leave the country.As for illegal aliens in the criminal justice system, the attorney said they plan to file up to 50 warrants a week in his jurisdiction, which covers Los Angeles theres already been 350 filed since Trump took office.CLICK HERE FOR MORE IMMIGRATION COVERAGE"They have no choice, they will comply. And if they don't comply, if they interfere in our ability to arrest a federal felon, they can expect to face consequences for that. So I don't expect any resistance from the local authorities," he said.TRUMP GOES TOE-TO-TOE WITH SANCTUARY CITIES OVER DEPORTATION AS ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION CRACKDOWN SET TO BEGINFelony re-entry was largely not prosecuted during the Biden administration. Essayli says his predecessor, the US Attorney in Los Angeles under Biden, only filed17of these cases in two years.The attorney said transferring from local to federal custody is one of the better ways to get hold of illegal aliens with criminal charges."This is the safest way for us to get criminal illegal immigrants. Get them while they're still in state custody, where they've been searched. They have no weapons, and we can do a safe transfer," he said.Fox News' Andrew Mark Miller contributed to this report.

President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held a 2-hour call on Monday in what the U.S. said was a push to get Russia to end its deadly war in Ukraine.Both Trump and Putin described the call as "frank" and "useful," but it is not immediately clear what results were achieved.Trump took to social media to praise the call as having gone "very well" and said, "Russia and Ukraine will immediately start negotiations toward a Ceasefire and, more importantly, an END to the War."RUSSIA BOMBARDS UKRAINE WITH DRONES HOURS AFTER TRUMP ANNOUNCES TALKS WITH PUTIN"The conditions for that will be negotiated between the two parties, as it can only be, because they know details of a negotiation that nobody else would be aware of," he added.Putin, in a statement after the call, also noted that "a ceasefire with Ukraine is possible" but noted "Russia and Ukraine must find compromises that suit both sides."Any concrete details on the nature of these compromises remain unclear, despite negotiation attempts in Turkey on Friday.Ceasefire talks fell through last week after a Ukrainian delegation said it was presented with demands from the Russian delegation that were "unacceptable," including reported calls for the complete removal of Ukrainian troops from four Ukrainian regions that Russian illegally annexed in 2022, including Kherson, Donetsk, Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia.The Russia delegation also allegedly demanded that the international community not only recognize the regions as now Russian, but cease all aid to Ukraine, including plans to supply peace-keeping troops once the fighting concludes.This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates.

Former Rep. Bob Good, a Republican from Virginia who once chaired the conservative House Freedom Caucus, is sounding the alarm about America's "fiscal crisis," accusing fellow Republicans of failing to focus on the critical issue and slash spending.He blamed "all Republican leadership," during an interview with Fox News Digital. "You're not hearing a lot from Republican leadership from the White House or from the Congress about spending cuts," he said.Good praised President Donald Trump on a variety of issues, crediting the president with doing a "great job in many executive actions," but he described the moves as "quick fix sugar highs" that could easily be undone when a Democrat wins the presidency again and said that Congress has not been codifying Trump's policies into law.He said that "the big glaring weakness for all of Republican government" is failing to focus on the nation's debt and deficit, and to slash spending.TRUMP'S BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL PASSES KEY HOUSE HURDLE AFTER GOP REBEL MUTINYThe U.S. national debt is over $36.2 trillion, according to fiscaldata.treasury.gov.President Trump and some GOP lawmakers have been seeking to push Trump's "One, Big, Beautiful Bill" through Congress, but other Republicans have been pressing for changes.The House Freedom Caucus issued a statement on Sunday night declaring that the measure "does not yet meet the moment.""As written, the bill continues increased deficits in the near term with possible savings years down the road that may never materialize. Thanks to discussions over the weekend, the bill will be closer to the budget resolution framework we agreed upon in the House in April, but it fails to actually honor our promise to significantly correct the spending trajectory of the federal government and lead our nation towards a balanced budget," the caucus board's statement reads, in part, later adding, "We face a serious fiscal crisis, and we must put an end to Washingtons wasteful spending now."TRUMP'S BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL WINS SUPPORT FROM POLICE FOR OVERTIME TAX ELIMINATIONGood, a fiscal hawk who has been referring to the measure as the "big, ugly bill," indicated that if Republicans do not fight now when they only need 51 votes to pass a measure in the Senate due to reconciliation, they will not do so later.He said most GOP figures, like most Democrats, are largely focused on their own political careers and will "be even weaker" in 2026, the year of the midterm elections.Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought has pushed back against criticism of the reconciliation bill."Critics have attacked the House's One Big Beautiful reconciliation bill on fiscal grounds, but I think they are profoundly wrong," he wrote in a part of a post on X last week. "The current House bill includes $1.6 trillion in savings. These are not gimmicks but real reforms that lower spending and improve the programs.""So after nothing happening for decades, the House bill provides a historic $1.6 trillion in mandatory savings...with a three-seat majority. $36 trillion in debt is not solved overnight. It is solved by advancing and securing victories at a scale that over time, gives a fighting shot to addressing the problem. The House's One Big Beautiful Bill deserves passage for many reasons ... tax cuts, border security funding, eliminating the Green New Deal, work requirements to end dependency ... but it should not be lost on anyone, the degree to which it ends decades of fiscal futility and gets us winning again. It deserves the vote of every member of Congress," he asserted.TOO LATE: TRUMP BACKS CHALLENGER TO FREEDOM CAUCUS CHAIR DESPITE RECEIVING PRIOR ENDORSEMENTGood, who served in Congress from early 2021 until early 2025, lost a 2024 congressional GOP primary contest to a Trump-backed challenger.Trump repeatedly attacked Good in the lead up to the 2024 primary contest, asserting on Truth Social that "Bob Good is BAD FOR VIRGINIA, AND BAD FOR THE USA."Good ultimately lost the primary by less than 1% of the vote.He had endorsed Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis for president in 2023 before the governor launched his White House bid that year. In 2024, Good endorsed Trump immediately after DeSantis dropped out.In his endorsement post, Good called Trump "the greatest President of my lifetime," adding, "we need him to reinstate the policies that were working so well for America."Good expressed interest in the prospect of potentially running for office again, telling Fox News Digital that he is keeping his "options open" and praying about it, but has not arrived at a decision yet.

Former NBA player Etan Thomas compared Chicago Sky star Angel Reese to a member of the "Little Rock Nine," as the WNBA player allegedly had "hateful comments" hurled toward her during the teams loss to the Indiana Fever.Thomas posted a photo to his social media account on Monday, portraying Reese as one of the nine Black schoolgirls who were able to attend an all-White school in Arkansas following the 1954 Supreme Court ruling that ended segregation in public schools.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COMThe photo showed Reese superimposed onto the iconic black and white photo known as the "Scream Image." It showed 15-year-old Elizabeth Eckford being yelled at on her way to school. The picture depicted the bravery Eckford showed by going into Little Rock Central High School."This is how its been for Angel Reese ever since the 2023 NCAA Tournament when her LSU Tigers defeated Caitlin Clark and the Iowa Hawkeyes in the national championship game," Thomas wrote on X.The WNBA was reportedly investigating racial slurs that were reported to have been directed at Reese during the game on Saturday. The league did not get into specifics of what allegedly occurred during the game at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis."The WNBA strongly condemns racism, hate, and discrimination in all forms they have no place in our league or in society. We are aware of the allegations and are looking into the matter," the league said in a statement.DAVE PORTNOY SLAMS WNBA AS LEAGUE INVESTIGATES 'HATEFUL COMMENTS' TOWARD ANGEL REESEThe Womens National Basketball Players Association (WNBPA) also released a statement."The WNBPA is aware of reports of hateful comments at yesterdays game in Indianapolis and supports the WNBAs current investigation into this matter," the union said. "Such behavior is unacceptable for our sport."Under the WNBAs No Space for Hate policy, we trust the league to thoroughly investigate and take swift, appropriate action to ensure a safe and welcoming environment for all."Reese and Clark had a heated exchange during the game, but both players said it was a "basketball play" and nothing more.Reeses confidence in her abilities and willingness to back them up has made her one of the most-talked-about athletes in the WNBA.She finished second in WNBA Rookie of the Year voting, earned a WNBA MVP vote and finished her first year with the Sky averaging a double-double.Follow Fox News Digitalssports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Harvard University is facing demands from key House Republicans to explain allegations it trained members of a Chinese paramilitary group and worked with Iran-linked researchers.In a letter sent this week, Reps. John Moolenaar, R-Mich., chairman of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party; Tim