The New York Times recently attempted to downplay a significant error that was plastered on its front page. But when it comes to the legacy media's coverage of the Israel-Hamas war, the Gray Lady is in good company.Last month, the Times ran the somber headline, "Young, Old and Sick Starve to Death in Gaza: There Is Nothing." Accompanying it was a grim image of a malnourished infant and his mother. The caption read, "Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq, about 18 months, with his mother, Hedaya al-Mutawaq, who said he was born healthy but was recently diagnosed with severe malnutrition. A doctor said the number of children dying of malnutrition in Gaza had risen sharply."Critics quickly called out the Times for prominently featuring Mohammed, whose image was featured by numerous other media outlets, without mentioning that he has a genetic disorder.NEW YORK TIMES ADMITS USING MISLEADING COVER PHOTO OF EMACIATED GAZA CHILDThe Times finally addressed the major omission on Tuesday with an editors note buried underneath the lengthy story that had already circulated for more than four days."This article has been updated to include information about Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq, a child in Gaza suffering from severe malnutrition. After publication of the article, the Times learned from his doctor that Mohammed also had pre-existing health problems," the editors note stated.A spokesperson for the Times released a statement saying, "Children in Gaza are malnourished and starving, as New York Times reporters and others have documented. We recently ran a story about Gazas most vulnerable civilians, including Mohammed Zakaria al-Mutawaq, who is about 18 months old and suffers from severe malnutrition. We have since learned new information, including from the hospital that treated him and his medical records, and have updated ourstoryto add context about his pre-existing health problems. This additional detail gives readers a greater understanding of his situation.""Our reporters and photographers continue to report from Gaza, bravely, sensitively, and at personal risk, so that readers can see firsthand the consequences of the war," the statement added.Notably, that statement was shared by the Times' communications account, which has less than 90,000 followers on X, and not the Times' main account, which has more than 55 million followers.The Times wasn't alone. Outlets across the globe, including the BBC and NPR, similarly promoted such images without the context of the child's genetic disorder.Ever since Hamas carried out its gruesome terrorist attack against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, news organizations have largely framed the war as the Jewish State carrying out a disproportionate military response and being responsible for the suffering among the civilians in Gaza. And in doing so, several reports were walked back for various errors that all side against Israel and for the benefit of the Palestinian cause.Within days of Oct. 7, the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry claimed that Israel bombed Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital through an airstrike that resulted in over 500 civilian casualties.Subsequent reporting and intelligence found there was an explosion in the hospital's parking lot stemming from a misfired rocket fired by Hamas ally Islamic Jihad, resulting in a death toll a tiny fraction of what Hamas had first alleged.MEDIA HAS EGG ON ITS FACE FOR ALLOWING HAMAS TO SET INITIAL TONE OF GAZA HOSPITAL COVERAGE WITHOUT SKEPTICISMThe New York Times published the headline "Israeli Strike Kills Hundreds in Hospital, Palestinians Say." The paper later admitted it "relied too heavily on claims by Hamas, and did not make clear that those claims could not immediately be verified."CNN similarly pushed the narrative, running the headline, "Israel hits hospital and school in Gaza as blockade puts healthcare system in state of collapse." The headline was later changed to "Hundreds likely dead in Gaza hospital blast, as Israeli blockade cripples medical response." CNN, too, issued a correction."This article on the Gaza hospital blast initially did not clearly attribute claims about Israels responsibility to the Hamas-controlled Ministry of Health in Gaza," CNN's correction read. "Israel later said a misfired rocket by militant group Islamic Jihad caused the blast and produced evidence to support its claim. US President Joe Biden said the Israeli position is backed by US intelligence. CNN's forensic analysis of images and videos suggests a rocket fired from within Gaza caused the blast, not an Israeli airstrike."As documented by journalist Drew Holden, a slew of news outlets fell for Hamas' falsehood, including The Associated Press, Reuters, CBS News, The Washington Post, MSNBC, Politico, Axios and the BBC. Some never issued corrections.The Washington Post had a similar front-page blunder in July 2024 in its coverage of the Israel-Hezbollah escalation that occurred at the time.The Iran-backed terrorist group in Lebanon launched its deadliest assault against Israel since the Oct. 7 attack on the northern town of Majdal Shams in the Golan Heights, resulting in at least 12 dead and dozens injured, all of them children and teens who were playing on a soccer field.The Post's cover featured a large image of Israelis mourning the death of 11-year-old Alma Ayman Fakhr al-Din. However, underneath the image, the Post ran the headline, "Israel Hits Targets In Lebanon," referring to Israel's retaliatory strikes against Hezbollah.WASINGTON POST BLASTED FOR DISTORTING ISRAEL-HEZBOLLAH ESCALATION ON FRONT PAGEAfter sparking outrage on social media, the Post issued an editors' note."The headline and subheadline that accompanied a July 29 Page One photo and article about Israeli strikes on Hezbollah targets in Lebanon did not provide adequate context. The headlines should have noted that the Israeli strikes were a response to a rocket strike from Lebanon that killed 12 teenagers and children in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights. The photo depicted mourning for one of those victims, as the caption noted," Post editors wrote.In January, the Post quietly edited a report after it was asked about its citation of a pro-Palestinian group that the United States government had designated a "sham charity" for a terrorist organization.The "Democracy Dies in Darkness" paper published a story about the Palestinians who were released from Israeli custody as part of the hostage agreement made with Hamas."According to Samidoun, an activist network supporting Palestinian prisoners, the group includes journalists, activists, teachers, students and close relatives of high-profile Hamas figures," the Post wrote, including a link to a Samidoun article published earlier in the week.WASHINGTON POST CITES PRO-PALESTINIAN GROUP US GOVERNMENT DECLARED