The U.S. Navy veteran who successfully sued CNN for defamation earlier this year didnt have as much luck with lawsuits against the Associated Press and other media outlets.Judge William Henry of Floridas 14th Judicial Circuit, who also presided over Zachary Youngs successful CNN trial, granted two motions on Friday to dismiss defamation lawsuits against The Associated Press and Puck.The judge compared Youngs follow-up lawsuits to movie sequels that "should not be made."In January, a Florida jury found that CNN defamed Young by implying he illegally profited when helping peopleflee Afghanistanon the "black market" during theBiden administration'smilitary withdrawal from the country in 2021.Young was awarded $4 million in lost earnings, $1 million in personal damages, and the jury found that punitive damages were also warranted against CNN.A settlement was reached before punitive damages were decided by the jury.NAVY VETERAN WHO PROVED CNN DEFAMED HIM SUES ASSOCIATED PRESS, SAYS HE WAS FALSELY PAINTED AS SMUGGLERAP media reporter David Bauder wrote that "Youngs business helped smuggle people out of Afghanistan" when covering the CNN trial in a January 2025 article. However, Henry ruled it wasn't sufficient grounds for a lawsuit."It is said that for some movies or television shows, sequels or reboots should not be made. Oftentimes, the storyline is forced, new characters are not properly developed, inconsistencies arise between the original plot and the sequels, or the writers and producers are just lazy and trying to cash in on a previously successful idea. The same can be said of this case," Henry wrote.CNN DEFAMATION JUROR WOULD HAVE AWARDED NAVY VETERAN UP TO $100 MILLION BEFORE SETTLEMENT WAS REACHED"Unlike the CNN case, this case was a forced play without any character development. Under applicable law, there is no villain," Henry continued. "Rather, this is an attempt to repackage the CNN storyline against a different opponent. After screening this production, the Court determines that this sequel should not be released because, under the facts, this third installment does not work."Young, who declined comment, is expected to appeal the decision regarding the AP.The AP has defended its reporting throughout the process."APs story was a factual and accurate report on the jury verdict finding in Zachary Youngs favor. We will vigorously defend our reporting against this frivolous lawsuit," an AP spokesperson previously told Fox News Digital.JURY FINDS CNN COMMITTED DEFAMATION AGAINST NAVY VETERAN, SETTLEMENT REACHED ON PUNITIVE DAMAGESHenry also tossed Youngs suit against Puck, using the same movie analogy. The Puck suit was dismissed "with prejudice" and cannot be appealed.Young had claimed Puck republished "CNNs defamatory lies" when covering the initial lawsuit.After the January settlement, CNN said it will take "useful lessons" from the decision."We remain proud of our journalists and are 100% committed to strong, fearless and fair-minded reporting at CNN, though we will of course take what useful lessons we can from this case," a CNN spokesperson toldFox News Digital.