Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick breaks down the new U.S.-U.A.E. A.I. partnership and the future of artificial intelligence on Hannity.

Fix California senior advisor Katie Zacharia discusses President Donald Trumps trip to the Middle East and his successful deals in the region on Fox News @ Night.

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld and the 'Gutfeld!' panel discuss former President Joe Biden's officials reportedly being 'awed' by President Donald Trump's successes in the Middle East.

A medical examiner testified she could identify John O'Keefe's cause of death as a head injury and hypothermia but could not determine whether it was homicide, accidental or any other manner Thursday during the murder trial of Karen Read in the 2022 death of her boyfriend, a 46-year-old Boston police officer.Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello, a forensic pathologist with Massachusetts' Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, performed the autopsy on O'Keefe Jan. 31, 2022.While Scordi-Bello found that O'Keefe had died from head trauma and hypothermia, the manner of death how he suffered those injuries was undetermined.The blunt impact to his head was the primary cause of death, she testified, but hypothermia contributed. He had a deep cut and bruising to the back of his head. Once she looked at it from the inside, she found multiple skull fractures and brain bleeding. And his body temperature when he arrived at the hospital was 80.1 degrees compared to a normal body temperature of 98.6.KAREN READ TRIAL: CRIME LAB EXPERT TESTIFIES BLOOD EVIDENCE WAS NEVER TESTEDShe discussed the external examination first, saying she found similar injuries to his face, head, hand, arm and knee that other witnesses, including paramedics and police, have already described to the jury.He had "superficial" scrapes and cuts on his arm, which did not penetrate the skin or expose fat or muscle tissue, she testified.She also performed an internal examination and looked at additional injuries.At the back of his skull, she found multiple fractures from a cut on the right side of his head.That injury is consistent with falling backward and landing with his head on the frozen ground, she testified during cross-examination from defense attorney Robert Alessi, who asked Scordi-Bello if O'Keefe should have sustained a circular wound instead of the linear one found at autopsy.KAREN READ'S DEFENSE OPENS DOOR FOR SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO BRING IN NEW EVIDENCE: COURT DOCS"There's nothing inconsistent with this injury and a fall on someone's on the back of the head with a blunt surface," she testified."A fall backwards where the person impacts the back of their head on flat, frozen ground would you expect that type of a laceration from that type of a fall?" Alessi followed up. "Not just a general fall backwards, but specifically a fall backwards where the back of the head hits flat, frozen ground. Would you expect that?""I could," Scordi-Bello said. "Yes."However, she also said she found no signs of grass on the back of O'Keefe's head.GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUBKILLER OR CONVENIENT OUTSIDER? 'UNEXPECTED CELEBRITY' KAREN READ'S TRIAL EXPLORED IN NEW FOX NATION SERIESAlessi also grilled her on the hypothermia finding, asking if internal injuries to O'Keefe's stomach and pancreas could have been caused by factors other than the freezing temperatures.She testified it is possible that his pancreas could have hemorrhaged from a device used to assist paramedics with CPR efforts, but that wouldn't have damaged his stomach. However, she later testified that the stomach ulcers could have been caused by O'Keefe drinking alcohol without taking his antacid medicine.The toxicology report found no drugs or prescription medications in his system at the time of his death. He had a .21% blood alcohol level. And he had been prescribed an antacid to prevent gastric ulcers.FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON XEven after an amended death certificate was issued, O'Keefe's manner of death remained undetermined. Scordi-Bello testified Thursday she stands by her findings as to the cause, head trauma and hypothermia.SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTERAfter Judge Beverly Cannone sent jurors home for the day, Alessi argued that new disclosures about expert testimony from Aperture, which conducted reports for the prosecution, would put the "entire defense" at risk if allowed this late in the game.The disclosure was dated May 8 but was received by the defense May 11, he said."I dont like to use hyperbolic words, but the word has been used against us ambush, ambush, ambush," Alessi said. "If theres ever an example of an ambush, this is it."In a heated back and forth, Brennan described the disclosure as evidence of a significant variance between the internal clocks in Reads Lexus SUV and John OKeefes cellphone data.Cannone did not announce a decision before adjourning court for the day.Read is due back Friday at 9 a.m.She could face life in prison if convicted of the most serious charge.