A SHAM CHARITY FOR TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONSamidoun, however, was singled out by the Biden administration last October as being financially linked to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), which has been designated as a terrorist organization by numerous countries, including the U.S. and the European Union. The Post article had referred to the PFLP as a "small leftist armed group.""Organizations like Samidoun masquerade as charitable actors that claim to provide humanitarian support to those in need, yet, in reality, divert funds for much-needed assistance to support terrorist groups," said Bradley T. Smith, the then-Acting Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence. "The United States, together with Canada and our like-minded partners, will continue to disrupt those who seek to finance the PFLP, Hamas, and other terrorist organizations."Among the prisoners released and reported on in the article was Khalida Jarrar, a PFLP member accused by Israel of supporting terrorism.Fox News Digital inquired about The Washington Post's citation in January. After an exchange with a spokesperson about a deadline for an official response regarding the newspaper's language, The Washington Post updated and added a "clarification" to the story without informing Fox News Digital."Those released include journalists, activists, teachers, students and close relatives of high-profile Hamas figures, according to Samidoun, a group supporting Palestinian prisoners that the United States says is a fundraiser for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which is under U.S. sanctions," the report now reads.The "clarification" at the bottom of the report states, "A previous version of this article referred to Samidoun as an activist network that supports Palestinian prisoners. However, it failed to note that the United States says the group is an international fundraiser for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which Washington has placed under sanctions."In February, the BBC aired a documentary called "Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone,"featuring narration from a 13-year-old boy named Abdullah, but the film failed to disclose that Abdullah was the son of senior Hamas official Ayman Alyazouri.The BBC pulled the documentary from its online streaming platform just five days after it was aired, and issued an apology."Since the transmission of our documentary on Gaza, the BBC has become aware of the family connections of the films narrator, a child called Abdullah. Weve promised our audiences the highest standards of transparency, so it is only right that as a result of this new information, we add some more detail to the film before its retransmission. We apologise for the omission of that detail from the original film," the BBC said in a statement at the time.BBC REPORT FINDS GAZA DOCUMENTARY NARRATED BY HAMAS TERRORIST'S SON BREACHED EDITORIAL STANDARDSAn internal review concluded last found that the BBC was unaware of Abdullahs lineage prior to the documentarys broadcast, but three members of the production company Hoyo Films did know that the boys father was a Hamas official.The probe, however, criticized the broadcaster for not being "sufficiently proactive"with its due diligence ahead of broadcast, and admonished it for a "lack of critical oversight of unanswered or partially answered questions" regarding the documentary ahead of broadcast. It claimed that the use of the Hamas-linked narrator did not influence the content of the film, but said the inclusion of the boy was "not appropriate.""We are owning where we have made mistakes, finding out what went wrong, acting on the findings, and we've said we're sorry," BBC News CEO Deborah Turnesstold the BBC's Radio 4.The BBC vowed to take steps to address the failure, including issuing new guidance on the use of narrators in documentaries centering on controversial topics, the creation of a new leadership role focusing on documentaries and a new review process that ensures that "no high-risk long form programs can be formally commissioned until all potential compliance considerations are considered and listed."Leading to another media fiasco in May, United Nations humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher offered a dire warning to the world about the health crisis in Gaza as truckloads of aid were being stalled."Let me describe what is on those trucks. This is baby food, baby nutrition. There are 14,000 babies that will die in the next 48 hours unless we can reach them," Fletcher told BBC's Radio 4. "This is not food that Hamas are going to steal."That claim quickly spread like wildfire. NBC News posted on X, "Around 14,000 babies could die in the next 48 hours if many more aid trucks do not reach Gaza, the U.N.'s humanitarian chief says." The claim was repeated on MSNBC by NBC News international correspondent Matt Bradley, telling anchor Ana Cabrera that "14,000 babies could die in the next 48 hours if the status quo in terms of humanitarian aid persists.""The UN warning that as many as 14,000 babies could die in the next 48 hours, Israel blocking all food and medicines now for nearly three months, saying it's trying to pressure Hamas to release hostages, including, of course, the four Americans believed to be dead," ABC News chief foreign correspondent Ian Pannell told "Good Morning America" co-host Robin Roberts."The urgent warnings tonight about the humanitarian crisis worsening in Gaza. The U.N. now warning 14,000 babies could die within 48 hours," ABC's David Muir teased viewers on "World News Tonight" before turning to Pannell. A UN spokesperson went on to clarify that 14,000 babies were actually at risk of suffering "severe acute malnutrition" if aid wasn't brought to Gazans, not of death, as Fletcher asserted. The BBC, NBC News and ABC News later issued clarifications.NY TIMES REPORTER WALKS BACK POST ABOUT RANDOMNESS OF ISRAELI STRIKES ON IRANIn June, when Israel carried out targeted strikes against top Iranian military generals and nuclear scientists in Tehran, New York Times UN bureau chief Farnaz Fassihi shared images of the aftermath, suggesting the attacks were random."A friend in Tehran sent me this video, apartment complex housing university professors attacked directly across the street from her house," Fassihi wrote. "The randomness of strikes in residential neighborhoods have terrified Iranians."Critics railed against Fassihi as Israeli forces used such remarkable precision to prevent mass civilian casualties. The Times journalist was forced to clarify her comment."About my tweet yesterday, I meant to say the sense of randomness caused by the strikes in residential neighborhoods has terrified Iranians. As we've reported, Israel has said the strikes are targeted," Fassihi said.Fox News' Brian Flood, David Spector and Rachel del Guidice contributed to this report.