Walberg, R-Mich., chairman of the Education and the Workforce Committee; and Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., requested internal documents and communications from Harvard officials detailing the universitys partnerships with foreign adversaries.The lawmakers raised alarm over Harvards repeated hosting and training of members of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC) a paramilitary organization sanctioned by the U.S. government for its role in the Chinese Communist Partys genocide against Uyghur Muslims.According to the letter, Harvard allegedly used Department of Defense funding to partner with Chinese universities on research with potential military applications.HARVARD UPDATES LAWSUIT AFTER TRUMP CANCELS ADDITIONAL $450M IN FUNDINGBetween 2020 and 2024, Harvard researchers also collaborated on at least four projects funded by an agent of the Iranian regime, raising concerns about violations of U.S. sanctions laws.Harvards China Health Partnership reportedly hosted healthcare policy training sessions that included XPCC officials, a fact highlighted by Chinese government outlets."We are deeply concerned the services and resources provided through these events may violate U.S. law and could have been deployed by XPCC to further repress the Uyghur people and other ethnic minorities in China," the lawmakers wrote.Harvard replied to a request for comment: "We can confirm receipt and will respond to the Chairs letter."HARVARD PRESIDENT CLAIMS UNFOUNDED RETALIATION AMID TRUMP FUNDING FEUDThe letter points to several specific research collaborations: In one case, Harvard researchers received DARPA funding to work with Tsinghua University faculty on zero-indexed materials technology that could advance artificial intelligence systems.In another, a Harvard researcher partnered with a Zhejiang University professor on polymer science research funded by the U.S. Air Force, which could be applied to aircraft construction.A third project involved shape memory alloys, materials with aerospace applications, researched alongside faculty from Huazhong University, also under Air Force funding."Harvard researchers should not be contributing to the military capabilities of a potential adversary," the letter stated.The lawmakers also noted that Harvard researchers have routinely worked with Chinese military-linked institutions on dual-use technologies, including microelectronics, AI, and quantum science.Additionally, the lawmakers raised concerns over Harvards organ transplant research involving China-based collaborators, citing growing international scrutiny of Chinas forced organ harvesting practices."Harvard trained members of a sanctioned Chinese paramilitary group responsible for genocide, and its researchers partnered with Chinese military universities on DoD-funded research and worked with researchers funded by the Iranian regime," said Moolenaar."These are not isolated incidents they represent a disturbing pattern that puts U.S. national security at risk. The Select Committees investigation will deliver answers, expose the truth, and hold Harvard accountable to the American people.

The Louisiana governor is starkly warning those aiding and abetting the states escaped inmates that they will be facing jail time for their actions. A manhunt has been underway since early Friday morning when surveillance footage shows ten inmates breaking out of their cells in New Orleans and making a run for freedom. Authorities have captured three of the escapees and have warned the others on the run include suspects charged with murder, domestic abuse and burglary. The FBI is offering an award of up to $5,000 for tips leading to the arrest of the fugitives. The prison break is suspected to have happened due to an inside job. Now, the states leader says those helping the inmates will be held accountable.7 FUGITIVES REMAIN ON THE RUN AFTER NOLA PRISON BREAK; INSIDE JOB SUSPECTED"Not only those people who may have aided and abetted them to get out, but those who continue to aid and abet them, if we find them, if we find that you have aided and abetted these fugitives, you're going to jail as well," Landy warned on Monday.The governor told"America Reports" that authorities have been getting tips about the fugitives all day long and have reason to believe most of them are still in the city of New Orleans. Tips have also been sent to other jurisdictions outside the state where the inmates may also reside."We've got men and women working around the clock," he said. "We're going to hunt these folks down. We're going to find them, and we're going bring them back to a jail that they can't break out of." Landry also pointed to problems with the citys "criminal justice system as a whole." "Several years ago, George Soros came over to New Orleans like Santa Claus and unpacked the district attorney, six judges, and a sheriff and this is what ... a progressive criminal justice system looks like .... This is what happens when those people promise that to keep criminals out of jail, sadly, you get 10 of the most dangerous inmates that are in jail in Louisiana, they get to escape."Fox News Michael Dorgan and Alexandra Koch contributed to this report.