A medical examiner testified she could identify John O'Keefe's cause of death as a head injury and hypothermia but could not determine whether it was homicide, accidental or any other manner Thursday during the murder trial of Karen Read in the 2022 death of her boyfriend, a 46-year-old Boston police officer.Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello, a forensic pathologist with Massachusetts' Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, performed the autopsy on O'Keefe Jan. 31, 2022.While Scordi-Bello found that O'Keefe had died from head trauma and hypothermia, the manner of death how he suffered those injuries was undetermined.The blunt impact to his head was the primary cause of death, she testified, but hypothermia contributed. He had a deep cut and bruising to the back of his head. Once she looked at it from the inside, she found multiple skull fractures and brain bleeding. And his body temperature when he arrived at the hospital was 80.1 degrees compared to a normal body temperature of 98.6.KAREN READ TRIAL: CRIME LAB EXPERT TESTIFIES BLOOD EVIDENCE WAS NEVER TESTEDShe discussed the external examination first, saying she found similar injuries to his face, head, hand, arm and knee that other witnesses, including paramedics and police, have already described to the jury.He had "superficial" scrapes and cuts on his arm, which did not penetrate the skin or expose fat or muscle tissue, she testified.She also performed an internal examination and looked at additional injuries.At the back of his skull, she found multiple fractures from a cut on the right side of his head.That injury is consistent with falling backward and landing with his head on the frozen ground, she testified during cross-examination from defense attorney Robert Alessi, who asked Scordi-Bello if O'Keefe should have sustained a circular wound instead of the linear one found at autopsy.KAREN READ'S DEFENSE OPENS DOOR FOR SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO BRING IN NEW EVIDENCE: COURT DOCS"There's nothing inconsistent with this injury and a fall on someone's on the back of the head with a blunt surface," she testified."A fall backwards where the person impacts the back of their head on flat, frozen ground would you expect that type of a laceration from that type of a fall?" Alessi followed up. "Not just a general fall backwards, but specifically a fall backwards where the back of the head hits flat, frozen ground. Would you expect that?""I could," Scordi-Bello said. "Yes."However, she also said she found no signs of grass on the back of O'Keefe's head.GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUBKILLER OR CONVENIENT OUTSIDER? 'UNEXPECTED CELEBRITY' KAREN READ'S TRIAL EXPLORED IN NEW FOX NATION SERIESAlessi also grilled her on the hypothermia finding, asking if internal injuries to O'Keefe's stomach and pancreas could have been caused by factors other than the freezing temperatures.She testified it is possible that his pancreas could have hemorrhaged from a device used to assist paramedics with CPR efforts, but that wouldn't have damaged his stomach. However, she later testified that the stomach ulcers could have been caused by O'Keefe drinking alcohol without taking his antacid medicine.The toxicology report found no drugs or prescription medications in his system at the time of his death. He had a .21% blood alcohol level. And he had been prescribed an antacid to prevent gastric ulcers.FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON XEven after an amended death certificate was issued, O'Keefe's manner of death remained undetermined. Scordi-Bello testified Thursday she stands by her findings as to the cause, head trauma and hypothermia.SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTERAfter Judge Beverly Cannone sent jurors home for the day, Alessi argued that new disclosures about expert testimony from Aperture, which conducted reports for the prosecution, would put the "entire defense" at risk if allowed this late in the game.The disclosure was dated May 8 but was received by the defense May 11, he said."I dont like to use hyperbolic words, but the word has been used against us ambush, ambush, ambush," Alessi said. "If theres ever an example of an ambush, this is it."In a heated back and forth, Brennan described the disclosure as evidence of a significant variance between the internal clocks in Reads Lexus SUV and John OKeefes cellphone data.Cannone did not announce a decision before adjourning court for the day.Read is due back Friday at 9 a.m.She could face life in prison if convicted of the most serious charge.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said ex-FBI Director James Comey should be "put behind bars" for a post he made on Instagram on Thursday allegedly "issuing a call to assassinate [President Donald Trump.]"Earlier on Thursday, Comey shared a picture on Instagram with seashells formed in the numbers "86 47." To some, the number "86" is a call sign for murdering or getting rid of someone or something and "47" is typically used to refer to the 47th President of the United States."Cool shell formation on my beach walk," Comey wrote in the caption of the picture, which has since been deleted.Gabbard made the comments on "Jesse Watters Primetime" Thursday night after Comey said he wasn't aware that the number "86" stands for some sort of violence.EX-FBI CHIEF COMEYS 86 47 SOCIAL MEDIA POST CONDEMNED BY WHITE HOUSE AS ATTEMPT TO PUT HIT ON PRESIDENT"I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message," Comey said after deleting the initial picture. "I didn't realize some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me but I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down."Gabbard said Comey and his people "need to be held to account according to the law" regardless of why he said he posted the picture."The rule of law says people like him who issue direct threats against the POTUS, essentially issuing a call to assassinate him, must be held accountable under the law," Gabbard said, adding that she thinks he should be in jail.The national intelligence director said Comey's post has her "very concerned for [the president's life.]""I'm very concerned for the president's life; we've already seen assassination attempts. I'm very concerned for his life and James Comey, in my view, should be held accountable and put behind bars for this," she said.'NEVER TRUMPER' COMEY'S '86 47' TRUMP POST UNDER INVESTIGATIONGabbard also said Comey has a lot of influence and that there are "people who take [him] very seriously."Shortly after Comey removed the post, Fox News Digital learned from a Secret Service source that the agency was aware of the incident and agents are being sent to investigate and interview Comey.The White House also condemned Comey's actions, with White House deputy chief of staff and Cabinet Secretary Taylor Budowich calling his post "deeply concerning.""While President Trump is currently on an international trip to the Middle East, the former FBI Director puts out what can clearly be interpreted as a hit on the sitting President of the United States a message etched in the sand," Budowich wrote on X. "This is deeply concerning to all of us and is being taken seriously."Comey, who led the FBI during Trump's first term before he was fired from the spot, had no comment when reached by Fox News Digital earlier on Thursday.Fox News Digital's Alec Schemmel and David Spunt contributed to this report.

An officer in Fountain Valley, California, was seen on bodycam footage begging a half-naked man who stole her gun to not shoot her before another officer shot and killed him.

An officer in Fountain Valley, California, was seen on bodycam footage begging a half-naked man who stole her gun to not shoot her before another officer shot and killed him.

Scarlett Johansson has continued to share her opinion on artificial intelligence and she has some suggestions on how the technology should be regulated in the future.During an interview with Vanity Fair, the actress spoke out about AI companies that have used her likeness and allegedly her voice in the past. She told the outlet that she is advocating for legislation to be made around evolving technology."There has to be some agreed-upon set of boundaries in order for [AI] to not be detrimental. I wish more people in the public eye would support and speak out about that I dont know why thats not the case," Johansson said.WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)?This is not the first time Johansson has warned about the dangers of AI.In 2024, Johansson claimed she had been asked to voice OpenAIs Chatbot by CEO Sam Altman, but turned down the job, only for people to notice that the feature, named "Sky," sounded almost exactly like the actress."Particularly with the A.I. piece. It was like: If that can happen to me, how are we going to protect ourselves from this? Theres no boundary here; we're setting ourselves up to be taken advantage of," the 40-year-old toldInStyle Magazine in March.In a statement to NPR following the release of "Sky," Johansson said, "When I heard the released demo, I was shocked, angered and in disbelief that Mr. Altman would pursue a voice that sounded so eerily similar to mine that my closest friends and news outlets could not tell the difference. Mr. Altman even insinuated that the similarity was intentional, tweeting a single word her a reference to the film in which I voiced a chat system, Samantha, who forms an intimate relationship with a human."The "Black Widow" stars legal team sent OpenAI letters asking for an explanation about how the AI assistants voice came to be, and the company later agreed to take down "Sky."LIKE WHAT YOURE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSAltmanlater issued a statementto Fox News Digital regarding "Sky's" voice."The voice of Sky is not Scarlett Johansson's, and it was never intended to resemble hers. We cast the voice actor behind Skys voice before any outreach to Ms. Johansson. Out of respect for Ms. Johansson, we have paused using Skys voice in our products. We are sorry to Ms. Johansson that we didnt communicate better," the statement read.Speaking with InStyle, Johansson said shes become a reluctant voice in the AI conversation, but wont back down either.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER"I don't need to be beating the drum the whole time. Thats not my place. But, also, I'm not afraid of being invalidated," she said.Johansson added that after a Hollywood career that began as a child, shes not shy about speaking up for herself."But now I see that I actually built something that that I have a place here. And because of that, I've been able to stand up for myself and not feel like I would disappear. I can shoulder it," she said.The "Avengers" star alsotook legal action in 2023against an AI image-generating app called Lisa AI: 90s Yearbook & Avatar for using her voice and likeness in an ad posted on X.Johanssons attorney told Variety, "We do not take these things lightly. Per our usual course of action in these circumstances, we will deal with it with all legal remedies that we will have."

Scarlett Johansson has continued to share her opinion on artificial intelligence and she has some suggestions on how the technology should be regulated in the future.During an interview with Vanity Fair, the actress spoke out about AI companies that have used her likeness and allegedly her voice in the past. She told the outlet that she is advocating for legislation to be made around evolving technology."There has to be some agreed-upon set of boundaries in order for [AI] to not be detrimental. I wish more people in the public eye would support and speak out about that I dont know why thats not the case," Johansson said.WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)?This is not the first time Johansson has warned about the dangers of AI.In 2024, Johansson claimed she had been asked to voice OpenAIs Chatbot by CEO Sam Altman, but turned down the job, only for people to notice that the feature, named "Sky," sounded almost exactly like the actress."Particularly with the A.I. piece. It was like: If that can happen to me, how are we going to protect ourselves from this? Theres no boundary here; we're setting ourselves up to be taken advantage of," the 40-year-old toldInStyle Magazine in March.In a statement to NPR following the release of "Sky," Johansson said, "When I heard the released demo, I was shocked, angered and in disbelief that Mr. Altman would pursue a voice that sounded so eerily similar to mine that my closest friends and news outlets could not tell the difference. Mr. Altman even insinuated that the similarity was intentional, tweeting a single word her a reference to the film in which I voiced a chat system, Samantha, who forms an intimate relationship with a human."The "Black Widow" stars legal team sent OpenAI letters asking for an explanation about how the AI assistants voice came to be, and the company later agreed to take down "Sky."LIKE WHAT YOURE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSAltmanlater issued a statementto Fox News Digital regarding "Sky's" voice."The voice of Sky is not Scarlett Johansson's, and it was never intended to resemble hers. We cast the voice actor behind Skys voice before any outreach to Ms. Johansson. Out of respect for Ms. Johansson, we have paused using Skys voice in our products. We are sorry to Ms. Johansson that we didnt communicate better," the statement read.Speaking with InStyle, Johansson said shes become a reluctant voice in the AI conversation, but wont back down either.CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER"I don't need to be beating the drum the whole time. Thats not my place. But, also, I'm not afraid of being invalidated," she said.Johansson added that after a Hollywood career that began as a child, shes not shy about speaking up for herself."But now I see that I actually built something that that I have a place here. And because of that, I've been able to stand up for myself and not feel like I would disappear. I can shoulder it," she said.The "Avengers" star alsotook legal action in 2023against an AI image-generating app called Lisa AI: 90s Yearbook & Avatar for using her voice and likeness in an ad posted on X.Johanssons attorney told Variety, "We do not take these things lightly. Per our usual course of action in these circumstances, we will deal with it with all legal remedies that we will have."