Colorado potentially faces a major lawsuit regarding a new law on transgender protections and how it could violate free speech and parental rights.On Friday, Gov. Jared Polis signed into law the Kelly Loving Act, a bill that expands state anti-discrimination protections for transgender individuals by allowing a persons "chosen name" to qualify as a form of "gender expression" that is protected under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA).Now that the bill has passed, the group Defending Education (DE) has sued the state on behalf of the Do No Harm, The Colorado Parent Advocacy Network and Protect Kids Colorado groups out of concerns that the law could violate their free speech rights."The Acts new definition of gender expression is unconstitutionally overbroad," the lawsuit provided to Fox News Digital reads. "Because it covers any treatment based on the use of a chosen name or other forms of preferred address, it punishes many forms of constitutionally protected speech."COLORADO'S 'TOTALITARIAN' TRANSGENDERISM BILL SPARKS CONCERNS FROM PARENTSIt continued, "When speakers refer to transgender-identifying individuals using biologically accurate terms, they advance a viewpoint about a hot-button political issue: gender ideology. That kind of speech lies at the core of the First Amendment. But the Acts definition of gender expression makes all such speech discriminatory and unlawful."The lawsuit added that since CADA prohibits the "publishing of discriminative matter," the new act could prohibit and potentially penalize individuals, including parents, for publicly disapproving of changing ones name and gender. In a statement to Fox News Digital, Sarah Parshall Perry, Vice President of Defending Education, said the law "muzzles" parents and doctors to protect the state's "preferred gender orthodoxy.""Colorado cant seem to stop losing at the Supreme Court on constitutional challenges to its anti-discrimination laws. And yet, Governor Polis has nevertheless signed another patently unconstitutional iteration of its Colorado Anti-Discrimination Actsomething that can only be described as an exercise of remarkable hubris," Perry said.DE is seeking a preliminary and permanent injunction on enforcing this new definition as a violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments for using "unconstitutionally overbroad" language and enforcing "compelled speech.""Do No Harm is proud to challenging Colorados absurd so-called anti-discrimination act. Abridging Americans constitutional right to freedom of expression in the name of radical gender ideology is wrong. We expect the court to reaffirm that the Constitution trumps progressive dogma," said Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, Chairman of Do No Harm.Fox News Digital reached out to the governors office for comment.The Kelly Loving Act has come under fire by conservatives and Colorado parents since it was introduced in March. Among the protections in the original bill included a ruling that "deadnaming, misgendering, or threatening to publish material related to an individual's gender-affirming health-care services" could be considered forms of "coercive control" that could affect a parent's custody over children.After facing backlash, Colorado lawmakers eventually removed language regarding "deadnaming" and child custody, although opponents still criticized elements of the bill for broad language.COLORADO PARENTS UNLOAD ON LIBERAL LAWMAKERS, PROMPTING CHANGES TO CONTROVERSIAL GENDER BILLColorado has been at the center of several high-profile cases based on its anti-discrimination laws over the past few years. Most infamously, Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips has been sued multiple times over his refusal to bake a cake celebrating a same-sex wedding or a gender transition.In 2023, the Supreme Court ruled against the state, finding that Colorados anti-discrimination laws could not force a graphic designer to create wedding websites for same-sex weddings in violation of her beliefs.CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP